Stein Erik: How do we handle issues and editors note when the draft is published
Wilco: We'll keep the notes/issues when publishing
<Wilco> "An expectation is a statement that must be true about each test target (see Applicability)." Suggest clarifying what we mean by an Expectation by stating, " An expectation is a conformance statement that must be discrete and true about each test target"
AG: All of my images have alt atributes.
That is a positive statement that your material conforms. I found images
that lack alt texts that is a negative statement.
... an expectation is a statement that you are making about an aspect or
element being conformant rather then a conformance statement
Shadi: If we use the word conformance we
exclude advisory rules in the future
... conformance statement or statement of conformance may narrow it down
more than we intend to
AG: Exectation is a statement I expect to be true
No objections to leaving the draft as it is
<scribe> ACTION: Wilco: open an issue for discussion on performance statements
<trackbot> Created ACTION-25 - Open an issue for discussion on performance statements [on Wilco Fiers - due 2018-02-08].
Wilco: Comment from Romiane on points where notes should be added to the draft
<Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/issues/162
Shadi: To what degree is the output format a part of this particular spec
Wilco: It is not, but I can ad a comment in editors notes that we are reviewing how much detail we need from the output format
<Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/issues/164
AG: Would only have one test, as applicability is tested by proxy.. We wouldn't assert a pass or a fail but our array of results look like this
No editors note will be included for issue 164
<Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/issues/165
No editors note for issue 165 is needed
Wilco: I'll make sure we make the note for 162
Shadi: Suggests a CFC for final approval
<Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/168/files
Wilco: pull requests, mostly editorial.
Shadi, it is customary to include the title of the standard/specification in the abstract
<Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/170/files
Wilco will merge pull requests before doing a CFC
Wilco: 3 yes, 1 yes with changes.
... thinks Deltour is right to add CSS selectors to rules examples. Also
a link to previous version.
Shadi: Where is the template? I have a related comment.
Wilco: No template at the moment.
Shadi: Rules are taken from Auto-WCAG. How do people feel about adding an acknowledgement section?
<Wilco> https://auto-wcag.github.io/auto-wcag/rules/SC1-1-1-aria-describedby.html
Mo: Should we have a project page or github page
Shadi: May be better to keep it in the
footer
... Demonstrate the author/person, the source and potential inputs from
the group
<Wilco> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/conformance-testing/wiki/Talk:ACT_Review_Process
Shadi: Some comments in the wiki
Stein Erik: Suggesting pushing the item to next meeting
Wilco puts this into a pull request in the ACT-Rules repository