W3C

- DRAFT -

Web Authentication Working Group Teleconference

07 Mar 2018

Agenda

Attendees

Present
gmandyam, weiler, wseltzer, Rolf, selfissued, apowers, jeffh, jcj_moz, akshay, Arnar, Christiaan, nadalin, JohnBradley
Regrets
Chair
Tony
Scribe
jfontana

Contents


<jeffh> equalsJeffH

<plh> Meeting: Web Auth Meeting

tony: we have a wd08

<jeffh> tony: preciatit

tony: wd08 psuhed out thanks to angelo
... some problems with the figures; JeffH is opening an issue

<weiler> preset+ jeffh, jcj_moz, akshay, Arnar, Christiaan, nadalin, JohnBradley, selfissued

jeffH: done

tony: we need people to review

JeffH: i have produced diff, so has JCJones

tony: phillipe and wendy anything more

<wseltzer> [nothing else from me]

Phillippe: I can help arrange the CR, Tim is out

phillipe: is there date you want CR published

tony: there is 7 day waiting.

phillippe: yes.

tony: wait the 7 days and then transition

phillippe: publish CR only on Tues. Thurs

Tony: the 20th. a Tuesday.
... once W3C has meeting amd approval comes, we can generate spec with CR title
... any other questions (no) can we move on ..

jeffH: there are linking errors in spec
... no a deal breaker
... will fix linking errors

tony: we have an issue from Giri; no milestone yet.

https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/823

tony: rolf or JeffH, weigh in?

jeffH: looks like a clarification

Phillippe: looks like more than editorial

tony: look slike a PR issue
... re-classified
... no CR issues other than the one jeffH has open
... assuming that gets fixed
... #501 we are OK, https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/501

https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/653

tony: is this still an issue?
... i don't think this is one we can do anything about now

selfissue: it is not spec work, it is tools.

jeffH: agreed

selfissue: I don't think it belongs to any milestone, it is a nice to have.

tony: I will pull this out for now. figure out where it goes from here

https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/821

jeffH: none of these have changed since last week

tony: we can move on

https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/825

tony: mike has approved it.
... anyone else want to look at it

<gmandyam> Assume nothing more needed from my end, re: https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/821

selfissued: I want Alexei to read this or another native russian speaker, the language has specific gender implications

Christiaan: I will get Alexei to read

apowers: I will get Yury to read also

JcJones: we might want to call out how uX works with our unicode
... we can include reference and don't so these thigns.
... i would be happy to write up a short explanation of the PR
... offering to write a PR
... needs guidance

jeffH: has looked at this stuff. right thing is to reference 8266 8264 and make it a should
... implementation should... shotting off cuff.. the nixname profile

selfissue: that sounds write to me.

jeffH: all this unicode is very narly

jcjones: I am good than, thanks.

tony: i don't see anything else

jeffH: want to get over the CR hump before we talk PR

tony: rolf says issue 433 can be closed
... we had rolf look at it, he said close

selfissue: is rolf on the call.

yes

rolf: I think it can close

selfissue: i will close
... registries. we ened to talk with sean turner and wendy in the room and JeffH

tony: we need to get that meeting scheduled

wendy is in the queue

meeting will be at IETF in London

tony: not yet scheduled

rolf: I have questions on section 9.4 and 5.10.1

this is issue 828

https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/828

selfissue: I will adress this, this is a spec bug

philippe: it looks to me that we might have a blog about this.

selfiseu: what is content for blog

philippe: is this biz as usual or something else

selfissue: this is about WebauthN as a game changer; yes, we should do that

tony; we should have this with the release of CR

<gmandyam> Selfissued, Will be in London; please keep me in loop on scheduling of registries meeting

<weiler> http://self-issued.info/?p=1791

<selfissued> The blog post I wrote last night is at https://self-issued.info/?p=1791

<selfissued> It's titled "W3C Web Authentication (WebAuthn) specification almost a Candidate Recommendation (CR)"

philippe: i thnk it does need to be expanded. how does it change some of the day to day issues.

tony: we will have blog post by the 19th

<plh> plh@w3.org

tony: nothing else? you can 10 minutes back

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.152 (CVS log)
$Date: 2018/03/07 18:48:58 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152  of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/shawn/sean/
Present: gmandyam weiler wseltzer Rolf selfissued apowers jeffh jcj_moz akshay Arnar Christiaan nadalin JohnBradley
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: jfontana
Inferring Scribes: jfontana

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.

Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2018Mar/0016.html
Found Date: 07 Mar 2018
People with action items: 

WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report


WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]