<scribe> scribe: nigel
Nigel: Today, we have a joint meeting with i18n 1 hour into the meeting.
<Cyril_> Regrets for me. Cannot call. I will try to follow on IRC but unstable connection
Nigel: That's to deal with the
last remaining i18n issue on IMSC 1.1
... Today we have one TTML1 PR, may not need much
discussion.
... Then on TTML2 there's one agenda issue, ttml2#683.
... For IMSC there's the i18n issue which we'll cover in the
joint meeting.
... Anything else for the agenda?
Pierre: IMSC 1.1 signalling for
EBU-TT-D and SMPTE-TT and SDP-US.
... I think there's an issue we can close and a new one to open
to describe exactly what we
... are trying to do.
... We should pick a date for TTML1 3ED CR.
TTML1 3ED CR pull request ttml1#343
Pierre: There are no substantive changes, just work to meet pubrules etc.
Glenn: Part of that was making the changes for the new format style?
Pierre: Yes
Glenn: Did you copy the new code from TTML2 to do that?
Pierre: Yes I did, porting the
TTML2 DTDs and any other changes needed.
... Changing the http to https was a big change. There was no
change to the prose.
Glenn: Okay, go ahead then.
... I had to do that for TTML2, and I did it a slightly
different way. You put it in the part of
... the XSL that generates style headers, whereas there was
some equipment to generate
... additional header material. I will take a look - I think I
used an XSLT parameter also.
Pierre: Alright, we can fix that up the last minute.
Nigel: I've just seen an email
from Ralph Swick giving approval to transition TTML2 to
CR
... pending any comments on the chairs' list by end of day 12
March
... He notes: "One of the actions I asked Nigel to take to the
Working Group is to
... document the change policies for both the existing TTML
Role Name
... Registry and the new TTML Item Name Registry in those two
registries."
... We have discussed this before and our decision was to use
Group Consensus when
... deciding whether to make any change. So we will need to add
that to the registries themselves.
Glenn: That's not enforced by the wiki
Nigel: Correct, however we can
describe the policy on the page.
... We discussed ttml2#683 last week so I'm removing the agenda
label from that issue.
Glenn: I've had to wait for
travis to complete builds - now that it's done one I can
recheck
... against pubrules and links.
Philippe: Glenn, when will I get the document to publish?
Glenn: We have until the 13th,
which is 5 days. We have to get these two final editorial pull
requests
... merged, and as soon as those merges happen, I will create
the package for you.
Philippe: I need the package from you before the 12th so I can install it, and check it.
Glenn: If Nigel can approve those
today or at the latest tomorrow morning I should be able
... to get them to you by tomorrow close of business.
Philippe: I can do the work on the 12th.
Nigel: I noticed that we can easily create the package by creating a release tag in GitHub.
Glenn: There's one change to make, to rename index.html to Overview.html
Philippe: I can do that on my side.
Glenn: I'll create the release tag and check it and then send it to you.
Philippe: If I find a broken link etc then I'll let you know so it can be fixed in the repo.
Glenn: I changed the feedback
route to include the GitHub repo for raising an issue, in the
SOTD
... section, as well as the email option.
... Either one or the other.
Nigel: That's great, thank you.
action-509?
<trackbot> action-509 -- Pierre-Anthony Lemieux to Propose liaison text for the imsc 1.1 fpwd -- due 2017-10-12 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/509
Nigel: It looks like we haven't actually sent liaisons yet, but we published the FPWD in October.
Pierre: I think Thierry sent a big email to lots of people.
Nigel: That was for IMSC 1.1?
Pierre: Yes, October 2017
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2017Oct/0106.html
Nigel: That's a Horizontal Review one.
Pierre: Yes, and there's another
one...
... Thierry told us he also sent another email to external
bodies for review.
<plh> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-tt/2017Oct/0011.html
Philippe: That was BCCed to the intended recipients, so they are obscured.
close action-509
<trackbot> Closed action-509.
Pierre: Look at pull request
#322
... Profile signalling changes in IMSC 1.1 because it has
changed a lot on TTML2. One of
... the tweaks was to address signalling of profiles, and
there's a change needed here.
... I'd like to merge this pull request for everything except
the signalling issue, and open
... another issue and pull request for signalling.
... I can try to revert the changes made for signalling, or I
could merge this pull request
... as is and open a separate issue to clarify and improve
signalling of industry profiles
... into IMSC 1.1.
... Mike Dolan opened a separate issue on this topic.
Nigel: If we could merge in pull
#337 prior to merging this pull request, I'd be happy to
go
... with that second option.
Pierre: I'm happy to do that.
Nigel: Then we can have a
separate review of signalling after that and discussion and
see
... if there are any changes needed.
Pierre: We can use imsc#331 for
that.
... I'll merge this now.
Nigel: I've approved #322.
Pierre: Thank you, I'll merge that.
Nigel: We need to dial off this
call and join i18n now.
... [adjourns meeting]