https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Apr/0002.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Mar/0040
Steven: Erik suggests that we use true/false instead of yes/no for consistency
Alain: There is a confusion between true and true(), but I'm OK with it
Philip: I'm OK
<scribe> ACTION: Steven to change function/@override to true/false
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2167 - Change function/@override to true/false [on Steven Pemberton - due 2018-04-11].
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Mar/0036
Steven: I made this change as
agreed.
... it was a big edit.
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Mar/0037
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Mar/0028
Steven: I forwarded it
... they said "The proposal looks good to us! I don't think
we'd really thought much beyond having a wrapper element, but
the suggested attributes seem reasonable, to allow the form to
be in some way self-contained. In particular, we agree that the
style attribute may be useful. Why not!"
... We have to decide whether to go with it.
... I suggest we wait for Erik to be here next week.
Alain: I'm OK with the proposal as is.
Philip: The issue doesn't prevent you from using a PI if you want.
<inserted> Steven: Decision next week
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Mar/0038
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Apr/0003.html
Steven: [describes email]
... My proposal is to drop Linking, and make the others have
the same attributes except UI COmmon
... I posted this quite late before the meeting, so we don't
have to make a decision now; put it off till next week
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Mar/0042
Steven: There is some small
amount of validation possible.
... eg
https://homepages.cwi.nl/~steven/forms/tests/HTMLFragment.xhtml
... Is it worth it?
Alain: The problem is checking
whether the regexp is good.
... HTML is not XHTML
... It's possible, but difficult to get right
Steven: I hear the feeling that it's not a good idea...
Steven: Still adding test
cases.
... a new version will be uploaded this week
Alain: about mediatype
... when you want to submit, for sent and response
... maybe use request- and response-
Steven: Quite a good idea
Alain: I need it
Steven: I'll take a look for next
week.
... I've been asked to give a course at the XML Summer School,
I hope to do XForms, still to be finalised.
[ADJOURN]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/TH/Th/ Succeeded: i|Topic: ACTION-2166: Unify output/label/help/hint/alert|Steven: Decision next week WARNING: Replacing previous Present list. (Old list: Alain._Philip, Steven) Use 'Present+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list, such as: <dbooth> Present+ Alain, Philip, Steven Present: Alain Philip Steven Regrets: Erik No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: Steven Inferring Scribes: Steven Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Apr/0002 Found Date: 04 Apr 2018 People with action items: steven WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]