<Judy> scribe: George
<Judy> NEXT MEETING DATE IS DECEMBER 6TH
Today is an off cycle meeting and we return on Dec 6
JB: TPAC Feedback
... There is a survey form that W3C wants you to respond
to.
... Any particular feedback on venu and how it was
facilitated.
MC: The accessibilityguidelines working group did not get their meetings done and we scrambled to set up new rooms. Perhaps we can plan to have some spare rooms around to anticipate this.
JB: This is unprecidented in groups needing extra space. How necessary is this? Good job in getting the extra time.
MC: Seeking feed back from others. Not unprecedented, but not common.
<Judy> s/unpresented/unprecedented/
JS: Coga folks were looking for
space. They were looking for a way to get together. APA tried
to give space when they were visiting others.
... Apa did6 or 7 joint meetings.
JB: Does APA need a bigger roo
MC: We have had problems with minutes and when we meet in our own space, the minutes are easier to generate.
JS: We need that URI for the minutes.
JB: What can we do to resolve for the next one.
JS: Going through the minutes
now.
... Oh boy, no topic headers, will be a problem.
JB: It sounds like it would be could to solve this before next TPAC and a way to do a standard request for loging that goes out weeks ahead.
MC: We did get topic headers.
JB: APA logistics challenging.
JS: We had a lot of people who
needed a microphone.
... ARIA had mics and it was very useful.
TS: It would be wonderful to have a mic.
JB: why not request mic?
MC: Not an option.
TS: when you request a phone, you should have a mic that integrates.
<Judy> [JB: Ask meeting planners to assume mic request by default]
MC: large rooms should have mics for phones.
JB Anything else on logistics?
MC: MC had to run accross the hotel to make connections.
JB What MC is saying is more precise. Is there a formulae to make accessibility groups to get together.
JB: MC got his workout.
<Judy> [JB: Ask meeting planners to schedule meetings with the same TC next to each other.]
JB: anything else?
<Judy> scribe: Judy
GK: There were some things I attended, perhaps Wednesday, separate breakouts, that were very good. We want to make sure that we are coordinating among packaging, media, and issues around a single manifest, when we are trying to solve the same problems.
<scribe> scribe: George
JB: past logistical.
... On to TPAC meetings and hallway meetings.
... What to capture?
JS: Navigation came up in several
contexts. We have on agenda for CSS.
... I am convinced we will not have a single solution and we
should find pateerns.
... Halwwy Don Brutzman, Web 3D rep, Our follow up with him is
he will come to a RQTF?? This will probably be relevant for
publishing.
JS Input events FYI the Web Platforms is trying to improve content editable, and great looking formatting.
JS: Their spec to date does not
have a problem, but the accessibility review needs to happen.
Jonie did take an action item to work on this.
... Web Platform group for the spec, Jonie will write an AAM.JS
Are they done with Web Platforms
... They are not finished with input events. and bring it
closer to a desktop to desktop.
... They are ready to receive request for improvements. They
need to prioritize.
... the requests could get complicated by changing modes and
start writing math.
... Those are the big items that other groups need to know.
MC: The big cross-group topic
this year was accessibility object model discussion.
... The venu AOM people are from the non W3C mindset.
... They did attend TPAC and they interested in establishing a
coordination mechanism.
JB: Next steps there? And in what venue?
MC: Formally the web incubater group. We identified a path and we identify interesction paths ARIA.
JB: MC how many browser vendors present?
MC: Apple and Google where there. Microsoft present. Mozilla back channeled.
TS: W3C and MDM Don and Dan
applequist looking at information automating in.
... automate information from github and can improve in how we
write specs.
... MDN Mizilla developer network. Spec writers and best pract
practice writers are different and trying to figure out ways to
expidate something like this.
<MichaelC> s/MGM Don/MDN Dom/
TS: Publications has nothing in MDN
JB Is there a good way to corrdinate and follow up?
