See also: IRC log
<scribe> Scribe: Ian
<adamR> permagrets+ adamR
<zkoch> You can hear Ade's enthusiasm to be back in his voice
zkoch: Don't need anything from
group yet
... just getting fixes for now
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/milestone/8
IJ: Any topics where you would like Pos?
zkoch: some are editorial; that
would be helpful
... would love help
IJ: Any new sense of time?
zkoch: Our estimate still feels right: 3-4 weeks from today
<adrianba> or slower....
<zkoch> :D
https://domenic.github.io/payment-method-manifest/
zkoch: This is the same thing we
discussed at the FTF meeting.
... this is the spec form of the explainer we discussed
... how to get from identifying URL to a manifest if it
exists
... verify third party native apps
... this is the formal spec version
... would love comments on it
nicktr: Are there dependencies
that we need to explore.
... I think that there are not
... eg. I think PR API can move forward
zkoch: +1
<zkoch> Yes
IJ: My recollection is no
normative dependency from PMI on Payment Method Manifest but
informative pointer
... Thanks to Domenic
... we are planning to move to W3C repo (soon)
nick: Got an issues list for PMIs?
zkoch: AdrianB, Molly, Roy, and I reviewed PMI and BC and created cr milestones
<nicktr> https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-method-identifiers/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3ACR
IJ: Alan, are you satisfied with how manifest manages countries?
Alan: Yes
IJ: could we show an example of that in the spec?
zkoch: I think that you can pass
in multiple applications through the array
... another way to do this is in the web app manifest
spec.
... we can look into it
IJ: Anything special to go over here or business as usual?
zkoch: David Baron raised a
number of issues. I think they are mostly editorial (for PMI
and BC)
... there's a thread from David that IJ chimed in on but I
think there is nothing filed that is blocking and substantive
right now
Issue 29 => https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-methods-card/issues/29
[IJ summarizes]
Matt: Ok to postpone; let's not close
<zkoch> I think it's added already
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-handler
<AdrianHH> I would like to address https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-handler/issues/142 or put in an issue marker (as this now replaces Matt's issue 127)
IJ: Planning CFC first week of May
<AdrianHH> Otherwise nothing further todo
[Brief comment on issue 142...AHB has a small structural suggestion]
adrianhb: I think we can combine
two dictionaries in one
... got strong feelings? Let me know
IJ: I will create a frozen version of the spec for the CfC
<AdrianHH> Frozen version should be published prior to CfC imo
Status of setting up task force call?
nicktr: Roy reached out to get that moving and I haven't managed to properly responding yet.
Roy: I think we are ready to spin
up
... I will start scheduling thread.
<zkoch> Yay
<zkoch> +1 to 4 May
NickTR: I suggest we plan to meet 27 April although it may be short
<adrianba> +1
<AdrianHH> +1
Next meeting - 27 April
AdrianHG: I should be able to chair
<AlanSamsungPay> Regrets for next Thu 4/27