<jeffh> equalsJeffH
<plh> Meeting: Web Auth Meeting
tony: we have a wd08
<jeffh> tony: preciatit
tony: wd08 psuhed out thanks to
angelo
... some problems with the figures; JeffH is opening an
issue
<weiler> preset+ jeffh, jcj_moz, akshay, Arnar, Christiaan, nadalin, JohnBradley, selfissued
jeffH: done
tony: we need people to review
JeffH: i have produced diff, so has JCJones
tony: phillipe and wendy anything more
<wseltzer> [nothing else from me]
Phillippe: I can help arrange the CR, Tim is out
phillipe: is there date you want CR published
tony: there is 7 day waiting.
phillippe: yes.
tony: wait the 7 days and then transition
phillippe: publish CR only on Tues. Thurs
Tony: the 20th. a Tuesday.
... once W3C has meeting amd approval comes, we can generate
spec with CR title
... any other questions (no) can we move on ..
jeffH: there are linking errors
in spec
... no a deal breaker
... will fix linking errors
tony: we have an issue from Giri; no milestone yet.
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/823
tony: rolf or JeffH, weigh in?
jeffH: looks like a clarification
Phillippe: looks like more than editorial
tony: look slike a PR issue
... re-classified
... no CR issues other than the one jeffH has open
... assuming that gets fixed
... #501 we are OK, https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/501
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/653
tony: is this still an
issue?
... i don't think this is one we can do anything about now
selfissue: it is not spec work, it is tools.
jeffH: agreed
selfissue: I don't think it belongs to any milestone, it is a nice to have.
tony: I will pull this out for now. figure out where it goes from here
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/821
jeffH: none of these have changed since last week
tony: we can move on
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/825
tony: mike has approved it.
... anyone else want to look at it
<gmandyam> Assume nothing more needed from my end, re: https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/821
selfissued: I want Alexei to read this or another native russian speaker, the language has specific gender implications
Christiaan: I will get Alexei to read
apowers: I will get Yury to read also
JcJones: we might want to call
out how uX works with our unicode
... we can include reference and don't so these thigns.
... i would be happy to write up a short explanation of the
PR
... offering to write a PR
... needs guidance
jeffH: has looked at this stuff.
right thing is to reference 8266 8264 and make it a
should
... implementation should... shotting off cuff.. the nixname
profile
selfissue: that sounds write to me.
jeffH: all this unicode is very narly
jcjones: I am good than, thanks.
tony: i don't see anything else
jeffH: want to get over the CR hump before we talk PR
tony: rolf says issue 433 can be
closed
... we had rolf look at it, he said close
selfissue: is rolf on the call.
yes
rolf: I think it can close
selfissue: i will close
... registries. we ened to talk with sean turner and wendy in
the room and JeffH
tony: we need to get that meeting scheduled
wendy is in the queue
meeting will be at IETF in London
tony: not yet scheduled
rolf: I have questions on section 9.4 and 5.10.1
this is issue 828
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/828
selfissue: I will adress this, this is a spec bug
philippe: it looks to me that we might have a blog about this.
selfiseu: what is content for blog
philippe: is this biz as usual or something else
selfissue: this is about WebauthN as a game changer; yes, we should do that
tony; we should have this with the release of CR
<gmandyam> Selfissued, Will be in London; please keep me in loop on scheduling of registries meeting
<weiler> http://self-issued.info/?p=1791
<selfissued> The blog post I wrote last night is at https://self-issued.info/?p=1791
<selfissued> It's titled "W3C Web Authentication (WebAuthn) specification almost a Candidate Recommendation (CR)"
philippe: i thnk it does need to be expanded. how does it change some of the day to day issues.
tony: we will have blog post by the 19th
<plh> plh@w3.org
tony: nothing else? you can 10 minutes back
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/shawn/sean/ Present: gmandyam weiler wseltzer Rolf selfissued apowers jeffh jcj_moz akshay Arnar Christiaan nadalin JohnBradley No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: jfontana Inferring Scribes: jfontana WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2018Mar/0016.html Found Date: 07 Mar 2018 People with action items: WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]