<RubenVerborgh> Can we split "Profiles" on the agenda into Guidance and Negotiation, as discussed last time?
<RubenVerborgh> Because both need slots etc.
<dsr> sorry that won’t work
<dsr> should be this one https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m9fcad33ce544e4f753e2d472bbb8efa8
Introducing new DXWG member: Armin Haller
Voting on minutes from last meeting
<Caroline> +0 (was not there)
+0 (missed last call)
<RiccardoAlbertoni> 0 (missed the call)
<RubenVerborgh> 0 (missed)
Resolved: Minutes approved
Resolved: Minutes approved
<Makx> sorry comment on minutes. I am not listed as present
<SimonCox> presednt+ SimonCox
<Makx> please amend minutes of last week
Was there any feedback on UCR document?
<Caroline> Jaroslav_Pullmann: I don't think we had any feedback yet
DaveBrowning: Feedback from my organisation
… Dave will forward via the public feedback email
There is apparently no cut off date for UCR feedback?
Summary: members use the public-dcat group, externals are requested to comment via firstname.lastname@example.org
DaveBrowning: our feedback will not be there before early February
Caroline: We should think of which other W3C working groups might provide us with feedback
kcoyle: It could be e.g. the SHACL and POE groups
<AndreaPerego> SDWIG was already informed by Linda - see end of mail here https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdwig/2017Dec/0008.html
kcoyle: I will contact SHACL and the Public Shapes List
<annette_g> maybe Dave Raggett can do it?
Question being discussed: which of the group's mailing lists to use..
roba: there are couple of reused vocabularies in our documents
… we sholud somehow mention this in profile definitions (e.g. profile using SHACL)
<alejandra> wouldn't you come up with more requirements for those groups in that case?
roba: it's still a bit open how to express the aligment with those groups
kcoyle: need to contact experts to elaborate what the "links" are
kcoyle: we may suggest usage of those vocabularies or enter deeper negotiations
<kcoyle> +1 to Dave's "editorial" comment
DaveBrowning: we should have a consistent approach for referencing those vocabularies
<AndreaPerego> Contacting the relevant groups could be also useful to validate the proposed use of these vocs - this was done, e.g., in GeoDCAT-AP for PROV.
Action: DaveBrowning: Contact POE-cochair to provide feedback on UCR document
<trackbot> Created ACTION-73 - Contact poe-cochair to provide feedback on ucr document [on David Browning - due 2018-01-23].
Action: kcoyle to contact SHACL and ShEx lists regarding UCR FPWD
<trackbot> Created ACTION-74 - Contact shacl and shex lists regarding ucr fpwd [on Karen Coyle - due 2018-01-23].
<Caroline> Jaroslav_Pullmann: I will contact Rob about the action 50 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/50
<AndreaPerego> I'm working on action 59 - should be completed within next week.
<roba> there are others on this group even more deeply connected with sensing ontologies
<Caroline> Jaroslav_Pullmann: about action https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/72
<roba> simon, armin, andrea perhaps
SimonCox explains how to import the UCR requirements into GitHib for better managment
<alejandra> I doubt there is already something for respec because I don't think there is a consistent way for groups to create their UCR documents
Caroline: Meeting schedules for DCAT
<Caroline> Wednesdays, 20:00 UTC
SimonCox: First telcon will start tomorrow
SimonCox: asking for process how to mediate the calender invitations
dsr: we must not share telcon details with people outside
<alejandra> I'll write down my question as can't speak now - was wondering if the issue about generating the minutes for tomorrow has been sorted?
SimonCox: in the first call we will establish roles/task for work on DCAT
<alejandra> no, we didn't
Questions on irc minutes integration etc. to Dave - support to DCAT group requested
<AndreaPerego> There should be a page somewhere explaining exactly what should be done to start meeting, draft minutes etc. - cannot find it now.
Waiting for Dave's audio to set-up
<dsr_> I am not sure about better RRSAgent integration - you can use agenda: URL for the minutes
<dsr_> and then copy the URL from the rrsagent, make minutes command to to the wiki
<SimonCox> +1 AndreaPerego
<AndreaPerego> @dsr, Is there a reference page for this?
There is no page like suggested by Andrea, to be written yet
Action: kcoyle look for page describing rrsagent as affects sub-group work
<trackbot> Created ACTION-75 - Look for page describing rrsagent as affects sub-group work [on Karen Coyle - due 2018-01-23].
<alejandra> will there be a meeting this Thursday?
RubenVerborgh: there are (plans) for 2 sub groups: 1) Profiles/Conneg and 2) Guidance
RubenVerborgh: few reaction to doodle, only 3 members interested
<roba> * my network is cutting out - apologies if missing anything
RubenVerborgh: connecg doodle had few (3) responses so far
<AndreaPerego> About how to start meeting etc., just find out these details were included in the meetings pages of SDWWG - via a macro, I guess - e.g.: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:SSN-Telecon20170314#Dial_In_details
<RubenVerborgh> 4 mins is short… :-)
Dave has difficulties to connect / report about the ODI survey
Caroline: announces a workshop on ..
Data Privacy Controls and Vocabularies on 17-18. April, Vienna
<RubenVerborgh> thanks, bye!
<RiccardoAlbertoni> bye !
<alejandra> bye, and thanks all!
Succeeded: s/I'm working on it - should be completed within next week./I'm working on action 59 - should be completed within next week./