ISSUE-105: ssn:hasProperty and ssn:produces lost

frustration with specgen

ssn:hasProperty and ssn:produces lost

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Semantic Sensor Network Ontology
Raised by:
Kerry Taylor
Opened on:
2016-12-09
Description:
Specgen has entirely lost ssn:hasProperty and ssn:produces in the ssn spec.
It might have lost other things too. This needs to be checked closely.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: [Minutes SSN] 2017 03 15 (from phila@w3.org on 2017-03-20)
  2. RE: [Minutes SSN] 2017 03 15 (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2017-03-20)
  3. RE: [Minutes SSN] 2017 03 15 (from kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au on 2017-03-20)
  4. [Minutes SSN] 2017 03 15 (from phila@w3.org on 2017-03-15)
  5. Re: [public-sdw-wg] <none> (from jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com on 2017-03-14)
  6. Re: [public-sdw-wg] <none> (from jeremy.tandy@gmail.com on 2017-03-14)
  7. RE: [public-sdw-wg] <none> (from chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk on 2017-03-14)
  8. [public-sdw-wg] <none> (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2017-03-14)
  9. Re: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 14-03-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC (from ssimmons@opengeospatial.org on 2017-03-13)
  10. Agenda SSN meeting this week - 14-03-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC (from armin.haller@anu.edu.au on 2017-03-13)
  11. RE: ssn ready for review (from kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au on 2016-12-15)
  12. Re: ssn ready for review (from rgarcia@fi.upm.es on 2016-12-14)
  13. Re: ssn ready for review (from janowicz@ucsb.edu on 2016-12-13)
  14. RE: ssn ready for review (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2016-12-13)
  15. Re: ssn ready for review (from janowicz@ucsb.edu on 2016-12-13)
  16. Re: ssn ready for review (from rgarcia@fi.upm.es on 2016-12-13)
  17. RE: ssn ready for review (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2016-12-13)
  18. Re: ssn ready for review (from danh.lephuoc@tu-berlin.de on 2016-12-13)
  19. Pull-request - some comments on SSN RE: ssn ready for review (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2016-12-13)
  20. RE: ssn ready for review (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2016-12-13)
  21. RE: ssn ready for review (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2016-12-13)
  22. RE: ssn ready for review (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2016-12-13)
  23. Re: ssn ready for review (from janowicz@ucsb.edu on 2016-12-12)
  24. Re: ssn ready for review (from janowicz@ucsb.edu on 2016-12-12)
  25. ssn ready for review (from kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au on 2016-12-12)

Related notes:

turns out it was not specgen's fault -- it has more to do with the provenance of the version of ssn that was used to generate the FPWD. I have updated issue 105 for the second PWD as follows
"Object properties ssn:isValueOf, ssn:produces and ssn:featureinObservation, along with a propertychain subproperty of produces and another propertychain subproperty of hasProperty, were introduced unintentionally in the FPWD. These have been removed here but could be reinstated if there is demand. "

Kerry Taylor, 12 Dec 2016, 12:59:47

Display change log ATOM feed


Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>, Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, Chairs, Fran├žois Daoust <fd@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.325 2014-09-10 21:42:02 ted Exp $