W3C

- DRAFT -

HTML meeting

17 Apr 2018

Attendees

Present
Léonie, chaals, xiaoqian, Shwetank, Scott, Patricia
Regrets
bruce, Terence
Chair
Chaals
Scribe
Léonie

Contents


<shwetank> joined

<shwetank> are we waiting for more people? or am I not hearing the audio properly?

Milestone progress

CMN: We have several open issues still.

#1296 Media capture

LW: In PR waiting for review

CMN: Will do that.

#1229 Meta-merge Custom Elements

CMN: The defined pseudo propertyty is in PR but only has one implementation.
... We could include but mark as "at risk".

LW: Do we have intent to commit from anyone?

CMN: Firefox has an open issue.
... There are three other tasks.
... One is short, 1 is straight forward, and both can be accomplished.
... The third needs more checking
... Which I will do tomorrow.

#1215 Build warnings

CMN: Think this should be closed.
... These things come up from time to time.

LW: Any objections to closing?

<Scott_O> none here

LW: Hearing none.

#794 Outline algorithm

CMN: Thought thias had been done.
... There is a PR that adds a warning statement.
... There are implementations of the algorithm, though none in browsers.
... I will merge this PR.

#564 Sequential navigation focus

LW: Assigned to Bruce

CMN: And to me

LW: Don't think it'll get done

CMN: No

LW: Bump it?

CMN: Yes

#300 Steps for scrolling into view

CMN: Ah, this is the one assigned to Bruce and me.
... Longstanding bug, equivalent issue in WHATWG also remains unresoved.
... Bump it?

LW: Yes

#291 Legacy ruby content

XW: Will do it after workers if there's time.

LW: Is this substantive or editorial?

XW: Substantive.

CMN: We could go to wide review saying we'll resolve this.

LW: To do that we need to document our proposed solution in the issue first.

XW: +1

CMN: Ok.

#262 window.open(URL, name)

CMN: Long standing issue
... There is enough of a solution to put something into the spec I think.

LW: We're running late on the WD update already.

CMN: It's straight forward to write the tests and run.

LW: Yves says he might be able to look at it tomorrow.
... But it's not a robust plan of action.

CMN: If not I'm prepared to go ahead without it.

LW: I think that's probably the best option.

#1075 Merge Web Workers

XW: Have looked at it.
... There are two implementations.
... but we ned tests.
... Chaals, how do we export the URLs?
... To link to our specs not WHATWG.

CMN: Let me look.
... Will you convert to markdown?
... Was planning to take the text and incorporate it.
... When do you expect to have a PR?

XW: Tomorrow.
... But still not sure how to do links.

CNM: If you post your PR, we can look at it there.
... But one option is to do it manually.
... Looks like there is only one link to the WHATWG.
... If you can put your PR in before 12pm UTC tomorrow, I can take a look.

WD update

CMN: We ant to get this shipped.
... Next Tuesday we ship what we've got.
... We send it for wide review at that point.
... We want to get as much of ^^ fixed as we can.
... Scott, Patricia, Shetank, can any of you pick up some of the other issues?

<chaals> handling focus API #564

<chaals> outline algorithm #794

<chaals> Shwetank to look at 564

<chaals> Scott to look at 794 and 300

<chaals> Chaals to focus on finishing 1229 then doing merge side of 1075

<chaals> xiaoqian to focus on testing side of 1075, then 291

Implementation report

LW: Have almost finished adding the changes to the draft report.
... Will have that finished in the next 30 mins.
... Have put the name of the person responsible for the PR or for mergint the PR into the notes.
... That person need to complete the test resuts.

F2F meeting

LW: We need to confirm who wil attend.
... People need to book travel and it's not rasonable to expect anyone to do that without confidence that the meeting will happen.

Shwetank: I will confirm this week.

Scott: I can do

LW: Likewise

CMN: I can go, and will ask Sangwhan to confirm.
... We've also asked Terence and Bruce.

LW: Shwetank can you let me have your visa requirements ASAp?

SD: Yes.

LW: We can post this to the WG then.
... I'll do so.

<scribe> scribe: Léonie

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.152 (CVS log)
$Date: 2018/04/17 11:45:17 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152  of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/propery/property/
Succeeded: s/chcking./checking/
Present: Léonie chaals xiaoqian Shwetank Scott Patricia
Regrets: bruce Terence
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: tink
Found Scribe: Léonie

WARNING: No date found!  Assuming today.  (Hint: Specify
the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.)
Or specify the date like this:
<dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002

People with action items: 

WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]