ISSUE-23: phrasing of the spatial operators requirement

phrasing of the spatial operators requirement

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Use Cases and Requirements
Raised by:
Frans Knibbe
Opened on:
2015-06-10
Description:
The phrasing of the spatial operators requirement (http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#SpatialOperators) seems unclear. Current wording:

There should be a recommended way for the definition and use of spatial operators. Spatial things can have spatial relations: topological relations, directional or distance relations. Operators based on these relations (e.g. 'Contains'. 'Intersects', 'Nearest') should be well defined and easy to use.

Questions:
1) Will we specify that we understand operators to work on numerical data?
2) Is the difference between operators and relationships clear (compare GeoSPARQL fucntions and relationships)? For spatial relationships there is a separate requirement (http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#SpatialRelationships).

Related e-mail threads:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2015May/0141.html

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2015Jun/0044.html

Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from bill@swirrl.com on 2016-08-16)
  2. Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-08-16)
  3. Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from bill@swirrl.com on 2016-08-15)
  4. Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-08-15)
  5. Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-07-25)
  6. Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from matthew.perry@oracle.com on 2016-07-14)
  7. Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-07-14)
  8. Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk on 2016-07-14)
  9. Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-07-14)
  10. Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from matthew.perry@oracle.com on 2016-07-13)
  11. Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk on 2016-07-13)
  12. Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-07-13)
  13. RE: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl on 2016-07-12)
  14. Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-07-11)
  15. RE: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2016-07-08)
  16. RE: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk on 2016-07-07)
  17. Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-07-07)
  18. RE: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk on 2016-07-07)
  19. Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from bill@swirrl.com on 2016-07-06)
  20. Re: Wanted: feedback on UCR requirements (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2016-07-06)
  21. [Minutes] 2015-11-11 (from phila@w3.org on 2015-11-11)
  22. Re: UCR ISSUE-23: phrasing of the spatial operators requirement (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2015-10-08)
  23. RE: UCR ISSUE-23: phrasing of the spatial operators requirement (from l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl on 2015-10-08)
  24. UCR ISSUE-23: phrasing of the spatial operators requirement (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2015-10-07)
  25. Re: Frozen copy? (from frans.knibbe@geodan.nl on 2015-06-10)

Related notes:

[frans]: BP

11 Nov 2015, 20:16:25

BP editors decided no change is required.

Frans Knibbe, 13 Jul 2016, 13:40:32

Display change log ATOM feed


Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>, Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, Chairs, Fran├žois Daoust <fd@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.325 2014-09-10 21:42:02 ted Exp $