ISSUE-105: SHACL SPARQL constraints depend on namespaces in a graph, which is not defined
defined prefixes
SHACL SPARQL constraints depend on namespaces in a graph, which is not defined
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SHACL Spec
- Raised by:
- Peter Patel-Schneider
- Opened on:
- 2015-10-29
- Description:
- From Section 6.2:
Before parsing, a SHACL processor must prepend PREFIX statements for all namespace prefixes defined in the current shapes graph.
Namespace prefixes are not defined in an RDF graph, so this cannot be done. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-105: Updated proposal with sh:prefixes (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-09-15)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Possible compromise (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-09-09)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Possible compromise (from andy.seaborne@topquadrant.com on 2016-09-08)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Possible compromise (from markh@metarelate.net on 2016-09-08)
- RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 8 September 2016 (from eric@w3.org on 2016-09-07)
- ISSUE-105: Possible compromise (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-09-02)
- Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-08-31)
- RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 25 August 2016 (from eric@w3.org on 2016-08-24)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-05-09)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-05-09)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-05-08)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from eric@w3.org on 2016-05-08)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-05-07)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-05-07)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-05-06)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-05-06)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from jamsden@us.ibm.com on 2016-05-06)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-05-06)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from miika.alonen@csc.fi on 2016-05-06)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-05-05)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from eric@w3.org on 2016-04-24)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-24)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-04-23)
- ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-23)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Proposal based on sh:prefix (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-04-22)
- Re: ISSUE-105: Proposal based on sh:prefix (from jamsden@us.ibm.com on 2016-04-22)
- ISSUE-105: Proposal based on sh:prefix (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-22)
- Some issues that may be close to resolution (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-06)
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 3 March 2016 (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-03)
- ISSUE-105: Updated proposals (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-02-19)
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016 (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-02-18)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-105 (defined prefixes): SHACL SPARQL constraints depend on namespaces in a graph, which is not defined [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-10-30)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-105 (defined prefixes): SHACL SPARQL constraints depend on namespaces in a graph, which is not defined [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-10-30)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-105 (defined prefixes): SHACL SPARQL constraints depend on namespaces in a graph, which is not defined [SHACL Spec] (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-10-29)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-105 (defined prefixes): SHACL SPARQL constraints depend on namespaces in a graph, which is not defined [SHACL Spec] (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-10-29)
- shapes-ISSUE-105 (defined prefixes): SHACL SPARQL constraints depend on namespaces in a graph, which is not defined [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-10-29)
Related notes:
RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-105 adopting the so called "decomposed prefixes in Turtle" proposal drafted by Holger in https://rawgit.com/w3c/data-shapes/bf5efb571196cf3c6b63137302c9c13a369e3466/shacl/index.html#sparql-prefixes
See http://www.w3.org/2016/09/21-shapes-minutes.html#resolution04
Display change log