– DRAFT –
Dataset Exchange Working Group Teleconference

<PWinstanley_> * DaveBrowning are you joining on webex?

<DaveBrowning> Trying.... local tech problem I think

<PWinstanley_> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2018/‌02/‌06-dxwg-minutes

approve Feb 6 minutes

<SimonCox> +1

<LarsG> 0 (wasn't there...)

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1

<roba> +1

<DaveBrowning> +1

<annette_g> +1

<NicholasCar> +1

Resolved: approve Feb 6 minutes

open action items

Ixchel complete action 79 - respond to Ostein

Jaroslav_Pullmann: Rob responded to Chris Little

Action 76 - still needs a response to Ana B

<trackbot> Error finding '76'. You can review and register nicknames at <https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌track/‌users>.

PWinstanley_: Any other comments about use cases?

roba: No new ones

Profiles

PWinstanley_: have a definition - do we need to discuss more? There was email discussion

roba: Ruben replied tht he was ok

antoine: there has been reaction from kcoyle's email, mainly minor wording changes. Will these be done?

annette_g: Getting emails that don't have a reply reference

<alejandra> are you saying the emails we are getting from Github?

<roba> happy to accomodate changes as agreed.. at some stage need to move from wiki to a "home'

<annette_g> yes, they are from Github now that I look at them.

DCAT subgroup

alejandra: missed last call

Simon: had a call last Wednesday; small group; moved through issues quickly
… some issues resolved; details around modeling of dcat dataset, esp. subclassing from dcmi:type removed
… issues relating to scope, to allow to apply to types other than tabular datasets, and also to text

<AndreaPerego> DCMI Type vocabulary: http://‌dublincore.org/‌documents/‌dcmi-terms/#section-7

Simon: would use dct: type as a way to define that; should resist strong instruction to use dct, and making it possible to use other
… this is a pull request ready to go
… relaxing domains and ranges (discussion for tomorrow)

PWinstanley_: are you happy with speed of progress?

SimonCox: Not really known yet, but picking up
… working mainly on fundamental questions, but others should make suggestions
… e.g. versioning

alejandra: adding: had another call last week, discussed that expect to talk about different issues, goal to resolve by FPWD
… where those aren't yet resolved, that will be highlighted in document of FPWD

<SimonCox> highlighting an issue, e.g. https://‌w3c.github.io/‌dxwg/‌dcat/#class-dataset

content negotiation group

LarsG: Not much to report (RobA concurs)

PWinstanley_: What can be done to help this group complete?

alejandra: are there minutes from that group?

roba: there were just 3 of us, so there weren't minutes; no decisions were made; will use minutes in the future
… There is one requirement that hasn't yet been articulated: for conneg there is a question of identifying profiles (IRIs? registered short names?)
… This is still an open question, but the profile guidance and conneg will have to be in sync on this

PWinstanley_: We still have dsr's survey on the agenda; will keep it until done

?+

AndreaPerego: Logistics - for subgroups IRC not followed by tracker; probably Dave needs to fix
… Also the mailing list and actions are not communicating (email doesn't show on tracker)
… needs w3c team contact

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> Best wishes!

<riccardoAlbertoni> congrats !!!

<roba> +1

<LarsG> bye all

<riccardoAlbertoni> bye!

<AndreaPerego> Thanks, and bye!

<alejandra> thank you, and bye!

<annette_g> bye!

<AndreaPerego> s/PWinstanley_: content negotiation group:/topic: content negotiation group/