edit

RDF Working Group Teleconference

Minutes of 23 March 2011

Agenda
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2011.03.23
Seen
Alex Hall, Andy Seaborne, Antoine Zimmermann, Axel Polleres, David Wood, Fabien Gandon, Ivan Herman, Jean-François Baget, Jeremy Carroll, Lee Feigenbaum, Manu Sporny, Mischa Tuffield, Nathan Rixham, Olivier Corby, Patrick Hayes, Peter Patel-Schneider, Richard Cyganiak, Sandro Hawke, Souripriya Das, Thomas Steiner, Unknown Tony, William Waites, Zhe Wu
Chair
David Wood
Scribe
Jeremy Carroll
IRC Log
Original
Resolutions
  1. Minutes http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-03-16 accepted link
Topics

There are some format problems with the chatlog. Please correct them and reload this page. They are labeled on this page in a red box, like this message.

It may be helpful to

14:58:52 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/03/23-rdf-wg-irc

RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/03/23-rdf-wg-irc ←

14:58:54 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world

Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←

14:58:54 <JeremyCarroll> Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2011.03.23
14:58:56 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 73394

Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 73394 ←

14:58:56 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes ←

14:58:57 <trackbot> Meeting: RDF Working Group Teleconference
14:58:57 <trackbot> Date: 23 March 2011
14:59:50 <davidwood> Chair: David Wood
14:59:51 <LeeF> zakim, this wil be rdf-wg

Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, this wil be rdf-wg ←

14:59:51 <Zakim> I don't understand 'this wil be rdf-wg', LeeF

Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand 'this wil be rdf-wg', LeeF ←

14:59:54 <LeeF> zakim, this will be rdf-wg

Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, this will be rdf-wg ←

14:59:54 <Zakim> I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, LeeF

Zakim IRC Bot: I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, LeeF ←

14:59:57 <LeeF> zakim, this will be rdfwg

Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, this will be rdfwg ←

14:59:57 <Zakim> ok, LeeF, I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM already started

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, LeeF, I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM already started ←

14:59:57 <Zakim> +OlivierCorby

Zakim IRC Bot: +OlivierCorby ←

14:59:59 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]

Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←

15:00:00 <Zakim> + +1.415.369.aabb

Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.415.369.aabb ←

15:00:03 <davidwood> Scribe: Jeremy Carroll

(Scribe set to Jeremy Carroll)

15:00:12 <JeremyCarroll> Zakim, aabb is me

Zakim, aabb is me ←

15:00:12 <Zakim> +JeremyCarroll; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +JeremyCarroll; got it ←

15:00:13 <davidwood> Scribenick: JeremyCarroll
15:00:13 <Zakim> -[IPcaller]

Zakim IRC Bot: -[IPcaller] ←

15:00:24 <davidwood> zakim, who is here?

David Wood: zakim, who is here? ←

15:00:24 <Zakim> On the phone I see Tony, David, Sandro, LeeF, +1.408.642.aaaa, OlivierCorby, JeremyCarroll

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Tony, David, Sandro, LeeF, +1.408.642.aaaa, OlivierCorby, JeremyCarroll ←

15:00:28 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]

Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←

15:00:34 <AndyS> zakim, IPCaler i sme

Andy Seaborne: zakim, IPCaler i sme ←

15:00:34 <Zakim> I don't understand 'IPCaler i sme', AndyS

Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand 'IPCaler i sme', AndyS ←

15:00:42 <AndyS> zakim, IPCaller is me

Andy Seaborne: zakim, IPCaller is me ←

15:00:42 <Zakim> +AndyS; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +AndyS; got it ←

15:00:50 <Zakim> +??P13

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P13 ←

15:00:52 <Zakim> +??P17

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P17 ←

15:00:54 <Zakim> +??P14

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P14 ←

15:00:59 <manu1> zakim, I am ??P14

Manu Sporny: zakim, I am ??P14 ←

15:00:59 <Zakim> +manu1; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +manu1; got it ←

15:01:11 <mischat_> zakim, ??P13 is me

Mischa Tuffield: zakim, ??P13 is me ←

15:01:13 <Zakim> +mischat_; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +mischat_; got it ←

15:01:18 <Zakim> + +1.443.212.aacc

Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.443.212.aacc ←

15:01:28 <Zakim> +tomayac_

Zakim IRC Bot: +tomayac_ ←

15:01:29 <zwu2> zakim, mute me

Zhe Wu: zakim, mute me ←

15:01:30 <Zakim> sorry, zwu2, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you

Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, zwu2, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you ←

15:01:37 <JeremyCarroll> Zakim, mute me

Zakim, mute me ←

15:01:37 <Zakim> sorry, JeremyCarroll, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you

Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, JeremyCarroll, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you ←

15:01:38 <AlexHall> zakim, �01+1.443.212.aacc� is me

Alex Hall: zakim, �01+1.443.212.aacc� is me ←

15:01:39 <Zakim> sorry, AlexHall, I do not recognize a party named '�01+1.443.212.aacc�'

Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, AlexHall, I do not recognize a party named '�01+1.443.212.aacc�' ←

15:01:50 <Zakim> +PatH

Zakim IRC Bot: +PatH ←

15:01:51 <Zakim> -??P17

Zakim IRC Bot: -??P17 ←

15:01:57 <JeremyCarroll> Zakim, JeremyCarroll is now JeremyCarroll

Zakim, JeremyCarroll is now JeremyCarroll ←

15:01:57 <Zakim> I don't understand 'JeremyCarroll is now JeremyCarroll', JeremyCarroll

Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand 'JeremyCarroll is now JeremyCarroll', JeremyCarroll ←

15:02:05 <mischat> zakim, mute me

Mischa Tuffield: zakim, mute me ←

15:02:05 <Zakim> mischat_ should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: mischat_ should now be muted ←

15:02:13 <JeremyCarroll> Zakim, mute JeremyCarroll

Zakim, mute JeremyCarroll ←

15:02:13 <Zakim> JeremyCarroll should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: JeremyCarroll should now be muted ←

15:02:21 <Zakim> + +33.4.67.92.aadd

Zakim IRC Bot: + +33.4.67.92.aadd ←

15:02:37 <ivan> zakim, dial ivan-voip

Ivan Herman: zakim, dial ivan-voip ←

15:02:39 <Zakim> ok, ivan; the call is being made

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, ivan; the call is being made ←

15:02:41 <Zakim> +Ivan

Zakim IRC Bot: +Ivan ←

15:02:47 <AndyS> zakim, who is on the phone?

Andy Seaborne: zakim, who is on the phone? ←

15:02:51 <Zakim> On the phone I see Tony, David, Sandro, LeeF, +1.408.642.aaaa, OlivierCorby, JeremyCarroll (muted), AndyS, mischat_ (muted), manu1, +1.443.212.aacc, tomayac_, PatH,

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Tony, David, Sandro, LeeF, +1.408.642.aaaa, OlivierCorby, JeremyCarroll (muted), AndyS, mischat_ (muted), manu1, +1.443.212.aacc, tomayac_, PatH, ←

15:02:57 <JFB> Zakim, +33.4.67.92.aadd is me

Jean-François Baget: Zakim, +33.4.67.92.aadd is me ←

15:02:58 <Zakim> ... +33.4.67.92.aadd, Ivan

Zakim IRC Bot: ... +33.4.67.92.aadd, Ivan ←

15:03:07 <zwu2> zakim, +1.408.642.aaaa is me

Zhe Wu: zakim, +1.408.642.aaaa is me ←

15:03:12 <Zakim> +JFB; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +JFB; got it ←

15:03:28 <Zakim> +zwu2; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +zwu2; got it ←

15:03:28 <JFB> zakim, mute me

Jean-François Baget: zakim, mute me ←

15:03:34 <zwu2> zakim, mute me

Zhe Wu: zakim, mute me ←

15:03:36 <Zakim> +[Sophia]

Zakim IRC Bot: +[Sophia] ←

15:03:44 <Zakim> +??P17

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P17 ←

15:03:48 <Zakim> JFB should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: JFB should now be muted ←

15:03:50 <Zakim> zwu2 should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: zwu2 should now be muted ←

15:03:53 <davidwood> zakim, who is here?

David Wood: zakim, who is here? ←

15:03:56 <mischat> zakim, unmute me

Mischa Tuffield: zakim, unmute me ←

15:03:59 <Zakim> On the phone I see Tony, David, Sandro, LeeF, zwu2 (muted), OlivierCorby, JeremyCarroll (muted), AndyS, mischat_ (muted), manu1, +1.443.212.aacc, tomayac_, PatH, JFB (muted), Ivan,

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Tony, David, Sandro, LeeF, zwu2 (muted), OlivierCorby, JeremyCarroll (muted), AndyS, mischat_ (muted), manu1, +1.443.212.aacc, tomayac_, PatH, JFB (muted), Ivan, ←

15:03:59 <AlexHall> zakim, 1.443.212.aacc is me

Alex Hall: zakim, 1.443.212.aacc is me ←

15:04:01 <mischat> zakim, unmute me

Mischa Tuffield: zakim, unmute me ←

15:04:04 <Zakim> ... [Sophia], ??P17

Zakim IRC Bot: ... [Sophia], ??P17 ←

15:04:06 <FabGandon> zakim, [Sophia] is me

Fabien Gandon: zakim, [Sophia] is me ←

15:04:10 <Zakim> On the phone I see Tony, David, Sandro, LeeF, zwu2 (muted), OlivierCorby, JeremyCarroll (muted), AndyS, mischat_ (muted), manu1, +1.443.212.aacc, tomayac_, PatH, JFB (muted), Ivan,

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Tony, David, Sandro, LeeF, zwu2 (muted), OlivierCorby, JeremyCarroll (muted), AndyS, mischat_ (muted), manu1, +1.443.212.aacc, tomayac_, PatH, JFB (muted), Ivan, ←

15:04:19 <Zakim> ... [Sophia], ??P17

Zakim IRC Bot: ... [Sophia], ??P17 ←

15:04:20 <manu1> zakim, who is making noise?

