See also: IRC log
<LisaSeeman> table of content
<LisaSeeman> advice for content creaters
<LisaSeeman> advice for reserchers
<LisaSeeman> advice for poilicy maletr
<LisaSeeman> advice at's
<AWK> We need to identify if there is a distinction between what goes into a note and whether it gets adopted into public policy.
<interaccess> +1 to AWK
<AWK> If we think that the supplement doc will be adopted into policy we will get pushback from the WG on the nitty gritty details
<AWK> Unfortunately, I need to go.
<interaccess> I gotta drop..
Three questions we need to sort out:
Is the supplemental guidance a general one, or separate for each TF?
Can there be suggestions to policy-makers for how they can integrate aspects of the document into policy?
Could there be a normative portion of the document even though it´s a Note?
We need follow-up discussion to address those questions, think through them before, and make sure enough time to consider them
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found embedded ScribeOptions: -final *** RESTARTING DUE TO EMBEDDED OPTIONS *** Present: Kathy AWK Joshue MichaelC Judy Lisa Janina No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: MichaelC Inferring Scribes: MichaelC WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. Found Date: 03 May 2017 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2017/05/03-ag-facilitators-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]