ISSUE-75: quality metadata out of scope?
quality metadata out of scope?
quality metadata out of scope?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Use Cases and Requirements
- Raised by:
- Frans Knibbe
- Opened on:
- 2016-08-25
- Description:
- "Quality metadata" is a requirement for the Coverage deliverable. It currently reads "It should be possible to describe properties of the data quality, e.g. uncertainty."
The need to describe data quality is a general data issue, so it does not seem in scope for the Coverage deliverable and it does not need to be mentioned in the UCR document.
Should we decide to keep the requirement, perhaps it could just as well be related to the other deliverables.
Is there something about coverage data that justify making this requirement explicit for the coverage deliverable?
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: UCR ISSUE-75: Coverage requirement for quality metadata in scope? (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-09-26)
- [Minutes F2F] 2016-09-19 (from phila@w3.org on 2016-09-20)
- Re: UCR ISSUE-75: Coverage requirement for quality metadata in scope? (from j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk on 2016-09-14)
- Re: UCR ISSUE-75: Coverage requirement for quality metadata in scope? (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-09-14)
- Re: UCR ISSUE-75: Coverage requirement for quality metadata in scope? (from j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk on 2016-09-13)
- UCR ISSUE-75: Coverage requirement for quality metadata in scope? (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-09-09)
- Re: Review UCR w.r.t. SSN (from jeremy.tandy@gmail.com on 2016-08-30)
- Re: Review UCR w.r.t. SSN (from rob@metalinkage.com.au on 2016-08-25)
- Re: Review UCR w.r.t. SSN (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-08-25)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log
