13:58:55 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/09/28-sparql-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/09/28-sparql-irc ←
13:58:57 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←
13:58:59 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 77277
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 77277 ←
13:58:59 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes ←
13:59:00 <LeeF> zakim, this will be SPARQL
Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, this will be SPARQL ←
13:59:00 <trackbot> Meeting: SPARQL Working Group Teleconference
13:59:01 <trackbot> Date: 28 September 2010
13:59:02 <Zakim> ok, LeeF, I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM already started
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, LeeF, I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM already started ←
13:59:07 <Zakim> +MattPerry
Zakim IRC Bot: +MattPerry ←
13:59:40 <Zakim> +LeeF
Zakim IRC Bot: +LeeF ←
13:59:40 <Zakim> + +1.310.729.aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.310.729.aaaa ←
13:59:40 <bglimm> All circuits are busy now for me too :-(
Birte Glimm: All circuits are busy now for me too :-( ←
13:59:49 <SteveH_> yup :(
Steve Harris: yup :( ←
13:59:53 <kasei> Zakim, aaaa is me
Gregory Williams: Zakim, aaaa is me ←
13:59:53 <Zakim> +kasei; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +kasei; got it ←
14:00:16 <LeeF> I haven't seen any W3C notices, which doesn't really mean much.
Lee Feigenbaum: I haven't seen any W3C notices, which doesn't really mean much. ←
14:00:26 <Zakim> +pgearon
Zakim IRC Bot: +pgearon ←
14:00:34 <Zakim> +??P26
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P26 ←
14:00:35 <LeeF> Regrets: Axel, Chime, Alex
14:00:41 <AndyS> zakim, ??P26 is me
Andy Seaborne: zakim, ??P26 is me ←
14:00:41 <Zakim> +AndyS; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +AndyS; got it ←
14:01:03 <Zakim> +Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: +Sandro ←
14:01:13 <LeeF> Scribenick: MattPerry
(Scribe set to Matthew Perry)
14:01:21 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:01:28 <SteveH_> Zakim, [IPcaller] is me
Steve Harris: Zakim, [IPcaller] is me ←
14:01:28 <Zakim> +SteveH_; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +SteveH_; got it ←
14:01:30 <Zakim> +bglimm
Zakim IRC Bot: +bglimm ←
14:01:45 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, mute me ←
14:01:53 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should now be muted ←
14:01:56 <Zakim> +??P30
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P30 ←
14:02:18 <Zakim> +Souri
Zakim IRC Bot: +Souri ←
14:02:33 <NickH> Zakim, ??P30 is me
Nicholas Humfrey: Zakim, ??P30 is me ←
14:02:33 <Zakim> +NickH; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +NickH; got it ←
14:04:05 <Zakim> +Garlik
Zakim IRC Bot: +Garlik ←
14:04:10 <Zakim> -SteveH_
Zakim IRC Bot: -SteveH_ ←
14:04:14 <MattPerry> LeeF: want to go through documents to see status for next round of publication
Lee Feigenbaum: want to go through documents to see status for next round of publication ←
14:04:18 <SteveH> Zakim, Garlik is temporarily me
Steve Harris: Zakim, Garlik is temporarily me ←
14:04:18 <Zakim> +SteveH; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +SteveH; got it ←
14:04:29 <OlivierCorby> Not able to join by tel, system refuses ...
