ISSUE-72: Qualified Cardinality Restrictions

QCRs

Qualified Cardinality Restrictions

State:
CLOSED
Product:
SHACL Spec
Raised by:
Holger Knublauch
Opened on:
2015-06-25
Description:
1) Shall SHACL support something similar to QCRs?
2) If yes, is the approach outlined below OK?

http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl-ref/#sh-abstractqualifiedvalueshapepropertyconstraint-abstract-template

Example: https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/blob/ISSUE-62/data-shapes-test-suite/tests/features/core/qualifiedValueShape-001.ttl
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. ISSUE-72: sh:qualifiedValueShape added to spec (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-08-14)
  2. Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-53 and ISSUE-72 adopting sh:qualifiedValueShape (from eric@w3.org on 2015-07-28)
  3. Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-53 and ISSUE-72 adopting sh:qualifiedValueShape (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-07-28)
  4. Proposal to close ISSUE-53 and ISSUE-72 adopting sh:qualifiedValueShape (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-07-28)
  5. Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 23 July 2015 (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-07-23)
  6. shapes-ISSUE-72 (QCRs): Qualified Cardinality Restrictions [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-06-25)

Related notes:

Resolution: Close ISSUE-72, adopting sh:qualifiedValueShape as currently specified in editor's draft
See http://www.w3.org/2015/08/13-shapes-minutes.html#resolution02

Arnaud Le Hors, 13 Aug 2015, 21:06:52

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 72.html,v 1.1 2018/11/26 09:03:41 carine Exp $