challenges with process

Lisa: we take up and item and it runs into problems
... issues come up again and again
... an issue comes up that people seemed to be good with before
... but it comes up again
... we need to be able to say that something is discussed and agreed on

Kim: on matf calls
... we also had a discussion document to document issues
... proved useful to keep people focused on the key issues rather than scattered discussion

<allanj> +1 to no new locations

Kathy: github does this as well, we shouldn't have another place to work

Lisa: Suggesting as part of the github issue a way to indicate the current issues

e.g. https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/78

<Hp> i wuld also like to look at the suplement proposal:https://docs.google.com/document/d/19CvGpbNn1MecK9iRO7MOhafCaVjIajyV2BjNz2OZZZY/edit#

<Hp> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19CvGpbNn1MecK9iRO7MOhafCaVjIajyV2BjNz2OZZZY/edit#

We want to have a way to get to everything in one place

on the GH issue we will add a section under the links to add links to relevant surveys

https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_SC_status

and a link to the section on the status page where we aggregate the current issues?

<allanj> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_SC_status#Issue_78_-_Adapting_Text

<allanj> github and email list discussions are just discussions. SC manager, facilitators extract Issues for status page - discussed in AG meeting, resolutions added to Status wiki

trackbot, end meeting