<lisa> https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics
+present
<lisa> scribe: thaddeus
<lisa> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/Identify_common_purposes_CFC/results
2 relevant WCAG Success Criteria
<lisa> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/Contextual_Information_CFC/results
Contextual Information SC is AAA is is currently at risk
may not go in
Michael has clarification - not at risk to be removed before candidate recommendation
when it gets CR would be marked at risk
SC criteria is available to view in the current working draft
<lisa> The new SC can be viewed here: http://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/purpose_of_controls_changes3/guidelines/index.html#identify-common-purpose
Previously named "purpose of controls" now named Common Purposes for User Interface Components
http://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/purpose_of_controls_changes3/guidelines/index.html#commonpurposes
Other action items
<lisa> Sharon is offering to do the logs (includes the steps and other related attributes)Becky is doing help type, including moreinfo ,Extra help ,help type
Shannon - logs
Becky - help types
Thaddeus - Reminders
<lisa> ACTION: thaddeus working on proposal for reminders
<lisa> ACTION: sharron working on proposal for logs
<lisa> ACTION: becky working on proposal for help types
Open conversation Do we want two ways of doing things between types. Could be redundancy
With help and alternative language currently both can be used as an attribute and as metadata
3 Modules: content, tools, help
<lisa> https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics/#additional-wai-aria-roles
also have alternative roles - link here
above
Open coversation - should these be added to the content section
<lisa> https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics/
Original suggestion was to implement as landmark roles but slow down acceptance
<lisa> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/101569/newvaluesmodule1/results
Reviewing survey feedback among the group
goal is to get foundation level features in and keep a record of more advanced feature for possible future conversation/implementation
Lisa asked if someone could put together terms for sort
should we put a proposal for sort? no +1s
<lisa> confirm
<lisa> +1
+1
<lisa> adress field
<lisa> is fine
anything else missing in action or field?
leaving poll items open for one week.
Please review
and comment
distractions - poll results indicate that this needs work
volunteers to work on distractions?
<lisa> veifiable claims
sponsored content may be unclear to some users
the word "sponsored content"
janina to connect with verifiable claims
lisa to make a survey with each item individually
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Present: MichaelC Roy janina Becka11y thaddeus Found Scribe: thaddeus Inferring ScribeNick: thaddeus WARNING: No meeting title found! You should specify the meeting title like this: <dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth WARNING: No date found! Assuming today. (Hint: Specify the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.) Or specify the date like this: <dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002 People with action items: becky sharron thaddeus WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]