Moe is not in the meeting, moving this item to next meeting
Need more clarification on this?
Can be added in section 8. Where is possible indicate where it fails
Shadi thinks its an optional encouragement.
[Shadi] lets take something easy as an example. We dont know where the failure has occurred.
[AG] Take in outcomes to measure
[Shadi] this is for manual and semi automated tests
Need a proposal for this | SA
SA: Need a proposal for this
... take the action to look at this
MJ: Rule group of one or rule group of many
AT: already discuss this, moving to the next section
AG: small atomic logic can be bind together to make it one
<rdeltour> for the record, SiteImprove's proposed rewording of the "Rule Group" section: https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/211
MJ: better to have a standardize way
<rdeltour> I also created an issue about that today (I hadn't noticed PR #211): https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/issues/214
AG: shouldn't a rule group be treated a one rule
MJ: is it helpful to have tagging on test
rules
... Need opinion from Wilco on this
AG: Need minimum amount of information to get the outcome
SA: Wondering what is the 1st sentence means?
MJ: Its optional to provide additional informantion
SA: Do we need to capture details on pass.
MJM: No need to do anything on our end for this
SA: Asking here a numerical score
... Think way beyond the scope
<shadi> https://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2011/metrics/
SA: this is a much demanded topic. in terms of this group, we can looking to a community group to work on this
AG: This is out of scope for this group.