Olivier Corby: Not able to join by tel, system refuses ... ←
14:04:46 <MattPerry> LeeF: not in a position to go over Let/Bind this week but maybe next week
Lee Feigenbaum: not in a position to go over Let/Bind this week but maybe next week ←
14:04:47 <LeeF> Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-09-28
14:04:55 <LeeF> PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-09-14
PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-09-14 ←
14:05:12 <Zakim> +OlivierCorby
Zakim IRC Bot: +OlivierCorby ←
14:05:19 <OlivierCorby> Hi
Olivier Corby: Hi ←
14:05:37 <LeeF> RESOLVED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-09-14
RESOLVED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-09-14 ←
14:05:57 <MattPerry> topic: query document reviews
14:06:37 <MattPerry> LeeF: issues: BINDING keyword and isNumeric function and errors in aggregates
Lee Feigenbaum: issues: BINDING keyword and isNumeric function and errors in aggregates ←
14:06:48 <LeeF> subtopic: semantics of BINDINGS
14:06:58 <LeeF> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0370.html
Lee Feigenbaum: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0370.html ←
14:07:35 <LeeF> """
Lee Feigenbaum: """ ←
14:07:36 <LeeF> for each row:
Lee Feigenbaum: for each row: ←
14:07:36 <LeeF> substitute all occurrences of named variables in the query
Lee Feigenbaum: substitute all occurrences of named variables in the query ←
14:07:36 <LeeF> execute modified query
Lee Feigenbaum: execute modified query ←
14:07:37 <LeeF> """
Lee Feigenbaum: """ ←
14:08:42 <LeeF> """
Lee Feigenbaum: """ ←
14:08:43 <LeeF> SELECT *
Lee Feigenbaum: SELECT * ←
14:08:43 <LeeF> { ?s ?p ?o . FILTER ( ?o < ?v ) }
Lee Feigenbaum: { ?s ?p ?o . FILTER ( ?o < ?v ) } ←
14:08:43 <LeeF> BINDINGS ?v { (1) (2) }
Lee Feigenbaum: BINDINGS ?v { (1) (2) } ←
14:08:44 <LeeF> """
Lee Feigenbaum: """ ←
14:09:26 <LeeF> this bindings list has two rows, each with one value
Lee Feigenbaum: this bindings list has two rows, each with one value ←
14:09:29 <MattPerry> AndyS: for each binding set, substitute into query and then execute query
Andy Seaborne: for each binding set, substitute into query and then execute query ←
14:10:09 <MattPerry> AndyS: in federated doc, turn binding into table and then join with query
Andy Seaborne: in federated doc, turn binding into table and then join with query ←
14:10:33 <SteveH> q+
Steve Harris: q+ ←
14:10:36 <kasei> is this a better example for this discussion (whether the results have any variables bound)?: select * where {} bindings ?s { (1) (2) }
Gregory Williams: is this a better example for this discussion (whether the results have any variables bound)?: select * where {} bindings ?s { (1) (2) } ←
14:10:47 <LeeF> ack SteveH
Lee Feigenbaum: ack SteveH ←
14:11:18 <MattPerry> SteveH: our implementation works more like the join description
Steve Harris: our implementation works more like the join description ←
14:12:09 <LeeF> Not so sure if that's a good example, Greg - wouldn't that turn the same way either way?
Lee Feigenbaum: Not so sure if that's a good example, Greg - wouldn't that turn the same way either way? ←
14:12:13 <MattPerry> SteveH: for Greg's example we would get ?s bound to 1 and 2
Steve Harris: for Greg's example we would get ?s bound to 1 and 2 ←
14:12:23 <AndyS> kasei, independent design point - can make ?v visible of * or not for either design
Andy Seaborne: kasei, independent design point - can make ?v visible of * or not for either design ←
14:13:01 <OlivierCorby> What about variables in minus ?
Olivier Corby: What about variables in minus ? ←
14:13:30 <kasei> I share SteveH's concern about optimization.
Gregory Williams: I share SteveH's concern about optimization. ←
14:14:31 <ericP> Zakim, please dial ericP-office
Eric Prud'hommeaux: Zakim, please dial ericP-office ←
14:14:31 <Zakim> ok, ericP; the call is being made
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, ericP; the call is being made ←
14:14:32 <Zakim> +EricP
Zakim IRC Bot: +EricP ←
14:15:06 <MattPerry> AndyS: this definition is an improvement in federated query
Andy Seaborne: this definition is an improvement in federated query ←
14:15:09 <OlivierCorby> q+
Olivier Corby: q+ ←
14:15:21 <LeeF> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0370.html
Lee Feigenbaum: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0370.html ←
14:16:44 <LeeF> ack OlivierCorby
Lee Feigenbaum: ack OlivierCorby ←
14:16:52 <MattPerry> LeeF: issue is that some variables, e.g. those in filter, can't get their values from a join
Lee Feigenbaum: issue is that some variables, e.g. those in filter, can't get their values from a join ←
14:17:31 <AndyS> q+
Andy Seaborne: q+ ←
14:17:35 <MattPerry> Olivier: what about MINUS, can it be a substitution?