Manu Sporny: zakim, who is making noise? ←

15:04:25 <Zakim> sorry, AlexHall, I do not recognize a party named '1.443.212.aacc'

Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, AlexHall, I do not recognize a party named '1.443.212.aacc' ←

15:04:29 <Zakim> mischat_ should no longer be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: mischat_ should no longer be muted ←

15:04:39 <Zakim> +FabGandon; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +FabGandon; got it ←

15:04:44 <mischat> zakim, mute me

Mischa Tuffield: zakim, mute me ←

15:04:56 <davidwood> zakim, who is speaking?

David Wood: zakim, who is speaking? ←

15:05:06 <Zakim> manu1, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: mischat_ (58%), ??P17 (89%)

Zakim IRC Bot: manu1, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: mischat_ (58%), ??P17 (89%) ←

15:05:08 <Zakim> +nunolopes

Zakim IRC Bot: +nunolopes ←

15:05:14 <Zakim> mischat_ should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: mischat_ should now be muted ←

15:05:23 <manu1> zakim, mute ??P17

Manu Sporny: zakim, mute ??P17 ←

15:05:26 <cygri> zakim, nunolopes is me

Richard Cyganiak: zakim, nunolopes is me ←

15:05:38 <Zakim> davidwood, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ??P17 (85%), Ivan (5%)

Zakim IRC Bot: davidwood, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ??P17 (85%), Ivan (5%) ←

15:05:42 <AlexHall> zakim, +1.443.212.aacc is me

Alex Hall: zakim, +1.443.212.aacc is me ←

15:05:44 <Zakim> + +1.603.897.aaee

Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.603.897.aaee ←

15:05:53 <Zakim> ??P17 should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: ??P17 should now be muted ←

15:05:54 <Zakim> -??P17

Zakim IRC Bot: -??P17 ←

15:05:58 <Zakim> +cygri; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +cygri; got it ←

15:06:04 <Zakim> +Peter_Patel-Schneider

Zakim IRC Bot: +Peter_Patel-Schneider ←

15:06:10 <Zakim> +AlexHall; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +AlexHall; got it ←

15:06:23 <Souri_> zakim, who is on the phone?

Souripriya Das: zakim, who is on the phone? ←

15:06:24 <Zakim> +??P43

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P43 ←

15:06:26 <JeremyCarroll> David: welcome everyone - focus on JSON

David Wood: welcome everyone - focus on JSON ←

15:06:26 <JeremyCarroll> Topic: Admin

1. Admin

15:06:32 <webr3> zakim, i am ??P43

Nathan Rixham: zakim, i am ??P43 ←

15:06:34 <Zakim> +??P17

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P17 ←

15:06:40 <Zakim> On the phone I see Tony, David, Sandro, LeeF, zwu2 (muted), OlivierCorby, JeremyCarroll (muted), AndyS, mischat_ (muted), manu1, AlexHall, tomayac_, PatH, JFB (muted), Ivan,

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Tony, David, Sandro, LeeF, zwu2 (muted), OlivierCorby, JeremyCarroll (muted), AndyS, mischat_ (muted), manu1, AlexHall, tomayac_, PatH, JFB (muted), Ivan, ←

15:06:46 <ww> zakim, +??P17 is me

William Waites: zakim, +??P17 is me ←

15:06:47 <Zakim> ... FabGandon, cygri, +1.603.897.aaee, Peter_Patel-Schneider, ??P43, ??P17

Zakim IRC Bot: ... FabGandon, cygri, +1.603.897.aaee, Peter_Patel-Schneider, ??P43, ??P17 ←

15:06:51 <Zakim> +webr3; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +webr3; got it ←

15:06:52 <sandro> zakim, who is talking?

Sandro Hawke: zakim, who is talking? ←

15:06:57 <Zakim> sorry, ww, I do not recognize a party named '+??P17'

Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, ww, I do not recognize a party named '+??P17' ←

15:06:58 <Souri_> zakim, aaee is me

Souripriya Das: zakim, aaee is me ←

15:07:06 <Zakim> +Souri_; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +Souri_; got it ←

15:07:08 <Zakim> sandro, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: David (25%), ??P17 (59%), Ivan (20%)

Zakim IRC Bot: sandro, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: David (25%), ??P17 (59%), Ivan (20%) ←

15:07:12 <ww> zakim, ??P17 is me

William Waites: zakim, ??P17 is me ←

15:07:12 <Zakim> +ww; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +ww; got it ←

15:07:15 <sandro> zakim, mute P17

Sandro Hawke: zakim, mute P17 ←

15:07:15 <Zakim> sorry, sandro, I do not know which phone connection belongs to P17

Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, sandro, I do not know which phone connection belongs to P17 ←

