See also: IRC log
<Lisa_Seeman> agenda: this
<Lisa_Seeman> scribe: Kinshuk
Lisa: Are people attending CCHP conference?
John: No
<Lisa_Seeman> http://www.icchp.org/
<Tony_Doran> Thanks
<Lisa_Seeman> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/track/actions/
Lisa: Kinshuk will complete
review of adaptive technologies and post to wiki this
week.
... We are going through open action items.
Debbie: Progress on Aphesia is continuing.
Sussanne: Progress on ADD group is continuing, but it will be few weeks before it can be posted.
John: Not part of Downs Syndrome group.
No further update on Aging and Dementia
John: Past week received new content on Autism, and will be adding to gap analysis very soon.
Lisa: In terms of technology review, Steve has done fantastic work on Fluid.
Joseph: Will update non-vocal update today.
Lisa: Action items on gpii and fluid will be marked as done.
Deborah: No useful content for tech simplication is found, but will continue to monitor.
<Tony_Doran> Sorry me back in call dropped
<Lisa_Seeman> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Main_Page
Lisa: Would like to review what technologies are missing taht should be covered.
<Lisa_Seeman> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Main_Page
<Lisa_Seeman> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/51wishlist
Lisa: We should look at HTML 5
wish list, and see if anything else should be added.
... Should we be looking at input type numeric?
Neil: Yes, we should.
Lisa: OK. Let's add that.
Debbie: Looking at emotional analysis is good idea, particularly with respect to autism.
<Lisa_Seeman> Emotion Markup - debra Dahl
Lisa: John could perhaps look at
Full Transcript?
... JohnF and not JohnR
John: Text-to-Speech should be addded as technology.
<Tony_Doran> TTS is a technology that should be added
Lisa: Tony, please also look at Dyslexia.
<Lisa_Seeman> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Gap_Analysis/Dyslexia
<ddahl> The EmotionML spec includes a use case for annotating text or media with emotions to assist people with autism in interpreting emotions (http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-emotionml-20140522/#s1.1)
<Tony_Doran> Ok - can start on that week starting 14th July
Lisa: Next haptic output - intersting and possibly useful. Should we add it to wish list?
<Tony_Doran> Great to finally get involved btw.
<NeilMilliken> Speech recognition should be on the list too
John: We should add haptics to our list.
<Lisa_Seeman> Haptic Output should be on our radar
Lisa: Gaming?
There is work going on Game Accessibility Guidelines
<NeilMilliken> http://gameaccessibilityguidelines.com/
Lisa: Gaming is important, and theer is also gamification.
<Lisa_Seeman> games and gamification
Lisa
Lisa: My connection dropped out.
I shall try to recoonect.
<Tony_Doran> Ok will email, but again sorry will be week starting 14th July. Lots of relevant stuff to cog in :)
<Tony_Doran> Yes yes yes. Standardising access keys is a great idea. So so many implementations out there with no standard to point to.
<Lisa_Seeman> http://accessibility.athena-ict.com/TechniquesCOGA.html
<Lisa_Seeman> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2014Jun/0038.html
<JohnRochford> Lisa: We should have a tag system the techniques page
<Lisa_Seeman> Use left-justified with ragged right edge.
<Lisa_Seeman> Plus tags: Language reading
<Lisa_Seeman> Negative localization tags: Hebrew Arabic Chinese
<JohnRochford> Lisa: Tag system should be by disability
<JohnRochford> Lisa: Tag system examples: plus tags for language reading; negative localization tags for Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese
<JohnRochford> Lisa: Correction - tag system should be by function, not disability
<JohnRochford> Lisa: One issue is that some techniques are good for some people but not for others
<JohnRochford> Lisa: Another issue is about language localization
<JohnRochford> Lisa: Default is that a technique would be good for everyone, including speakers of all languages
<NeilMilliken> I understand the underlying context - the issue is complex
<JohnRochford> Lisa: There would be a field for each technique for tags, e.g., "good for language or reading"
<JohnRochford> Lisa: We would also be groups that a technique is bad for
<JohnRochford> John: Correction - There would also be groups that a technique would be bad for
<JohnRochford> Lisa: There would be separate lines or fields in which the tags would be added
<JohnRochford> Lisa: Another term for "tags" is "key words"
<Lisa_Seeman> Use left-justified with ragged right edge.
<Lisa_Seeman> Plus tags: Language reading
<Lisa_Seeman> Negative localization tags: Hebrew Arabic Chinese
<Lisa_Seeman> use for (keyword): Language reading
<Tony_Doran> Super
<Tony_Doran> Speak to you all in 3 weeks
<Lisa_Seeman> ACTION: debra Dahl to review emotion Markup - [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/06/23-coga-minutes.html#action01]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: Kinshuk Inferring ScribeNick: Kinshuk WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Barry_Johnson Conno Debbie Debbie_Dahl Deborah John JohnRochford Joseph Joseph_O Kinshuk Lisa Lisa_Seeman MichaelC Neil NeilMilliken P0 P5 P6 Susann_Keohane Sussanne Tim Tim_Boland Tony_Doran aaaa aabb aacc aadd ddahl https inserted trackbot You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy Regrets: Jim_Allen E.A._Draffan Debra_Ruh Kinshuk WARNING: No meeting title found! You should specify the meeting title like this: <dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting Got date from IRC log name: 23 Jun 2014 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2014/06/23-coga-minutes.html People with action items: dahl debra WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]