<QingAn> VSS

qa: : which direction should be taken?

pc: api accesses the data
... launching guidance is different
... there are a lot of methods
... including get/set methods

qa: what is the relationship between vehicle data and vss

ka: should be done by the data comparison tf
... we need to think about use cases of LBS/Navigation
... also some architecture model
... and in parallel we need to see the data format

pc: have started some work on use cases
... comparison between W3C use cases and Genivi use cases
... W3C data spec includes JS properties
... while Genivi LBS doesn't handle properties
... just use methods to access data
... so would like to understand the difference

kaz: W3C Vehicle Data doesn't handle concrete location data except lane departure
... so we should see the data definition/structure of Genivi LBS

pc: ok
... would like to show it
... showing part of the LBS api definition
... a lot of set/get methods
... there is a "position" parameter
... hierarchy of the data

ka: any figure about the hierarchy?

pc: no figure at the moment
... but can generate it
... let's see "guidance"

ka: is this document public?

pc: this one itself is member-only
... there is a public repo as well

ka: ok
... please send the address later
... btw, we should think about the basic policy/strategy for this TF

pc: can generate a figure on the data hierarchy
... also take some examples
... to explain the guidance api

ka: great

pc: you know better how to deal with the data format for the W3C side, Kaz

ka: regarding the strategy, we should involve more Tier1 companies

-> https://www.w3.org/community/autowebplatform/participants BG participants

pc: I'm leading the work on the Genivi side

ka: ok

pc: but for the W3C side we need more participants

ka: right

pc: will be in Japan in July for an AGL meeting
... and can talk with JP stakeholders

ka: great
... getting more participants in this BG is the key
... probably better to have Genivi guys as the BG participants too

pc: not sure Genivi guys have enough time

ka: ok
... getting more BG participants in this TF is important
... and Genivi guys are also welcome :)

pc: yes

ka: let's continue to get more participants
... and also let's start detailed survey on the Genivi LBS spec
... you can provide some examples with the hierarchy figure

[ adjourned ]