Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Teleconference

<renato> https://www.w3.org/2017/02/13-poe-minutes.html

Proposal: approve last meeting minutes

Minutes approved

<renato> https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Deliverables

renato: we are collecting potential groups and individual to ask for review and feedback

<renato> https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Email_Template

renato: the email template has been sent around
... is there anyone having comments on the text?
... I'd allow people to add issues on github directly
... should we set a deadline for the feedback?

ivan: we need to give them as much as time we can
... the F2F is mid-may so I'd say end of April and then two weeks to set most urgent issues by github and emails

renato: April 30th then

<renato> https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Deliverables

renato: here there is the list of people

<renato> https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/charter#coordination

phila: W3C wide means several groups, I'll send the email to these groups

<phila> ACTION: phila to contact groups listed at https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/charter#coordination [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/02/27-poe-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-42 - Contact groups listed at https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/charter#coordination [on Phil Archer - due 2017-03-06].

phila: the attention we need from internationalization is clear

<simonstey> a lot

ivan: do we have any property whose value is text?

<simonstey> all descriptions

ivan: then internationalization comes in

<simonstey> e.g. http://w3c.github.io/poe/vocab/#term-Assertion

renato: ODRL I'll take care of sending it, IPTC is up to Michael

ivan: for BSIG send an email to Bill

renato: the other contact persons are in the list. EDRLab - Michael. Is there any reasonable contact with CC?

<renato> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/PandOE/results

renato: AC Review members
... what's the best way to handle this?

<CarolineB> I should be able to dig out someone from CC but at the policy rather than technical end. If htat's any help?

phila: anyone who showed an interest should be contacted

renato: any other group to be contacted?
... the second part is the actual horizontal review

<simonstey> https://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/

phila: accessibility, I don't think there are issues here

ivan: in my experience it may happen that people in the accessibility group may comment on the accessibility of the documents

<renato> https://www.w3.org/International/techniques/developing-specs?collapse

renato: internationalization, there is a questionnaire
... do we simply fill in the questionnaire and then we send it to them, is that the process?

ivan: fill in the questionnaire and then contact them to tell that we did it

<renato> https://w3ctag.github.io/security-questionnaire/

renato: security, another questionnaire
... it seems there is not much for us
... is there any security guy here?

<benws_> Sorry guys - got to fly

<simonstey> +q

renato: there is privacy section and a security one

simonstey: the answers is what we put in the related section in our document

phila: we're not covering access control so these questions do not apply for us

renato: how do we proceed ?

<renato> http://gregnorc.github.io/ping-privacy-questions/

renato: I'll contact them
... privacy, we need to look at this in more details

<renato> https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-core/#privacy

renato: the privacy questionnaire has to be answered and then look at them as a group and if we are satisfied with them we can send them.
... and that's it for the horizontal reviews

<phila> agenda: https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20170227

renato: questions or comments on the review process?
... we can move to other business

<renato> https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/track/actions/open

renato: there are a number of open actions
... please close the actions when you're done with it

<phila> Raised issues

phila: there are two raised issues at this stage and it's remarkable
... they're quite old

renato: we started raising issues on GitHub
... I have to have a look, I think that issue #11 is fine
... but issue #10 I'm not sure

<simonstey> issue-10

<trackbot> issue-10 -- What does it mean for permissions/prohibitions/duties if their constraint(s) are (un)satisfied? -- raised

<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/track/issues/10

renato: we can move these two issues on Github to track them

F2F meeting in London

renato: do we have any logistics? Ben will provide more details soon.
... if you plan to come please add your name?
... we will look at the feedback we get and we will review the documents accordingly
... any other business for today's call?
... five days of meetings for some people
... rights management conference