See also: IRC log
[doodle pending, specifics on who might be able to attend. ideas for OCF demo]
Junichi: do we have an update on the recharter?
Ted: pending. thank you for your comments earlier. I will try to further this with Kaz and before bringing to W3M will give the group a chance for a final review
Peter: are there any questions or comments on the progressing service spec?
Kevin: some progress and believe we should be able to get it toward a working draft that can be published by middle of September
Adam: modest refactoring based on F2F, checking consistency mostly
Peter: any update on the security model?
Junichi: since the guidelines will be a separate deliverable should we have bindings in the service spec?
Peter: the token mechanism needs to be part of the spec
Junichi: true but the other aspects of the guidelines are more about the surrounding architecture
Kevin: for the FPWD we would probably include a large portion of it included and see what sort of feedback we get, whether it should be abstracted out into a separate document
Junichi: in this architecture we don't need to take client (JS API) into consideration
Powell: JS API will be based on what is in the service spec
[discussion on Ted porting from wiki to respec in github]
<junichi-hashimoto> https://www.w3.org/2016/08/03-auto-minutes.html
<junichi-hashimoto> https://cabforum.org/wp-content/uploads/Guidance-Deprecated-Internal-Names.pdf
<junichi-hashimoto> Effective 1 October 2016, CAs SHALL revoke all unexpired Certificates whose SAN or Subject Common Name field contains a Reserved IP Address or Internal Server Name.
Junichi: in the second page of
the pdf are some important descriptions
... I am still stuck on wwwivi hostname issue