ISSUE-168: Section 7 "DateTime Description" 1st paragraph:
Section 7 "DateTime Description" 1st paragraph:
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Time ontology in OWL
- Raised by:
- Simon Cox
- Opened on:
- 2017-04-12
- Description:
- From https://www.w3.org/XML/2007/qts-timeont-comments#id64153
A datetime description has the following properties/fields: unitType, year, month, week, day, dayOfWeek, dayOfYear, hour, minute, second, and timeZone.
Since the "week" (week number) is culture specific it seems a bad choice to include it in the "canonical" description without additional properties/fields to disambiguate this. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- OWL-Time - ISSUE-168: Section 7 "DateTime Description" 1st paragraph: (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2017-04-12)
Related notes:
Proposed disposition - from email 2017-04-12
Yes - weeks, months, days etc, and week-numer are all culture specific.
One of the key enhancements in this revision of OWL-Time is the time:hasTRS property, to support the explicit indication of the temporal reference system (including calendar). This allows values to be scoped so they can be correctly interpreted. Gregorian Calendar / ISO 8601 is the default for :DateTimeDescription and :DateTimeDuration, but in all other cases the TRS should be indicated.
Display change log