Olivier Corby: what about MINUS, can it be a substitution? ←
14:17:40 <LeeF> ack AndyS
Lee Feigenbaum: ack AndyS ←
14:17:45 <ericP> q+
Eric Prud'hommeaux: q+ ←
14:17:57 <MattPerry> AndyS: I would think that substitution would work for MINUS
Andy Seaborne: I would think that substitution would work for MINUS ←
14:18:12 <SteveH> I don't like the approach of conflating parameterised queries and pre-binding, they're different
Steve Harris: I don't like the approach of conflating parameterised queries and pre-binding, they're different ←
14:18:27 <LeeF> ack ericP
Lee Feigenbaum: ack ericP ←
14:19:19 <MattPerry> ericP: biggest issue is the FILTER issue
Eric Prud'hommeaux: biggest issue is the FILTER issue ←
14:21:17 <SteveH> q+ to ask why bindings goes at the "end"
Steve Harris: q+ to ask why bindings goes at the "end" ←
14:21:57 <MattPerry> ... I would go with the same semantics we used with OPTIONAL, the FILTER works on the previous set of variables
... I would go with the same semantics we used with OPTIONAL, the FILTER works on the previous set of variables ←
14:22:07 <LeeF> ack SteveH
Lee Feigenbaum: ack SteveH ←
14:22:07 <Zakim> SteveH, you wanted to ask why bindings goes at the "end"
Zakim IRC Bot: SteveH, you wanted to ask why bindings goes at the "end" ←
14:23:23 <AndyS> q+
Andy Seaborne: q+ ←
14:23:28 <MattPerry> ericP: BINDINGS go at the end because you may want to stream the result, and this is only possible if the query is done before you get the bindings
Eric Prud'hommeaux: BINDINGS go at the end because you may want to stream the result, and this is only possible if the query is done before you get the bindings ←
14:24:52 <LeeF> ack AndyS
Lee Feigenbaum: ack AndyS ←
14:25:35 <MattPerry> AndyS: if you see the query first, you can do a "prepare" on the query
Andy Seaborne: if you see the query first, you can do a "prepare" on the query ←
14:26:41 <MattPerry> ericP: optional has a left pattern, right pattern and filter ... the filter works on the left and right pattern
Eric Prud'hommeaux: optional has a left pattern, right pattern and filter ... the filter works on the left and right pattern ←
14:27:03 <kasei> I don't think people would ever figure that out.
Gregory Williams: I don't think people would ever figure that out. ←
14:27:05 <MattPerry> ... filters now have a left and right where right comes from the BINDINGS
... filters now have a left and right where right comes from the BINDINGS ←
14:28:29 <MattPerry> ericP: I think that if people are given a mandate for substitution, they will still figure out a way to do it with joins but this may be difficult for people
Eric Prud'hommeaux: I think that if people are given a mandate for substitution, they will still figure out a way to do it with joins but this may be difficult for people ←
14:28:44 <SteveH> +1 to ericP
Steve Harris: +1 to ericP ←
14:29:22 <MattPerry> AndyS: substitution is not a new operation in the algebra, but a new join is a new operation
Andy Seaborne: substitution is not a new operation in the algebra, but a new join is a new operation ←
14:29:31 <SteveH> that's the problem
Steve Harris: that's the problem ←
14:30:09 <MattPerry> SteveH: the problem is implementing a substitution operation
Steve Harris: the problem is implementing a substitution operation ←
14:31:18 <MattPerry> AndyS: I think the FILTER case is the important one
Andy Seaborne: I think the FILTER case is the important one ←
14:31:45 <MattPerry> LeeF: is the working group motivated to make the FILTER case work
Lee Feigenbaum: is the working group motivated to make the FILTER case work ←
14:31:48 <AndyS> q+
Andy Seaborne: q+ ←
14:32:27 <kasei> q+
Gregory Williams: q+ ←
14:32:29 <LeeF> ack AndyS
Lee Feigenbaum: ack AndyS ←
14:32:30 <ericP> i'm happy to leave it out for now
Eric Prud'hommeaux: i'm happy to leave it out for now ←
14:32:35 <ericP> but i'm not the alpha team contact
Eric Prud'hommeaux: but i'm not the alpha team contact ←
14:33:10 <MattPerry> SteveH: BINDINGS keyword does not imply substitution to me
Steve Harris: BINDINGS keyword does not imply substitution to me ←
14:33:15 <LeeF> ack, kasei
Lee Feigenbaum: ack, kasei ←
14:33:31 <LeeF> ack kasei
Lee Feigenbaum: ack kasei ←
14:34:11 <MattPerry> kasei: I agree with SteveH on most of the issues ... BINDINGS imply a join to me
Gregory Williams: I agree with SteveH on most of the issues ... BINDINGS imply a join to me ←
14:34:50 <SteveH> well put kasei
Steve Harris: well put kasei ←
14:34:57 <MattPerry> ... BINDINGS should give same execution but just a subset of the results ... substitution could give different results
... BINDINGS should give same execution but just a subset of the results ... substitution could give different results ←
14:35:06 <pgearon> +1 to kasei's POV
Paula Gearon: +1 to kasei's POV ←
14:36:11 <LeeF> straw poll: should the values in rows in the BINDINGS clause be available within FILTERs etc. within the query a la AndyS's proposal?
