<Charles> sorry. resolved.
<scribe> scribe:Jemma
charles: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-silver/2018Jul/0035.html
<Charles> http://code.viget.com/interactive-wcag/#role=&level=aa
<mikeCrabb> http://code.viget.com/interactive-wcag/#role=&level=aa
<jeanne> http://rishida.net/wcag/#_
<jeanne> https://www.w3.org/International/techniques/authoring-html?collapse
<Lauriat> +1 to testing their prototypes and getting them involved!
<KimD> *It's webaim
luis: will there be a version similar to other w3c spec?
jeanne: yes
... static document, usable version of silver doc will be there
so that people can find it.
<mikeCrabb> wcag https://github.com/w3c/silver/projects/1
<Charles> ideas: track the urls of prototypes; recruit the authors
<Lauriat> Nice! +1 to Mike's idea for tracking this progress.
jeanne: mike, can you look at the requirement doc whether you can see the change/feedback I made?
mikecrabb: yes
charles: having git hub for this is good so that we can market/socialize but we would need to have someone to review it.
<jeanne> https://docs.google.com/document/d/16ZXrFRmkB0O-RvYWD-frzzWUBFskloI5immHBwx38W0/edit
crab: I think we can quickly go over this based on previous research.
<jeanne> New Prototype measuring font sizes http://nosetothepage.org/TextAccessibility/FontCompare.html
jeanne: if you are not comfortable with working with git, you can add info to the above google doc.
<Jan> I will help look at Wayne's prototype
jeanne: he would like to get some input regarding his new prototype measuring font size.
cibele: we can also look at other style guide examples too.
zkim, take up next
jeanne: I do have an author who
offered us to use their formal usability testing lab at the end
of Sept.
... Shawn and I met Education Outreach Working group and EOW
gave some suggestions.
... we can talk about this in detail at next meeting agenda
charles: Next thing to do is identifying / soliciting participants for the testing -rolling base usability testing.
jan: what kind of usability testing mix, lab testing or remote user testing, are you thinking?
jeanne: my thinking is starting remote feedback regarding our prototype and improve, then open to formal usability testing.
we need to consider geographic diversity too.
mikecrabb: I can help with that my lab and resource
cibele: Also I can help to reach the audience in Canada
mikecrabb: so usability testing on Sept is good since I will have returning students to participate the testing
<Jan> Yes, sorry ... I mistyped my caller ID#, so I think I am call-in user 2. Sorry, Jemma!
<Charles> I think there will be a broad mix of testing types. Moderated and unmoderated. Remote and lab. Flow; click; preference; tree; etc.
<Charles> for the IA and information design testing, I would include a tree test like: https://www.optimalworkshop.com/treejack
jeanne: Jennison sent an email regarding IA help to the group(?)
<Charles> anything moderated will need a moderator and a moderator guide
mikecrabb: we also have some prototype to look into.
jeanne: please contact/identify/gather usability experts to get help on usability testing.
jan: I would like to suggest adding meeting topic to talk about criteria for recruiting the participants and more.
<Charles> if we get the “other prototypes” project set up in GitHub, I will sociallize it
jeanne: I shared require doc and
three prototypes with EO group.
... there were suggestions regarding what to be evaluated or
not
<jeanne> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1DvMcgEqUDY0_13hqJeeGpYHa1gX4YCK0sVBvahodERc/edit
jeanne: I also work with angela
what would be the possible questions regarding plain
language,
... please share some feedback about this survey before we send
this out to the list.
charles: how do we add feedback to the survey since the form would not allow adding comment?
lauriat: If it is simple comment, email will be fine. otherwise, we can use google doc.
jeanne: jennison, Mike and I are working on each silver requirement doc.
<jeanne> Jennison has drafted a response
<jeanne> Mike and I did updates
<jeanne> Add Certification and Conformance Claims to the Conformance prototype
<Jan> I would like to work on the concerns expressed by Mike Gower
jeanne: that will be great, Jan
shawn: this may be relevant to conformance model which Silver will end up.
<Jan> +1 to postponing that aspect of issue 19 until we have more guidance on how to address it.
Group talked about how to manage this feedback in git hub
so that the group can keep track of suggestions and feedback according to the timeline.
no problem.
RESOLUTION: Close Issue 19 as the Requirements document changes and open a new issue with the Conformance and Certification issues
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/send/sent/ Present: AngelaAccessForAll Jemma Charles KimD jeanne Lauriat kirkwood mikeCrabb LuisG Jan Regrets: Shari Found Scribe: Jemma Inferring ScribeNick: jemma Found Date: 27 Jul 2018 People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]