15:07:16 <ww> zakim, mute me

William Waites: zakim, mute me ←

15:07:17 <Zakim> ww should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: ww should now be muted ←

15:07:46 <davidwood> PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 16 March telecon:

David Wood: PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 16 March telecon: ←

15:07:46 <pfps> Minutes are acceptable, even with minor issues

Peter Patel-Schneider: Minutes are acceptable, even with minor issues ←

15:07:46 <davidwood>    http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-03-16

David Wood: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-03-16 ←

15:07:52 <manu1> +1 to accept the minutes

Manu Sporny: +1 to accept the minutes ←

15:07:56 <tomayac> +1 to accept

Thomas Steiner: +1 to accept ←

15:07:58 <JFB> +1 to accept

Jean-François Baget: +1 to accept ←

15:08:00 <JeremyCarroll> RESOLVED: Minutes http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-03-16 accepted

RESOLVED: Minutes http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-03-16 accepted ←

15:08:20 <JeremyCarroll> No pending action items to review

No pending action items to review ←

15:09:18 <JeremyCarroll> subtopic: Action Item Review

1.1. Action Item Review

15:09:18 <JeremyCarroll> subsubtopic: Action-4
1.1.1. ACTION-4
15:09:18 <JeremyCarroll> Action-4 is open, another use case has been added

ACTION-4 is open, another use case has been added ←

15:09:40 <JeremyCarroll> Suggested to close it since the use case has been added

Suggested to close it since the use case has been added ←

15:09:48 <JeremyCarroll> Closed. Danbri did the action

Closed. Danbri did the action ←

15:09:58 <JeremyCarroll> subsubtopic: Action-6
1.1.2. ACTION-6
15:11:13 <mischat> zakim, unmute me

Mischa Tuffield: zakim, unmute me ←

15:11:13 <Zakim> mischat_ should no longer be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: mischat_ should no longer be muted ←

15:11:16 <JeremyCarroll> subsubtopic: ACTION-19
1.1.3. ACTION-19
15:11:34 <JeremyCarroll> Richard has started this but is still working on it

Richard has started this but is still working on it ←

15:11:51 <JeremyCarroll> This action is time consuming because it involves a lot of software

This action is time consuming because it involves a lot of software ←

15:12:10 <JeremyCarroll> His goal is to list import formats and to explore output formats

His goal is to list import formats and to explore output formats ←

15:12:14 <mischat> zakim, mute me

Mischa Tuffield: zakim, mute me ←

15:12:14 <Zakim> mischat_ should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: mischat_ should now be muted ←

15:13:15 <JeremyCarroll> subsubtopic: ACTION-20
1.1.4. ACTION-20
15:13:15 <JeremyCarroll> TomSteiner is trying to get side by side comparison

TomSteiner is trying to get side by side comparison ←

15:13:36 <tomayac> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-JSON#JSON_Serializations_By_Example

Thomas Steiner: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-JSON#JSON_Serializations_By_Example ←

15:13:41 <zwu2> sounds good

Zhe Wu: sounds good ←

15:14:48 <JeremyCarroll> this action is still open, input data is being gathered

this action is still open, input data is being gathered ←

15:15:18 <JeremyCarroll> test cases will be added to Wiki

test cases will be added to Wiki ←

15:09:18 <JeremyCarroll> subtopic: F2F Preparation

1.2. F2F Preparation

15:16:21 <JeremyCarroll> Please respond to f2f proposal as to whether you are attending or not

(No events recorded for 7 minutes)

Please respond to f2f proposal as to whether you are attending or not ←

15:16:33 <JeremyCarroll> Hotels in Amsterdam filling up on Thursday

Hotels in Amsterdam filling up on Thursday ←

15:16:44 <Souri_> Is attending the F2F remotely from Boston area an option?

Souripriya Das: Is attending the F2F remotely from Boston area an option? ←

15:27:02 <Souri_> Is attending the first F2F remotely from Boston area an option? I remember that Ivan had said that it is not. Just trying to confirm.

(No events recorded for 10 minutes)

Souripriya Das: Is attending the first F2F remotely from Boston area an option? I remember that Ivan had said that it is not. Just trying to confirm. ←

15:16:56 <JeremyCarroll> Topic: JSON

2. JSON

15:17:20 <manu1> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Mar/0521.html

Manu Sporny: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Mar/0521.html ←

15:18:05 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: presents where we are at

Manu Sporny: presents where we are at ←

15:18:23 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: TF telecon report back

Manu Sporny: TF telecon report back ←

15:18:44 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: TF agrees that a JSON format would be a good thing

Manu Sporny: TF agrees that a JSON format would be a good thing ←

15:19:01 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: sense of urgency was low-to-moderate

Manu Sporny: sense of urgency was low-to-moderate ←

15:19:23 <AndyS> --> JSON format for SPARQL results

Andy Seaborne: --> JSON format for SPARQL results ←

15:20:15 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: half group were concerned about govt and enterprise

Manu Sporny: half group were concerned about govt and enterprise ←

15:20:47 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: half more concerned abotu independent developers

Manu Sporny: half more concerned abotu independent developers ←

15:21:48 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: we need to make sure that we keep as many people on board as possible

Manu Sporny: we need to make sure that we keep as many people on board as possible ←

15:21:58 <JeremyCarroll> Pat: why do motivations matter?

