<inserted> scribenick: kaz
Darko: we need to set a goal
... [Goal]
... what is the goal related to semantic interoperability that we want to demonstrate?
... [Guideline for semantic interoperability]
<scribe> scribenick: mjkoster
Darko: extend the plugfest
templates to include guidance and get information
... need to define iotschema requirements
... we are also defining requirements for the Thing
Directory
... also, we can start to engage external participants for
example OCF
<inserted> scribenick: kaz
darko: [Further proposals]
... Koster, maybe you can make some report on the plugfest?
Koster: several calls for
preparation for plugfest
... next step soon for the questionnaire template
... the area working on semantic interoperability
... protocol binding automation
... continue to work on proxies
... improving semantic interoperability
... security
... accessibility
... everyone to get common understanding
... design pattern guidance for semantic interoperability
... in the questionnaire, question on discovery
... added another thing on thing directory
... next selection criteria for application
... how to choose action, events, etc.
... register information to thing directory
... how the clients use it
... how does the client get information they look for
... semantic annotation to be exposed to clients
... how does the proxies work with thing directory
... we're ready to get input from people
... for convergence
... how we develop scenarios
Darko: ok
... how to define scenarios?
... what are available?
... e.g., I have a switch
... and need a lamp
... to interact with
... query to the thing directory?
... to deal with multiple air conditioners?
... the question is who is posting the question
... we should generate that kind of scenarios
Fano: working on IoT
... interested in AI
... user application and semantic web technology
... participating in ETSI as well
Koster: looking for workflow
... common background
... RESTful hyper state state machines
... multicast involved, other network configuration as
well
... how to discover things
... how the network messages work
... how to build semantic annotation?
... how to structure the framework?
... register things and deploy them
... protocol to do that
... breaking things into workflow is needed
Darko: have you started concrete work on the workflow?
Koster: it's really part of the way
what we're describing things
... the common thing with the scenario
... e.g., discovery
... some way for doing the data flow and logic for
application
... maybe more of a framework
Darko: scenario with workflow
... participants will follow it
... e.g., discovery could be done by asking somebody like the
directory
... how to generate TD and script?
... different parts within the workflow
Koster: the way we use the
concept
... structure with guidance
... how we do discovery, e.g., by SPARQL query
... how the server builds Things
... without learning the detail of RDF
... would like to break down materials I'm working on
... it's sort of a model
... another model about how the annotation works as well
... let's figure out what the common pattern is like
... any questions? comments?
Kaz: please provide your slides
for the minutes :)
... next
... we should create the template questionnaire to gather
scenarios as we already discussed during the plugfest call on
Wednesday
Koster: by the next web call, I'd
like to create the template questionnaire
... including functionality
... might be more than one thing directory
... need to put this on the (github) wiki
Darko: is the goal include specifying use cases?
Koster: we should make some
recommendations
... put together actual use cases
... we had cross-domain use cases but those were quite basic
ones
... can go back and provide some
... seems like people tend to add some more
... item about application
Darko: we need template
information
... we can prepare semantic artifacts
... we had a few scenarios
... for the previous plugfest
... we can pre-define some scenarios
... maybe same scenarios as the one for Burlingame
Danh: we should list scenarios and
identify what's feasible
... it's right time to create a wiki or something to clarify
actual scenarios
<DarkoAnicic> Plugfest preparation: https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/plugfest/2018-prague/preparation.md
Danh: who implements which
part
... e.g., semantic features to be solved
Darko: posted the link to the
plugfest prep page
... above
Danh: rather than generic use cases, we need to clarify how to handle security, etc.
Darko: (adds several topics)
... create a separate scenario page including the
workflow
... semantic integration section with hands-on guidance and
examples
Danh: elaborate implementable level
Kaz: +1
... we should clarify the scenarios with concrete settings
Koster: possibly using a separate
page
... that's good
Darko: there is another dedicated
call for plugfest
... how to proceed?
Koster: can provide the overall
questionnaire
... and maybe should get someone from this LD TF to submit some
more stuff
... would like to harmonize with the basic template
Danh: can elaborate my expertise
Darko: need to start with the overall questionnaire
Danh: we can't go far from the
general template
... can have some more dedicated calls for further
discussion
Koster: ok
... and we should cooperate with McCool about security
Kaz: are you suggesting we have yet another slot?
Koster: we can use this LD slot for
that purpose
... this slot is used bi-weekly and we can use another
bi-weekly part for that additional discussion
Darko: ok
Koster: wanted to run through the
slides some more (e.g., TD annotation capability, interaction,
data item...) but we should do that next time
... people are encouraged to read the slides
Darko: so people are encouraged to
join the main plugfest call on Wednesday
... and we can have further discussion next Friday
Kaz: that's good
... but possibly I can't make the call next Friday, on Feb. 9
[adjourned]