See also: IRC log
SL: It needs an introductory
paragraph.
... Each of the process options follows a structure of design
methods with different project phases.
<Lauriat> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Process_for_designing_the_Process
Each phase has Objectives and Methods. The Methods are a variety of actions that will eventually be grouped into the thematically-organized option choices for the WCAG WG. Under the Methods section, there are sub-phases. Each option presented to the WCAG WG will have at least one Method for each phase and sub-phase.
Here are the Phases and the overview of it. We need to call that out and explain that.
Each of the options has the same structure and goes through the same Phases. Discovery (research), Interpretation (Analysis), Ideation (creating ideas), Experimentation (producing and testing prototypes), and Production (starting Silver). For more detail on the Phases see this wiki page: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Process_for_designing_the_Process
Each of the options has the same structure and goes through the same Phases: Discovery (research), Interpretation (Analysis), Ideation (creating ideas), Experimentation (producing and testing prototypes), and Production (starting Silver). For more detail on the Phases see this wiki page: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Process_for_designing_the_Process
Each of the options has the same structure and goes through the same Phases: Discovery (research), Interpretation (Analysis), Ideation (creating ideas), Experimentation (producing and testing prototypes), and Production (starting Silver). The difference between the options is the way the different methods are implemented. For more detail on the Phases and Methods see this wiki page:
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Process_for_designing_the_Process
<Lauriat> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Process_for_designing_the_Process#Project_Phases
[shawn wrote a new Introductory paragraph explaining the Phases. ]
Jeanne will move the Process for Designing the Process to the main wiki page with the options.
JS: I spotted some QA errors last night between the Google sheet and the comparison table. The Google sheet is here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1C4Wqf-g-0X_HqbJ-4euFS_U0xEISnURnilV6TJk7FQs/edit?usp=sharing
Jeanne is rearranging the Home page https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/index.php?title=Designing_Silver
<Lauriat> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Greatest_Flexibility_Option#Phase_5:_Production_and_Evolution
JS: I have sent the email to the WCAG WG https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2016JulSep/0667.html
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144 of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: jeanne Inferring Scribes: jeanne WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. Present: Shawn Jeanne WARNING: Fewer than 3 people found for Present list! Regrets: Sarah WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Got date from IRC log name: 13 Sep 2016 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/09/13-silver-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]