<Zakim> tzviya, you wanted to mention mdn
TS: next step for epub is to get it into MDN.
JB: TS report back.
JD: AOM making good
progress.
... ARIA is not just doing ARIA work, but AOM is being
supported and the two groups are supporting each other.
... Should web components use AOM or ARIA? and AOM needs stuff
from ARIA.
MC: Big success of AOM is that
AOM and ARIA should share the same vocab and ensure we have
cross coverage. THis allows implementers to use the most
appropriate.
... From this meeting they have expressence to tie to ARIA.
JD: Aria is a dependence of AOM.
JB: Other things in task force or heard from a little bird?
JB On Wednesday breakout or report are there things that peeked interest of accessibility?
TS: In epub, we have media
overlays. We will be starting a community group. Dave singer
connected TTML working on similar.
... Marisa from DAISY is heading this up.
GK: This came up in video discussions and packing and they were kean to work with the publishing folks.
JS: I had a conversation with Nigel from BBC on these topics. JS is to find old proposals on transcipt.
JS Nigel Megitt from BBC
JB: Kim, if you could follow remotely? Bad internet access.
Kim: I did check minutes and there was an issue with short cuts.
Minutes seemed good.
GK: Karen noted when she took minutes, they remote people and from other languages thanked her.
TS: Karen did good!
JB: Covered TPAC debrief.
... Check in on milestones and publications.
JMC: Plan to update WCAG 2.1, but will not happen soon, but hopeful for end of November.
MC ARIA rec on paper could hit fDecember 7. That is four aria specs.
JB: on WCAG 2.1 messaging?
MC: We will not know untle later
in the week. This will be our lasst update and communication
around what we did.
... Hoping for that communications with details, but could just
publish and say this is what we have.
<Judy> [jb: hearing possibly -- last draft before cr, take a look, stabilizing, nc to sc, numbering funkified; or could be actually, re-grouping, to be continued]
lot that is going to hit. We need to figure out who is going to do what.JB: Aria rec there is a
TS: First working draft by the
end of november, but less likely, buw within a month.
... TS or Ivan taking care of publishing communications.
MC: Aria ones related to publishong we should be coordinated.
<joanie> JD: I am going to prioritize the Graphics ARIA and Graphics AAM specs to unblock SVG AAM, which is no longer a joint deliverable with ARIA.
MC: The graphics documents we do not need to wory about the messaging.
<joanie> JD: I am also prioritizing AccName.
MC: we will need messaging for xxx, more interesting than the graphics.
JD: Also at TPAC, a first of core AAM 1.2 and it would not need to wait for AAM 1.1 to be out the door.
MC: We will not stop you from that.
JB: MC, JS, TS, all set? JD just
finished.
... any other business
... Wednesday December 6
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/TPAC/JB: TPAC/ Succeeded: s/There is a survey/JB: There is a survey/ Succeeded: s/???/guidelines working group/ Succeeded: s/unpresented/unprecedented/ FAILED: s/unpresented/unprecedented/ Succeeded: s/JS/JS:/ Succeeded: s/Doug VR person/Don Brutzman, Web 3D rep/ Succeeded: s/QTF/RQTF/ Succeeded: s/cross/cross-group topic this year/ Succeeded: s/there?/there? And in what venue?/ Succeeded: s/What is MGN?// Succeeded: s/MGM Don/MDM Don/ FAILED: s/MGM Don/MDN Dom/ Succeeded: s/JD: MC:/MC:/ Present: Joanmarie_Diggs MichaelC Judy George tzviya Regrets: Josh Kathy Found Scribe: George Inferring ScribeNick: George Found Scribe: Judy Inferring ScribeNick: Judy Found Scribe: George Inferring ScribeNick: George Scribes: George, Judy ScribeNicks: George, Judy WARNING: No date found! Assuming today. (Hint: Specify the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.) Or specify the date like this: <dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002 People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]