<JohnRochford> Can't get into WebEx
<jallan> scribe: jallan
sh: any questions or comments?
... EO will be helping with usability and readability.
gs: EO to act as editors
sh: Editorial suggestors... no direct editing only suggestions
... AG and understanding editors to have final say
... still working on tracking tool use and communication channels.
close item 1
close item 2
<shawn> scribe: shawn
Jim: Will fix typos
... like tool. shooting for Grade 8?
Laura: Great if can do grade 8
Steve: Won't get to survey until next week
Jim: Will leave survey open
<jallan> here is survey: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/81151/understanding/
[Jim reviews Laura's comments]
Steve waiting for CfC to go through before polishing the Understanding docs
Jim: A little difficult to read - maybe too engineering speak. [@@ specific example]
... happy to help. Or wait.
Steve: Was planning on editing the Intro. Rewrite Visible Trigger. Add other user cases. Usually write first and go back to break up sentences. :-)
Jim: Edit in wiki, or send to you?
<Glenda> I highly recommend using http://www.hemingwayapp.com to write in super clear ways!
Steve: Not edit that branch. Do another branch or send in e-mail.
Glenda: I use Hemmingwayapp - find really powerful.
SLH: Some EOWG folks like that app, too.
Glenda: A game - get fewer colors. ;-) Although not fully accessible. :(
... rewarding to use.
... it gives Readbility Grade, too.
Jim: notes on 141 Use of Color - some examples would help
Glenda: Yup. Wonder if instead of writing huge Understandings, we write those as Techniques? Otherwise Understanding gets unwieldly and we still have to write techniques.
... will be better prepared to attack it after Dec publication.
Jim: Concern that if too spare, then they don't get idea unless read all Techs.
Glenda: Sure. You can help me watch for that.
Jim: graphic object examples, maybe have one for line chart, too.
Glenda: Yup. Great feedback.
Jim: In gradients, it triggered the transparency
Glenda: Yup. Will need to be added.
Jim: Where does icon fonts fit? If they do or not, say it.
Glenda: ahuooa?
... font is text, but we need to clarify that.
Jim: and point to relevant SC elsewhere
... Which readability scale do you use in that tool? Different scales give different values...
Laura: average on top
Jim: "RATS" read all the screen
Glenda: What aim for?
John: Suggest 5 or below
Glenda: But given our audience... developers, designers, proj leads. Would love to go to Grade 5, don't think realistic. Can live w/ 8. Can prefer 5, but don't think we can get there.
Laura: EO can help
Shawn: Even for EOWG docs, we don't require that low.
<laura> thanks.
trackbot, end meeting