Patrick Hayes: why do motivations matter? ←

15:22:20 <davidwood> q?

David Wood: q? ←

15:22:21 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: there are technical consequences given motivations, e.g. APIs vs publishing formats

Manu Sporny: there are technical consequences given motivations, e.g. APIs vs publishing formats ←

15:22:39 <Zakim> +??P46

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P46 ←

15:22:45 <ww> zakim, ??P46 is me

William Waites: zakim, ??P46 is me ←

15:22:45 <Zakim> +ww; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +ww; got it ←

15:22:49 <ww> zakim, mute me

William Waites: zakim, mute me ←

15:22:49 <Zakim> ww was already muted, ww

Zakim IRC Bot: ww was already muted, ww ←

15:22:56 <zwu2> is it possible to build adapters/bridges between two different RDF/JSON serialization formats?

Zhe Wu: is it possible to build adapters/bridges between two different RDF/JSON serialization formats? ←

15:23:11 <webr3> everything is possible :)

Nathan Rixham: everything is possible :) ←

15:23:35 <zwu2> is there an efficient way then?

Zhe Wu: is there an efficient way then? ←

15:23:52 <AndyS> zwu2 - RDF?

Andy Seaborne: zwu2 - RDF? ←

15:24:17 <zwu2> RDF/JSON, andy

Zhe Wu: RDF/JSON, andy ←

15:23:29 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: doamin of interest, and use cases, and technical solutions are all interrelated

Manu Sporny: doamin of interest, and use cases, and technical solutions are all interrelated ←

15:23:53 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: if we do not have enough people interested in a topic then we will not be able to pursue such a technical soln

Manu Sporny: if we do not have enough people interested in a topic then we will not be able to pursue such a technical soln ←

15:24:18 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: there was discussion concerning round tripping

Manu Sporny: there was discussion concerning round tripping ←

15:24:41 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: round tripping - can data that is GET ted then be POST ed back

Manu Sporny: round tripping - can data that is GET ted then be POST ed back ←

15:24:46 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: without data loss

Manu Sporny: without data loss ←

15:25:19 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: it seemed clear when people spoke what they wanted, but not clear that there was consensus in TF

Manu Sporny: it seemed clear when people spoke what they wanted, but not clear that there was consensus in TF ←

15:25:28 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: issue of premature standardization

Manu Sporny: issue of premature standardization ←

15:26:00 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: this is a strong concern, unclear whether some JSON solutions will work,

Manu Sporny: this is a strong concern, unclear whether some JSON solutions will work, ←

15:26:08 <ww> JSON-UL?

William Waites: JSON-UL? ←

15:26:41 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: there is general unfamiliarity with some formats, cf: ACTION-20

Manu Sporny: there is general unfamiliarity with some formats, cf: ACTION-20 ←

15:27:08 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: many motivations behind different formats are currently not well understood by many members of group

Manu Sporny: many motivations behind different formats are currently not well understood by many members of group ←

15:27:50 <webr3> q+

Nathan Rixham: q+ ←

15:28:06 <JeremyCarroll> David: can we use use cases to understand different people's preferences

David Wood: can we use use cases to understand different people's preferences ←

15:28:30 <webr3> q-

Nathan Rixham: q- ←

15:29:11 <cygri> davidwood++

Richard Cyganiak: davidwood++ ←

15:29:14 <davidwood> ack web3r

David Wood: ack web3r ←

15:29:26 <Zakim> -OlivierCorby

Zakim IRC Bot: -OlivierCorby ←

15:29:44 <JeremyCarroll> David: this would help in seeing what work can be resourced properly, and possibly help in reaching consensus

David Wood: this would help in seeing what work can be resourced properly, and possibly help in reaching consensus ←

15:30:18 <webr3> action: nathan to group json use cases on wiki

ACTION: nathan to group json use cases on wiki ←

15:30:18 <trackbot> Created ACTION-22 - Group json use cases on wiki [on Nathan Rixham - due 2011-03-30].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-22 - Group json use cases on wiki [on Nathan Rixham - due 2011-03-30]. ←

15:30:47 <ivan> zakim, mute me

Ivan Herman: zakim, mute me ←

15:30:47 <Zakim> Ivan should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: Ivan should now be muted ←

15:30:56 <cygri> q+

Richard Cyganiak: q+ ←

15:31:00 <Zakim> +OlivierCorby

Zakim IRC Bot: +OlivierCorby ←

15:31:15 <davidwood> ack cygri

David Wood: ack cygri ←

15:32:17 <sandro> q?