Lee Feigenbaum: straw poll: should the values in rows in the BINDINGS clause be available within FILTERs etc. within the query a la AndyS's proposal? ←
14:36:35 <SteveH> that statement is not correct
Steve Harris: that statement is not correct ←
14:37:34 <MattPerry> SteveH: this is about what happens when you have a variable in Filter but not in the graph pattern
Steve Harris: this is about what happens when you have a variable in Filter but not in the graph pattern ←
14:38:05 <LeeF> straw poll: should the BINDINGS clause have Join or Substitution semantics?
Lee Feigenbaum: straw poll: should the BINDINGS clause have Join or Substitution semantics? ←
14:38:21 <kasei> Join
Gregory Williams: Join ←
14:38:23 <SteveH> Join
Steve Harris: Join ←
14:38:28 <pgearon> join
Paula Gearon: join ←
14:38:28 <ericP> join
Eric Prud'hommeaux: join ←
14:38:29 <NickH> Join
Nicholas Humfrey: Join ←
14:38:31 <MattPerry> join
join ←
14:38:40 <bglimm> 0 (not enough understanding of the issues)
Birte Glimm: 0 (not enough understanding of the issues) ←
14:38:46 <Souri> +1 to Andy's substitution proposal (if I understand it correctly, substitution of the values from each binding row and then querying would return some results)
Souripriya Das: +1 to Andy's substitution proposal (if I understand it correctly, substitution of the values from each binding row and then querying would return some results) ←
14:38:47 <OlivierCorby> 0 too
Olivier Corby: 0 too ←
14:39:08 <LeeF> 0
Lee Feigenbaum: 0 ←
14:39:12 <ericP> 7
14:39:13 <AndyS> filter visibility
Andy Seaborne: filter visibility ←
14:39:14 <sandro> 0
Sandro Hawke: 0 ←
14:40:00 <SteveH> q+ to ask about templating
Steve Harris: q+ to ask about templating ←
14:40:07 <LeeF> ack SteveH
Lee Feigenbaum: ack SteveH ←
14:40:07 <Zakim> SteveH, you wanted to ask about templating
Zakim IRC Bot: SteveH, you wanted to ask about templating ←
14:40:27 <LeeF> The group has general consensus to keep the semantics of BINDINGS as is for now.
Lee Feigenbaum: The group has general consensus to keep the semantics of BINDINGS as is for now. ←
14:40:27 <MattPerry> SteveH: is templating on our to-do list?
