<scribe> scribenick: weiler
tony: we put a call for consensus
on the list, for using wd07 + issues marked for CR as the CR
version.
... would appreciate responses
... There's a publishing milestone of 13 Dec (today), because
of W3C holiday publication blackout. We won't meet that. The
timeline I have in mind is a transition request on 2 Jan.
... That assumes we have consensus.
jfontana: working on transition
doc. We're waiting for reviews.
... I sent emails again seeking those.
weiler: we may need to wait re: reviews - we didn't ask for those earlier in the process, and we may need to wait for them now.
nadalin: Rolf has this. I think we're still waiting for jyasskin and alexei.
giri: I need jeff and emil's approvals.
jeff: next week
nadalin: jyasskin not here today. Rolf had issues... Jeff had issues...
<jyasskin> I can join. One second.
nadalin: not sure if we need this for CR or not
giri: it's an .md file change - i don't think it's a CR issue
nadalin: possible PR issue; needs to be done by then
nadalin: this is angelo's.... Jeff & Jyasskin asking for changes.
jyasskin: I've gotten pulled off of webauthn in favor of web packaging. anyone else to take this?
nadalin: [explains timeline again]
jeffh: happy to take it, but I
think Jan 2 is highly aspirational. (3 weeks away) I'm gone
week after Xmas.
... I'd prioritize doing other PRs first and getting those
merged before this new work.
nadalin: trying to set some goals to get progress.
akshay: I can take this; I want someone to review after I make the changes.
nadalin: jeffrey, will you review?
jyasskin: yes.
... push it to my branch.
nadalin: angelo, would you review comments?
angelo: later this week
jeffh: early next week
emil: you recommended copying a passage... can we just do that?
<elundberg> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/666#discussion_r155356806
weiler: copy it.
wseltzer: copyright not an issue. good practice to give attribution, since it's not mere fact.
jeffh: +1
emil: will do.
jeffh: looks good to me.
nadalin: go for it.
emil: we said we'd wiat for 705, since they touch same things.
nadalin: it has a branch conflict....
nadalin: johan is gone for rest of year....
jeffh: this could wait.
nadalin: yes, could wait for PR. also still have IPR outstanding.
Rolf: it's just half a sentence. what if I just create a PR on the same
wseltzer: this is a patent issue, not copyright. which is why we're being diligent.
nadalin: wendy, why is it set up so someone not in group can create PR?
wseltzer: would we rather not hear from them, or hear from them and ask f/u q's? we can always reject PR. Our thought is that it's more helpful to get input from broader public and check IPR later.
nadalin: I don't like this route...
wseltzer: WRT this one specifically, we've been following up with them. we had email issues. we've gotten past that.
nadalin: johan has others in here - it's good to get him in the system.
jeffh: i need to look at emil's comments. friday.
nadalin: christiaan is away... agl, maybe?
agl: sure.
<jeffh> others are also invited to review #705 :)
akshay: me too
jeffh: looks good to me.
nadalin: angelo?
angelo: I think it's okay. will double-check.
nadalin: no issues?
agl: will merge.
nadalin: i think this is ok.
jeffrey?
... anyone else available?
jeffh: looking now.
jyasskin: looks fine.
agl: two word change....
emil: i'll merge this and f/u on comments in another pr.
giri: why is this not flagged as CR?
jeffh: we have not-triaged issues and someone should triage.
nadalin: I'll go back through this list.
jeffh: can we do them on the call?
nadalin: some people should add themselves to the proper lists.
selfissued: I plan to incorporate jeff's feedback. if anyone wants different credit, put a comment on the issue.
nadalin: I think many have contributed to text and I'd like to see them as editors, also.
agl: this is a result of addressing issue 599
and 723 addresses an issue tagged CR
so 723 should be tagged CR.
giri: 724 same story.... except issue is 679 ... better sooner than later because people care about interop.
nadalin: tag as CR, but OK to push it to PR
nadalin: this is also a
CR....
... 717 should be CR
... I think all PRs have milestones marked.
<jeffh> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/725
nadalin: issue 725.... https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/725
giri: predefined ext's not
consistent w/ each other
... this is fixable but defn is not sufficient for an
authenticator developer. some ext defs may not conform w/
requirements in previous section. both sections need
fixing.
... need to more tightly define ext in section 9.
... e.g. what should ext defn's say re: client ext input et
al
... only problem is that I didn't write those ext's. and we've
been letting proponents edit their own ext's.
... are folks willing to let me edit this?
... e.g diff between CBOR text string v. CBOR map.
... whoever wrote this was conforming to req of section9, which
is why I think section 9 should change.
nadalin: I put you and mike on this.
selfissued: I know certain indiv ext's need polishing, but I worked on general language. if changes needed to general language, give me specific suggestions.
giri: just wanted to ask, since these would be last-minute changes
nadalin: could these wait to PR?
giri: either way. but we will get comments on this. inconsistent ....
nadalin: I'll tag it as CR
Consider using "parse JSON from bytes"
emil: nice but not necessary
nadalin: I'm assigning this to
PR. if we get nothing, we let it go.
... this leaves all issued as classified. TDB if we got it
right. :-)
... so about 30 open issues for CR.
... How many of these can we get done before people
disappear?
nadalin: no call on 27th.
... will have a call on Dec 20th and Jan 3rd
weiler: there was an agenda item of interop; anything to say about that?
nadalin: we had talked about week
of Jan 26th, w/ FIDO, in bay area. people are free to do online
testing before that. we left it as Fri, Jan 26th at Google, I
think....
... will settle that when Christiaan is back. but jc, angelo,
and christiaan seemed happy with that. wd07 as basis.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/717/[various]/ Succeeded: s/also/all/ Succeeded: s/he had/we had/ Present: weiler elundberg wseltzer nadalin akshay battre gmandyam agl Rolf jfontana John_Bradley jeffh selfissued jyasskin apowers angelo Found ScribeNick: weiler Inferring Scribes: weiler Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2017Dec/0162.html Found Date: 13 Dec 2017 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]