ISSUE-23: phrasing of the spatial operators requirement
phrasing of the spatial operators requirement
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Use Cases and Requirements
- Raised by:
- Frans Knibbe
- Opened on:
- 2015-06-10
- Description:
- The phrasing of the spatial operators requirement (http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#SpatialOperators) seems unclear. Current wording:
There should be a recommended way for the definition and use of spatial operators. Spatial things can have spatial relations: topological relations, directional or distance relations. Operators based on these relations (e.g. 'Contains'. 'Intersects', 'Nearest') should be well defined and easy to use.
Questions:
1) Will we specify that we understand operators to work on numerical data?
2) Is the difference between operators and relationships clear (compare GeoSPARQL fucntions and relationships)? For spatial relationships there is a separate requirement (http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#SpatialRelationships).
Related e-mail threads:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2015May/0141.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2015Jun/0044.html
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from bill@swirrl.com on 2016-08-16)
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-08-16)
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from bill@swirrl.com on 2016-08-15)
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-08-15)
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-07-25)
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from matthew.perry@oracle.com on 2016-07-14)
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-07-14)
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk on 2016-07-14)
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-07-14)
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from matthew.perry@oracle.com on 2016-07-13)
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk on 2016-07-13)
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-07-13)
- RE: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl on 2016-07-12)
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-07-11)
- RE: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2016-07-08)
- RE: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk on 2016-07-07)
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-07-07)
- RE: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk on 2016-07-07)
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from bill@swirrl.com on 2016-07-06)
- Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-07-06)
- [Minutes] 2015-11-11 (from phila@w3.org on 2015-11-11)
- Re: UCR ISSUE-23: phrasing of the spatial operators requirement (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2015-10-08)
- RE: UCR ISSUE-23: phrasing of the spatial operators requirement (from l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl on 2015-10-08)
- UCR ISSUE-23: phrasing of the spatial operators requirement (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2015-10-07)
- Re: Frozen copy? (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2015-06-10)
Related notes:
[frans]: BP
11 Nov 2015, 20:16:25BP editors decided no change is required.
Frans Knibbe, 13 Jul 2016, 13:40:32Display change log