<brucel> yo
<scribe> scribe: Léonie
CMN: The current milestone results in the WD we'll send out for wide review.
<xiaoqian> https://github.com/w3c/html/pull/1282
XW: We can close #227
... Almost done with the ruby one.
... Do you need help with Custom Elements?
CMN: Yes please.
SOH: Going to work through any updates to #1224 (article/section)
<brucel> Help with Custom Elements - yes please! It's a giant task & I dunno where even to start
SOH: Will finish #885
... #1214 is a lower priority.
<sangwhan> Yes I do
<sangwhan> It's a single pull request, but two tickets.
CMN: Will get to those this week
Sangwhan.
... Not sure how much else I'll do this week.
... Unless a PR says "X" and "Y" needs to review/approve, any
editor should feel able to do the review/merge.
... If the PR is substantive, then two editors should review
before it's approved by the second.
<sangwhan> The tricky bit about merging sometimes is that when the review is stale and turns out to have conflicts, it's unclear who's responsibility it is to clean that up.
<xiaoqian> brucel: how about starting with #1274?
CMN: Yes.
<sangwhan> (Custom elements is going to be a prime example of this when it lands, basically any pending PR should be cleared before trying to land that)
+1
<sangwhan> Workers is pending as it is pre-milestone
CMN: Progress?
<sangwhan> and it completely breaks the build
<brucel> I'll look at #1274 on Friday
<sangwhan> (pre-milestone as in, I don't want to make life hell for everyone else)
<sangwhan> Also, web workers references whatwg/html - so a bunch of references need to patched up
CMN: Not getting Workers into the spec makes things painful.
<xiaoqian> thanks brucel
CMN: But yes, references need
patching.
... if that's all that's holding oyu up, put them in and we'll
clean them up.
<sangwhan> At the moment, the spec refuses to build with workers WIP in there
CMN: Do you have a branch?
<sangwhan> Not at the moment, can try to push this weekend
CMN: Would be elpful if there was.
<sangwhan> Noted.
XW: I'll look at it if you make the PR.
CMN: We need to chunk up
this.
... Bruce and I have both done some work.
... Don't expect to have time to work on it this week.
... Will be around next Friday if you will Bruce?
<brucel> yes @tink
<brucel> yes @chaals (I mean)
CMN: Ok, we'll get some more done on Friday then.
<brucel> groovy
CMN: Anyone with spare time, help on Custom Elements is appreciated.
CMN: Regrets from Scott, bruce,
Terence, Patricia.
... Need to check with Shwetank.
... Question is whether to cancel or move.
... Moving is tricky, though not impossible.
<brucel> Delhi
XW: Would be good to have time to work on some things, tough a call would do.
CMN: If we turn it into a virtual meeting.
LW: Virtual meetings don't work
for me. Too much distraction.
... Is there a host there?
... When?
CMN: The week after?
... Need to sort this by email, and to sort it fast.
LW: Cancel Amsterdam anyway?
CMN: Let's move this to email.
<brucel> Would like to do f2f meetup, prolly can't do A'dam
<brucel> China not possible
@brucel could you do the following week?
<brucel> nope - conf season throughout May
<brucel> so need to go to TLV to synergize with The Man
<brucel> Hugs n kisses, all
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Present: xiaoqian sangwhan Scott_O Léonie Chaals Bruce No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: tink Found Scribe: Léonie WARNING: No date found! Assuming today. (Hint: Specify the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.) Or specify the date like this: <dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]