<renato> trackbot, start meeting
<trackbot> Meeting: Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Teleconference
<trackbot> Date: 19 March 2018
<renato> Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20180319
<renato> Chair: Ben
<scribe> scribe: michaelS
<scribe> scribenick: michaelS
https://www.w3.org/2018/03/05-poe-minutes
benws_: nobody objected
benws_: suggested to make the BP a ODRL CG document - can be easily edited over time
<victor> I agree with Renato's idea of moving the document to the Community Group
renato: agreed to this suggestion - best practices can be reflected
victor: agreed to that as one of the BP editors
ivan: ok, then we should think about closing down this Working Group
renato: agreed, sees no open issues pending
benws_: asked for other comments
victor: when will CG meetings start?
renato: after this WG was closed, expects in
1 or 2 weeks
... he will launch a Doodle for finding an agreed time
benws_: how can the CG continue editing the existing BP draft
renato: sees no problem in moving the document to the CG
benws_: may we use W3C Webex for the CG call?
ivan: he will forward this request to the W3C management, it will decide, not he
<renato> CG internal email list: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/internal-odrl/
ivan: the CG should have in internal mailing
list to share WebEx data only on this internal list
... regarding the Github POE repository: currently a team of 8 members
have writing permissions on it.
... is this what is required? He suggested to remove Serena and Stuart
and Simon
... Most of the future ODRL work should be done on the repository of the
CG
<renato> Best Practices now in the CG Repo: https://github.com/w3c/odrl/tree/master/bp
renato: has copied the content of the WG repository to the CG repository
ivan: some errata issues are still open
benws_: Most of the open issues are about the profile
michaelS: the current Profile Mechanism wording is quite strict - the latest discussion showed that the group has a wider view on that
renato: feels that a wider view should be written down
ivan: Such a change goes beyond an editorial change
benws_: all in the group feel that the current wording is quite open
ivan: might a changed wording result in a
different understanding how a Profile may be defined
... what should be changed should be clearly written in the issue 300
... the current REC should not be change - the document may be updated
in about 1 year
benws_: can the REC refer an erratum?
ivan: yes
renato: the ODRL CG will create a new wording of the Profile Mechanism
Note: the presentation of the current Profile Mechanism to IPTC people resulted in a quite strict understanding of what may be defined
ivan: what about meetings about ODRL - in
about 1 year
... or workshops
victor: what about a workshop at the TPAC in
autumn 2018
... he would attend it
<renato> The last ODRL International Workshop : http://virtualgoods.org/2011/
ivan: suggested to have a 2-3 hours
face-to-face meeting introducing ODRL
... and suggesting a full day workshop in spring 2019
<renato> This was it: http://www.virtualgoods.org/2013/
benws_: Such a presentation should be made of short presentation about ODRL implementations
michaelS: He will retire from IPTC as managing director this summer