ISSUE-36: What constitutes appropriate evidence for a BP

BP evidence

What constitutes appropriate evidence for a BP

State:

OPEN

Product:

best practices

Raised by:

Jeremy Tandy

Opened on:

2016-01-12

Description:

In point (13) of his email to the WG [1], Frans states:

> I appreciate seeing references to BP requirements from the UCR document. But they are placed in the 'Evidence' section of the BP template now. Is it appropriate to count requirements derived from use cases as evidence of a best practice? I would expect references to use cases and requirements to occur in the 'Why' section of the template. Or in a template section that is especially reserved for requirements, e.g 'Relevant requirements'.

We're following the pro-forma set out by DWBP (for example, see http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#identifiersWithinDatasets). I'll admit to not thinking too hard about this so far; we likely need to come back to this.

@phila - can you make a suggestion for (post-FPWD) change?

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. RE: My BP comments (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2016-01-13)
2. RE: My BP comments (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2016-01-13)
3. RE: My BP comments (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2016-01-13)
4. RE: My BP comments (from l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl on 2016-01-13)
5. Re: My BP comments (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-01-13)
6. RE: My BP comments (from andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu on 2016-01-12)
7. RE: My BP comments (from chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk on 2016-01-12)
8. Re: My BP comments (from andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu on 2016-01-12)
9. Re: My BP comments (from bill@swirrl.com on 2016-01-12)
10. Re: My BP comments (from ssimmons@opengeospatial.org on 2016-01-12)
11. Re: My BP comments (from janowicz@ucsb.edu on 2016-01-12)
12. Re: My BP comments (from jeremy.tandy@gmail.com on 2016-01-12)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log