ISSUE-134: Do we need to define all the entailment rules in the spec as per QB

Entailment rules

Do we need to define all the entailment rules in the spec as per QB

State:
POSTPONED
Product:
QB4ST
Raised by:
Phil Archer
Opened on:
2017-01-03
Description:
and if so using what formalism - basically entail missing properties from broader definitions?
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
No related emails

Related notes:

leave for formal spec if deemed necessary

Rob Atkinson, 21 Feb 2017, 03:08:50

Display change log ATOM feed


Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>, Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, Chairs, Fran├žois Daoust <fd@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.325 2014-09-10 21:42:02 ted Exp $