Steven: Short call today, because of absences
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Jun/0033
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Sep/0004
Steven: Did your action give you any thoughts about what we should do with nested binds?
Erik: I'm not sure if there's any
hidden consequences to changing it.
... In the UI when we resolve a control, there's a non-trivial
algorithm, but in the UI we really care
... we have repeat indices, but in binds we don't.
... in this case it would make sense to return all.
Steven: The important case is a
repeat that references a nested bind.
... we don't have interoperability at the moment.
... I couldn't understand the current text enough to write test
cases.
... So you don't have a proposal for what it ought to do?
Erik: The possible proposed change would be to return all the nodes. This special thing about the context node...
Steven: The weird thing is that normally with @bind, we ignore the context node, we say <bind/> has its own context, and it's odd we mention it here
Erik: A little more thought is needed.
Steven: That's fine, then we can talk about it in two weeks' time.
Steven: I don't think there's anything else for the two of us to discuss today, so talk agin next meeting.
[ADJOURN]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Present: Steven Erik WARNING: Fewer than 3 people found for Present list! Regrets: Alain Philip No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: Steven Inferring Scribes: Steven Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Sep/0008 Found Date: 05 Sep 2018 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]