Sandro Hawke: q? ←

15:32:22 <JeremyCarroll> Richard: agrees that grouping use cases will help

Richard Cyganiak: agrees that grouping use cases will help ←

15:33:02 <JeremyCarroll> David (as Talis rep, not chair): there is no internal consensus about this issue, but there are strong opinions

David (as Talis rep, not chair): there is no internal consensus about this issue, but there are strong opinions ←

15:33:24 <JeremyCarroll> David (...): 1 opinion is that an API is needed, otherwise format is doomed

David (...): 1 opinion is that an API is needed, otherwise format is doomed ←

15:33:38 <webr3> David, can you clarify what you mean by "API" (api as in tooling for consumers) or "API" as in linked-data-api ?

Nathan Rixham: David, can you clarify what you mean by "API" (api as in tooling for consumers) or "API" as in linked-data-api ? ←

15:33:39 <JeremyCarroll> David (...): 2 opinion is triple format is crucial

David (...): 2 opinion is triple format is crucial ←

15:34:13 <JeremyCarroll> David (...): as rep it is hard to map different people's opinions onto use cases

David (...): as rep it is hard to map different people's opinions onto use cases ←

15:34:42 <JeremyCarroll> David: Guus prefers a bottom up approach

David Wood: Guus prefers a bottom up approach ←

15:35:12 <JeremyCarroll> David: Guus wants minimal approach, adding features with motivation

David Wood: Guus wants minimal approach, adding features with motivation ←

15:35:30 <webr3> David, next q - by "starting point" did you mean a simple object then add, or a simple triple, then add?

Nathan Rixham: David, next q - by "starting point" did you mean a simple object then add, or a simple triple, then add? ←

15:35:36 <davidwood> q?

David Wood: q? ←

15:35:49 <davidwood> webr3: yes

Nathan Rixham: yes [ Scribe Assist by David Wood ] ←

15:35:58 <sandro> url for RDF API spec?

Sandro Hawke: url for RDF API spec? ←

15:36:11 <davidwood> webr3: oops :)  I meant a simple object.

Nathan Rixham: oops :) I meant a simple object. [ Scribe Assist by David Wood ] ←

15:36:13 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: we would like to see more people on APIs in JavaScript or Python

Manu Sporny: we would like to see more people on APIs in JavaScript or Python ←

15:36:25 <webr3> Sandro, http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdf-api/

Nathan Rixham: Sandro, http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdf-api/ ←

15:36:31 <webr3> davidwood, then +1, i agree

Nathan Rixham: davidwood, then +1, i agree ←

15:36:37 <davidwood> sandro: The LOD API spec is at http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdf-api/

Sandro Hawke: The LOD API spec is at http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdf-api/ [ Scribe Assist by David Wood ] ←

15:36:39 <ww> yes. http://bibliographica.org/

William Waites: yes. http://bibliographica.org/ ←

15:36:45 <davidwood> q?

David Wood: q? ←

15:36:52 <davidwood> ack sandro

David Wood: ack sandro ←

15:36:52 <Zakim> sandro, you wanted to talk about the matrix

Zakim IRC Bot: sandro, you wanted to talk about the matrix ←

15:36:59 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: who is shipping a product requiring JSON technologies

Manu Sporny: who is shipping a product requiring JSON technologies ←

15:37:39 <JeremyCarroll> Sandro: I have a hard time understanding use cases - mix of abstraction and concrete

Sandro Hawke: I have a hard time understanding use cases - mix of abstraction and concrete ←

15:37:55 <JeremyCarroll> Sandro: I like the matrix

Sandro Hawke: I like the matrix ←

15:38:18 <manu1> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/JSON_User_Segments

Manu Sporny: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/JSON_User_Segments ←

15:38:22 <JeremyCarroll> Sandro: we are trying to get data from producer to consumer, this gives a square on matrix

Sandro Hawke: we are trying to get data from producer to consumer, this gives a square on matrix ←

15:38:43 <JeremyCarroll> Sandro: each square sort of corresponds to a use case

Sandro Hawke: each square sort of corresponds to a use case ←

15:39:24 <sandro> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/JSON_User_Segments

Sandro Hawke: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/JSON_User_Segments ←

15:39:24 <ww> mischat: the data store is rdf. the user interface is json/resty thing and web developers that know about rdf are hard to come by. so need to translate json i/o to rdf i/o

Mischa Tuffield: the data store is rdf. the user interface is json/resty thing and web developers that know about rdf are hard to come by. so need to translate json i/o to rdf i/o [ Scribe Assist by William Waites ] ←

15:39:26 <JeremyCarroll> some consumers want RDF, some don't

some consumers want RDF, some don't ←

15:39:43 <JeremyCarroll> some consumers are happy to use a library, others are not happy to use a library

some consumers are happy to use a library, others are not happy to use a library ←

15:39:56 <ww> which we've already done in an application-specific way but it would be nice to have a more standard/consistent way

William Waites: which we've already done in an application-specific way but it would be nice to have a more standard/consistent way ←

15:41:18 <JeremyCarroll> sandro: if people are not rpepared to use library, then encoding has to be really simple

