Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.

Comments/September2016/

From RDF Data Shapes Working Group
Jump to: navigation, search

September 2016

Title Commenter Mail start Edits made Issue Resolved
Labels for literals in sh:enumeration Miika Alonen [1] ISSUE-179
"Defined" undefined Peter Patel-Schneider [2] [3] ISSUE-197
"Undefined" is used inconsistently Peter Patel-Schneider [4] ISSUE-183 Yes (closed)
"Declared" and "defined" are undefined Peter Patel-Schneider [5] ISSUE-197
"Deep copy" is undefined Peter Patel-Schneider [6] Yes (0 in doc)
minCount definitions Peter Patel-Schneider [7] [8] Yes
Entailment Peter Patel-Schneider [9]
Filter shapes are not "evaluated" Peter Patel-Schneider [10] [11] [12] filters being removed
Failure in SHACL not adequately defined Peter Patel-Schneider [13]
Access to shapes graph/pre-binding Peter Patel-Schneider [14]
Recursion Peter Patel-Schneider [15] [16]
Property paths Peter Patel-Schneider [17] ISSUE-184 Yes (issue closed)
Different levels of SHACL implementation Peter Patel-Schneider [18] specific thread
Closing of ISSUE-107 Peter Patel-Schneider [19] [20]
Closing of ISSUE-106 Peter Patel-Schneider [21] [22]
Closing of ISSUE-163 Peter Patel-Schneider [23] [24]
Closing of ISSUE-155 Peter Patel-Schneider [25] [26]
Closing of ISSUE-142 Peter Patel-Schneider [27] [28]
Can literals be shapes? Peter Patel-Schneider [29]
Order of filters/evaluation order in SHACL v SPARQL Peter Patel-Schneider [30] ISSUE-185 filters being removed
Levels of conformance Peter Patel-Schneider [31] [32] [33]
$this in aggregations Peter Patel-Schneider [34] ISSUE-208
Example for sh:datatype Peter Patel-Schneider [35] [36]
on poor wording and loose terminology for prefix handling Peter Patel-Schneider [37]
What is a shape? Peter Patel-Schneider [38] [39] ISSUE-209
Expected type Peter Patel-Schneider [40] [41] [42] ISSUE-210
on failure and sh:hasShape Peter Patel-Schneider [43] [44] Need reply from Peter
on lists Peter Patel-Schneider [45] [46] Under discussion latest
parameter descriptions for constraint components Peter Patel-Schneider [47] [48] ISSUE-191 Done, awaiting discussion
Peter Patel-Schneider [mail] [edits]

November, 2016

Title Commenter Mail start Edits made Issue Resolved
Constraint component node unclear Peter Patel-Schneider [49] [edits] [50]
Graph is result of validation; report entities useful? Peter Patel-Schneider [51] [edits]
"Processing" not defined Peter Patel-Schneider [52] [edits]
How node target specifies targets? Peter Patel-Schneider [53] [edits]
Filters do not filter out focus nodes Peter Patel-Schneider [54] [edits] filters being removed
filterShape needs explicit type Peter Patel-Schneider [55] [edits] filters being removed
Targets as values always ignored Peter Patel-Schneider [56] [edits] ISSUE-192 (parts) filters being removed
Shape is not a focus node constraint Peter Patel-Schneider [57] [edits]
Pre-binding in SHACL core Peter Patel-Schneider [58] [edits] ISSUE-202
Eliminate property constraints Peter Patel-Schneider [59] [edits] ISSUE-211
Property constraints and focus node constraints Peter Patel-Schneider [60] [edits] ISSUE-212
Finding shapes Peter Patel-Schneider [61] [edits] ISSUE-213

Unresolved carried over from August

See Wiki page for more detail

Most are covered on this wiki page

Title Commenter Mail start Edits made Issue Resolved
Pre-binding Peter Patel-Schneider [62] [edits]
Syntax of SPARQL variables Peter Patel-Schneider [63] [64]
$this in aggregations Peter Patel-Schneider [65] ISSUE-208
ASK syntax Peter Patel-Schneider [66] [67]
Different levels of implementation Peter Patel-Schneider [68] [edits]  ?
Order of filters Peter Patel-Schneider [69] [edits] filters being removed
EXISTS and blank noes Peter Patel-Schneider [70] [edits]
Union operation on data graphs and shapes graphs Peter Patel-Schneider [71] [72]  ?
$targetNode assumed bound Peter Patel-Schneider [73] [edits]
Shapes graph determination Peter Patel-Schneider [74] [edits]  ?
Deep copy Peter Patel-Schneider [75] [edits] removed from document
Incomplete table Peter Patel-Schneider [76] [77]  ?

? means that it isn't clear if the edits resolved the issue.