<JohnRochford> I am on mute because I am in a public space.
<JohnRochford> Yes, I expect him to join.
<JohnRochford> Yes.
<JohnRochford> 71 this Sunday here is sunny Massachusetts.
<JohnRochford> Jim, I am now on the record to say I love when you say "Dang".
<JohnRochford> Bless your heart.
<scribe> Scribe: erich
<jallan> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-low-vision-a11y-tf/2018Feb/0037.html
<jallan> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-low-vision-a11y-tf/2018Feb/0045.html
<JohnRochford> With some irony, I could not see Alastair's infographics.
JA: Alastair was questioning infographics passing non-text contrast.
<laura> need to reboot.
<jallan> info graphics are difficult for text contrast let alone the image contrast
AC: Jim provided good interpretation of infographics
JA: Are we still searching for something that passes?
AC: Yes, let me check and I will send a link
<jallan> focus ring - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-low-vision-a11y-tf/2018Feb/0043.html
<jallan> ... could file bug on browsers for not support
JA: Could file a bug for browsers
<alastairc> Infographic example, several techniques: https://alastairc.ac/tests/assets/WCAG21-Infographic.png
<shawn> very nice!
<jallan> before and after to illustrate solving the problem
AC: I was able to have a designer create this example, was not able to find one otherwise
<alastairc> https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdsdigital/4729221809/in/datetaken/
AC: Finding examples that pass is helpful, as long as everyone agrees they pass
<alastairc> Looking for three steps:
<alastairc> 1. Which areas of the infographic is NTC (non text contrast) applicable?
<alastairc> 2. What are the graphical objects within it
<alastairc> 3. Do they have sufficient contrast
JA: Would text description work for #1?
AC: I think text description would be fine
JA: Best to find things that pass. It's easy to find failures, which leads to clutter
<jallan> find things that pass 2.0 text contrast, don't rely on color alone, and pass the 2.1 none - text contrast
<jallan> likely to be specific sections of the infographic.
<JohnRochford> Or, dare I say it, long descriptions?
<JohnRochford> Laura loves long descriptions.
<jallan> jim will create a wiki page with table, and three items with link to infographic
<laura> yes. i do. John.
<jallan> close item 1
JA: Pending issues seem to be getting addressed pretty quickly
<jallan> need to add sections to Requirements
<JohnRochford> FYI: There are Firefox extensions that do zooming.
<jallan> ... add hover SC info in section on Proximity of Related information
<jallan> ... add Non-text Contrast to section on Brightness and Color (mine understanings)
<jallan> https://alastairc.ac/2018/02/firefox-zoom-preferences/
JA: Link to the Firefox setting
toodle-loo
<laura> Thanks, everyone.
<laura> bye.
<jallan> trackbot, end meeting
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Default Present: Jim, Shawn, JohnRochford, Scott, Laura, Glenda, SteveRep, alastairc, SteveRepsher, Erich Present: Erich Glenda Jim JohnRochford Laura Scott Shawn SteveRep SteveRepsher alastairc Found Scribe: erich Inferring ScribeNick: erich Found Date: 22 Feb 2018 People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]