Steve Harris: is templating on our to-do list? ←
14:40:45 <MattPerry> LeeF: templating missed the cut for 1.1
Lee Feigenbaum: templating missed the cut for 1.1 ←
14:41:11 <MattPerry> subtopic: isNumeric
14:41:16 <LeeF> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0410.html
Lee Feigenbaum: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0410.html ←
14:41:17 <SteveH> +1 to isNumeric()
Steve Harris: +1 to isNumeric() ←
14:42:13 <LeeF> SUM(?x)
Lee Feigenbaum: SUM(?x) ←
14:42:13 <MattPerry> SteveH: isNumeric is very useful for numeric operations due to the weak typing
Steve Harris: isNumeric is very useful for numeric operations due to the weak typing ←
14:42:47 <MattPerry> SteveH: right now, we go to xpath numeric-add operation
Steve Harris: right now, we go to xpath numeric-add operation ←
14:43:02 <LeeF> SUM(IF(isNumeric(?x), ?x, 0))
Lee Feigenbaum: SUM(IF(isNumeric(?x), ?x, 0)) ←
14:43:02 <MattPerry> ... a date, for example, will give a type error
... a date, for example, will give a type error ←
14:43:18 <AndyS> sum("a") is legal :-)
Andy Seaborne: sum("a") is legal :-) ←
14:43:28 <SteveH> AndyS, yeah, semi-deliberate :)
Steve Harris: AndyS, yeah, semi-deliberate :) ←
14:43:31 <LeeF> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0460.html
Lee Feigenbaum: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0460.html ←
14:44:14 <LeeF> PROPOSED: Include an isNumeric function in SPARQL 1.1
PROPOSED: Include an isNumeric function in SPARQL 1.1 ←
14:44:27 <AndyS> seconded
Andy Seaborne: seconded ←
14:44:45 <LeeF> RESOLVED: Include an isNumeric function in SPARQL 1.1
RESOLVED: Include an isNumeric function in SPARQL 1.1 ←
14:45:13 <AndyS> SteveH, I implemented the more obvious way
Andy Seaborne: SteveH, I implemented the more obvious way ←
14:45:29 <SteveH> AndyS, which is that? :)
Steve Harris: AndyS, which is that? :) ←
14:45:31 <MattPerry> topic: go through document reviews
14:45:40 <AndyS> sum("a") -> error
Andy Seaborne: sum("a") -> error ←
14:45:48 <MattPerry> subtopic: query
14:45:54 <SteveH> ah, right, that's what I'm going to write in when I have time
Steve Harris: ah, right, that's what I'm going to write in when I have time ←
14:46:06 <AndyS> like sum("a"+0) or sum("a", 0) -> error
Andy Seaborne: like sum("a"+0) or sum("a", 0) -> error ←
14:46:12 <SteveH> right
Steve Harris: right ←
14:46:20 <ericP> q+ to ask if federation is rolled in
Eric Prud'hommeaux: q+ to ask if federation is rolled in ←
14:46:48 <LeeF> ack, ericP
Lee Feigenbaum: ack, ericP ←
14:46:51 <LeeF> ack ericP
Lee Feigenbaum: ack ericP ←
14:46:51 <Zakim> ericP, you wanted to ask if federation is rolled in
Zakim IRC Bot: ericP, you wanted to ask if federation is rolled in ←
14:47:13 <MattPerry> ericP: who is editor of federation?
Eric Prud'hommeaux: who is editor of federation? ←
14:48:45 <MattPerry> ericP: I can take a look at the comments for federation
Eric Prud'hommeaux: I can take a look at the comments for federation ←
14:49:21 <MattPerry> I fine with it
I'm fine with it ←
14:49:24 <kasei> me too
Gregory Williams: me too ←
14:49:28 <MattPerry> s/I/I'm
14:49:33 <SteveH> actually, I'd like to make a couple of edits, based on reviews
Steve Harris: actually, I'd like to make a couple of edits, based on reviews ←
14:49:38 <SteveH> if that wont gum up the process
Steve Harris: if that wont gum up the process ←
14:49:41 <SteveH> otherwise its fine
Steve Harris: otherwise its fine ←
14:50:45 <MattPerry> SteveH: some non-algebraic changes I would like to make
Steve Harris: some non-algebraic changes I would like to make ←
14:51:23 <MattPerry> LeeF: should be fine if you do it by Friday
Lee Feigenbaum: should be fine if you do it by Friday ←
14:51:47 <LeeF> PROPOSED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml + Steve's wording changes in response to Greg's comments as Working Draft
PROPOSED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml + Steve's wording changes in response to Greg's comments as Working Draft ←
14:52:37 <LeeF> PROPOSED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml + editorial changes in response to Greg's comments as Working Draft
PROPOSED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml + editorial changes in response to Greg's comments as Working Draft ←
14:52:45 <AndyS> 0.5
Andy Seaborne: 0.5 ←
14:52:50 <SteveH> 1
Steve Harris: 1 ←
14:53:43 <MattPerry> AndyS: would like to process all the comments first
Andy Seaborne: would like to process all the comments first ←
14:54:30 <SteveH> I'm also not swapped in on that
Steve Harris: I'm also not swapped in on that ←
14:54:32 <LeeF> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0454.html
Lee Feigenbaum: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0454.html ←
14:55:12 <MattPerry> LeeF: lets hold off on publishing for now and try to go through all docs next week
Lee Feigenbaum: lets hold off on publishing for now and try to go through all docs next week ←
14:55:44 <AndyS> q+ to ask about isNumeric (get in if possible?)