Sandro Hawke: if people are not rpepared to use library, then encoding has to be really simple ←

15:41:42 <JeremyCarroll> sandro: this is where Talis' products are at - simple encoding

Sandro Hawke: this is where Talis' products are at - simple encoding ←

15:41:54 <ww> as an example: our franken-simpleish-json: http://bnb.bibliographica.org/entry/GB5105626.json

William Waites: as an example: our franken-simpleish-json: http://bnb.bibliographica.org/entry/GB5105626.json ←

15:42:48 <JeremyCarroll> David: is there a difference between librarys or APIs

David Wood: is there a difference between librarys or APIs ←

15:42:54 <JeremyCarroll> Sandro: no

Sandro Hawke: no ←

15:43:07 <davidwood> ack JeremyCarroll

David Wood: ack JeremyCarroll ←

15:43:16 <webr3> ww, why does it flip between qnames/curies and simple keys? (type / "dc:isPartOf")

Nathan Rixham: ww, why does it flip between qnames/curies and simple keys? (type / "dc:isPartOf") ←

15:43:20 <JeremyCarroll> Zakim, unmute JeremyCarroll

Zakim, unmute JeremyCarroll ←

15:43:20 <Zakim> JeremyCarroll should no longer be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: JeremyCarroll should no longer be muted ←

15:44:29 <ww> webr3: the algorithm is, is there a property on the python object that is explicitly modelled and we know a priori in an application-specific way what predicate it is? then just use the property name

Nathan Rixham: the algorithm is, is there a property on the python object that is explicitly modelled and we know a priori in an application-specific way what predicate it is? then just use the property name [ Scribe Assist by William Waites ] ←

15:44:44 <ww> 2. do we have a known prefix we can use? use that (e.g. curie)

William Waites: 2. do we have a known prefix we can use? use that (e.g. curie) ←

15:44:51 <ww> 3. use <uri>

William Waites: 3. use <uri> ←

15:45:18 <webr3> ww, do you see (2) as being important or would 1+3 be acceptable?

Nathan Rixham: ww, do you see (2) as being important or would 1+3 be acceptable? ←

15:46:13 <JeremyCarroll> Zakim, mute JeremyCarroll

Zakim, mute JeremyCarroll ←

15:46:13 <Zakim> JeremyCarroll should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: JeremyCarroll should now be muted ←

15:46:15 <davidwood> ack manu1

David Wood: ack manu1 ←

15:46:15 <Zakim> manu1, you wanted to discuss really simple encoding.

Zakim IRC Bot: manu1, you wanted to discuss really simple encoding. ←

15:46:55 <JeremyCarroll> Jeremy: in TQ's client server protocol, issues to do with client side caching and temporal semantics - to make it neutral to programmer as to whether a triple is locally cached or involves server round trip

Jeremy Carroll: in TQ's client server protocol, issues to do with client side caching and temporal semantics - to make it neutral to programmer as to whether a triple is locally cached or involves server round trip ←

15:47:12 <ww> webr3: let's follow up on the list

Nathan Rixham: let's follow up on the list [ Scribe Assist by William Waites ] ←

15:48:02 <AndyS> q+

Andy Seaborne: q+ ←

15:48:18 <davidwood> ack AndyS

David Wood: ack AndyS ←

15:48:22 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: of the people represented here, there do not seem to be actual business requirements

Manu Sporny: of the people represented here, there do not seem to be actual business requirements ←

15:48:45 <webr3> likewise, I have business use-cases for a few clients

Nathan Rixham: likewise, I have business use-cases for a few clients ←

15:49:21 <tomayac> (dialed in the us bridge. redialing. we had the same issue in the media fragments wg this morning)

Thomas Steiner: (dialed in the us bridge. redialing. we had the same issue in the media fragments wg this morning) ←

15:49:26 <Zakim> -tomayac_

Zakim IRC Bot: -tomayac_ ←

15:50:14 <Zakim> +tomayac_

Zakim IRC Bot: +tomayac_ ←

15:51:45 <tomayac> (to ivan lol, don't have a prob w/ manu neither ;-) only hearing him)

Thomas Steiner: (to ivan lol, don't have a prob w/ manu neither ;-) only hearing him) ←

15:51:52 <davidwood> ack sandro

David Wood: ack sandro ←

15:52:25 <webr3> q+

Nathan Rixham: q+ ←

15:52:27 <JeremyCarroll> sandro: should we discuss use cases for rest of telecon?

Sandro Hawke: should we discuss use cases for rest of telecon? ←

15:52:38 <JeremyCarroll> david: do you want to categorize them?

David Wood: do you want to categorize them? ←

15:52:43 <JeremyCarroll> sandro: only if easy

Sandro Hawke: only if easy ←

15:52:48 <Zakim> +AZ

Zakim IRC Bot: +AZ ←

15:53:07 <manu1> zakim, mute AZ

Manu Sporny: zakim, mute AZ ←

15:53:07 <Zakim> AZ should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: AZ should now be muted ←

15:53:12 <sandro> zakim, who is on the call?

