<jeanne> +1 to first Wednesday
RESOLUTION: We will meet on the first Wednesday of each month at this time, for 60 minutes
Same dial in information
Lisa will check out about moving the personalization planning call 30 min
Jeanne: Silver finished 16 months
of research
... design sprint in March
... lots of good ideas generated
... two projects:
... requitrements doc for silver
<jeanne> https://w3c.github.io/silver/requirements/index.html
Jeanne: first of three proposed
drafts
... after current prototyping phase they will do another
draft
... then another draft before working on a charter for rec
track work
... invite TF co-fac to put Silver on the agenda to raise
awareness and have discussion
... second project
... prototypes for Silver
... putting these out publicly to get comments
<LisaSeemanKestenbaum> can you repost the link to the requirments?
Jeanne: these are rough so it is more about testing the ideas
<LisaSeemanKestenbaum> and the protoypes
Jeanne: please show prototypes to
TFs
... we need to show that the prototypes can address the SC
proposals that couldn't make it into WCAG 2.1
... need help finding a good example (one!) of an SC proposal
that was deferred to silver
... what is really needed is how the SC would be tested if not
constrained by WCAG test model
... for LV
... people could customize the font/size/spacing/etc
... might be a good candidate for a rubric type test - if all
items can be adjusted then there is a score
... different score if can pass 2 or 5 or more of the
individual tests.
... so, need item that was deferred and how to test it, and the
answer doesn't need to be true/false
... John Rochford is working on accessible authentication
LS: For that one, once the web
auth spec is done that one should be easy to get in
... The two hardest ones are "easy language" and "familiar
design"
JS: would be great to get that information
<LisaSeemanKestenbaum> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WcfVALVq8PS9CLXUuAfV9Op0wXvI2yJYedj5jO23GTk/edit#heading=h.gmpmiu9yrnze
<LisaSeemanKestenbaum> https://www.w3.org/TR/coga-gap-analysis/#appendix-making-content-usable-for-people-with-cognitive-and-learning-disabilities
<LisaSeemanKestenbaum> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WcfVALVq8PS9CLXUuAfV9Op0wXvI2yJYedj5jO23GTk/edit?usp=sharing
JS: Can you pick one that might
be best and we can use that one?
... The focus now is on testability, so that focus may help
deciding which one
WF: how do we figure out what isn't very testable vs things that just need new metrics?
JS: What we are talking about is
doing new and broader metrics
... other topics I wanted to discuss can be handled via
email.
... interested in thinking about new ways to measure and
looking for additional ideas for tests
WF: Challenging but shouldn't be
unsolvable
... Thing that might help if the asks are more broken up - e.g.
"give us one SC that didn't make it"
... specific questions and challenges is helpful
JS: What we need is "what was important that couldn't make it?"
AWK: Do you know how to see these items in the Github repo?
https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues?q=is%3Aissue+label%3ADefer+is%3Aclosed
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues?q=is%3Aissue+label%3ADeferred+is%3Aclosed
JS: next topic - there will come
a point that the TFs should be looking at the deferred items
and thinking about what should get into silver
... Building the model first and then doing feasibility tests,
so collecting the feasibility items now
AWK: AGWG main group needs to focus on WCAG 2.1 T&U first
JS: We won't be ready soon either
<jeanne> Jeanne: 2019 at the earliest.
+AWK
+Jeanne
+MichaelC
+Kim
+Wilco
+Lisa
trackbot, end meeting
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/Lisa is check/Lisa will check/ Default Present: AWK, Jeanne, MichaelC, Kim, Wilco, Lisa Present: AWK Jeanne MichaelC Kim Wilco Lisa No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: AWK Inferring Scribes: AWK WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 01 Aug 2018 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]