Andy Seaborne: q+ to ask about isNumeric (get in if possible?) ←
14:56:18 <SteveH> and fix sum("a") on same basis
Steve Harris: and fix sum("a") on same basis ←
14:56:18 <LeeF> ack AndyS
Lee Feigenbaum: ack AndyS ←
14:56:18 <Zakim> AndyS, you wanted to ask about isNumeric (get in if possible?)
Zakim IRC Bot: AndyS, you wanted to ask about isNumeric (get in if possible?) ←
14:56:20 <MattPerry> AndyS: I can try to put in isNumeric
Andy Seaborne: I can try to put in isNumeric ←
14:57:14 <bglimm> Zakim, unmute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, unmute me ←
14:57:14 <Zakim> bglimm should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should no longer be muted ←
14:57:48 <MattPerry> kasei: will summarize what changes went into service description
Gregory Williams: will summarize what changes went into service description ←
14:58:08 <MattPerry> bglimm: service description is ready from my point of view
Birte Glimm: service description is ready from my point of view ←
14:58:20 <MattPerry> ... entailment is awaiting LeeF's review
... entailment is awaiting LeeF's review ←
14:58:45 <MattPerry> Olivier: entilment is ok with me
Olivier Corby: entailment is ok with me ←
14:58:54 <MattPerry> s/entilment/entailment
14:59:02 <SteveH> bye all
Steve Harris: bye all ←
14:59:03 <MattPerry> bye
bye ←
14:59:06 <Zakim> -LeeF
Zakim IRC Bot: -LeeF ←
14:59:08 <Zakim> -pgearon
Zakim IRC Bot: -pgearon ←
14:59:08 <NickH> bye!
Nicholas Humfrey: bye! ←
14:59:10 <Zakim> -SteveH
Zakim IRC Bot: -SteveH ←
14:59:11 <LeeF> Matt, thanks very much for scribingg
Lee Feigenbaum: Matt, thanks very much for scribingg ←
14:59:12 <Zakim> -Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro ←
14:59:14 <Zakim> -bglimm
Zakim IRC Bot: -bglimm ←
14:59:16 <Zakim> -kasei
Zakim IRC Bot: -kasei ←
14:59:18 <Zakim> -MattPerry
Zakim IRC Bot: -MattPerry ←
14:59:20 <Zakim> -EricP
Zakim IRC Bot: -EricP ←
14:59:22 <Zakim> -NickH
Zakim IRC Bot: -NickH ←
14:59:24 <Zakim> -Souri
Zakim IRC Bot: -Souri ←
14:59:30 <Zakim> -OlivierCorby
Zakim IRC Bot: -OlivierCorby ←
14:59:32 <Zakim> -AndyS
Zakim IRC Bot: -AndyS ←
14:59:36 <Zakim> SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended ←
14:59:38 <Zakim> Attendees were MattPerry, LeeF, +1.310.729.aaaa, kasei, pgearon, AndyS, Sandro, SteveH_, bglimm, Souri, NickH, SteveH, OlivierCorby, EricP
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were MattPerry, LeeF, +1.310.729.aaaa, kasei, pgearon, AndyS, Sandro, SteveH_, bglimm, Souri, NickH, SteveH, OlivierCorby, EricP ←
17:33:19 <AndyS> Defining what it means to be numeric. Reusing some of ericP's fine words.
(No events recorded for 153 minutes)
Andy Seaborne: Defining what it means to be numeric. Reusing some of ericP's fine words. ←
17:51:34 <AndyS> isNumeric added to rq25. Note: the lexical form of the term must be valid ("1220"^^xsd:byte is not) to make it consistent with numeric operations. And RDF-MT.
(No events recorded for 18 minutes)
Andy Seaborne: isNumeric added to rq25. Note: the lexical form of the term must be valid ("1220"^^xsd:byte is not) to make it consistent with numeric operations. And RDF-MT. ←
Formatted by CommonScribe