Sandro Hawke: zakim, who is on the call? ←

15:53:12 <Zakim> On the phone I see Tony, David, Sandro, LeeF, zwu2 (muted), JeremyCarroll (muted), AndyS, mischat_ (muted), manu1, AlexHall, PatH, JFB (muted), Ivan (muted), FabGandon, cygri,

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Tony, David, Sandro, LeeF, zwu2 (muted), JeremyCarroll (muted), AndyS, mischat_ (muted), manu1, AlexHall, PatH, JFB (muted), Ivan (muted), FabGandon, cygri, ←

15:53:16 <Zakim> ... Souri_, Peter_Patel-Schneider, webr3, ww (muted), ww, OlivierCorby, tomayac_, AZ (muted)

Zakim IRC Bot: ... Souri_, Peter_Patel-Schneider, webr3, ww (muted), ww, OlivierCorby, tomayac_, AZ (muted) ←

15:53:23 <AZ> Zakim, mute me

Antoine Zimmermann: Zakim, mute me ←

15:53:23 <Zakim> sorry, AZ, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you

Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, AZ, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you ←

15:53:24 <webr3> q-

Nathan Rixham: q- ←

15:53:52 <Zakim> +AxelPolleres

Zakim IRC Bot: +AxelPolleres ←

15:53:52 <webr3> q+

Nathan Rixham: q+ ←

15:53:59 <cygri> q+

Richard Cyganiak: q+ ←

15:54:05 <ivan> ack webr3

Ivan Herman: ack webr3 ←

15:54:05 <davidwood> ack web3r

David Wood: ack web3r ←

15:54:15 <sandro> sandro: please queue yourself to talk about the json use case you care about the most

Sandro Hawke: please queue yourself to talk about the json use case you care about the most [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

15:54:52 <ww> q+

William Waites: q+ ←

15:56:08 <JeremyCarroll> Nathan: first case was that they wanted tripled based data to be exposed as simple objects without RDF

Nathan Rixham: first case was that they wanted tripled based data to be exposed as simple objects without RDF ←

15:55:36 <JeremyCarroll> Nathan: second case, people who have simple non-RDF objects in NoSQL db but they want to expose these as RDF

Nathan Rixham: second case, people who have simple non-RDF objects in NoSQL db but they want to expose these as RDF ←

15:56:38 <JeremyCarroll> Zakim, unmute JeremyCarroll

Zakim, unmute JeremyCarroll ←

15:56:38 <Zakim> JeremyCarroll should no longer be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: JeremyCarroll should no longer be muted ←

15:56:39 <mischat> zakim, who is making noise ?

Mischa Tuffield: zakim, who is making noise ? ←

15:56:49 <Zakim> mischat, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: David (56%), tomayac_ (8%), AndyS (19%), JeremyCarroll (34%), webr3 (48%), ww (4%)

Zakim IRC Bot: mischat, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: David (56%), tomayac_ (8%), AndyS (19%), JeremyCarroll (34%), webr3 (48%), ww (4%) ←

15:56:55 <JeremyCarroll> Zakim, mute JeremyCarroll

Zakim, mute JeremyCarroll ←

15:56:55 <Zakim> JeremyCarroll should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: JeremyCarroll should now be muted ←

15:57:05 <davidwood> ack manu1

David Wood: ack manu1 ←

15:57:19 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: we are working on universal payment standard

Manu Sporny: we are working on universal payment standard ←

15:58:06 <mischat> http://payswarm.com/

Mischa Tuffield: http://payswarm.com/ ←

15:58:25 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: want a decentralized system that avoids reentering of financial data

Manu Sporny: want a decentralized system that avoids reentering of financial data ←

15:58:36 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: core technology is RDFa in HTML

Manu Sporny: core technology is RDFa in HTML ←

15:58:54 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: data is stored either in triple store or document store

Manu Sporny: data is stored either in triple store or document store ←

15:59:08 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: assumption is HTML+RDFa not a triple store

Manu Sporny: assumption is HTML+RDFa not a triple store ←

15:59:45 <ivan> q+

Ivan Herman: q+ ←

15:59:45 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: lots of URIs for identifying thins

Manu Sporny: lots of URIs for identifying thins ←

16:00:05 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: need someway to express data which web developers are comfortable with

Manu Sporny: need someway to express data which web developers are comfortable with ←

16:00:21 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: turtle etc are way outside comfort zone of developers discussed

Manu Sporny: turtle etc are way outside comfort zone of developers discussed ←

16:00:36 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: needs to be as easy as twitter or facebook API

Manu Sporny: needs to be as easy as twitter or facebook API ←

16:00:48 <ivan> q-

Ivan Herman: q- ←

16:00:52 <Zakim> -OlivierCorby

Zakim IRC Bot: -OlivierCorby ←

16:00:54 <JeremyCarroll> Manu: API can be converted into triples, but can be used directly

Manu Sporny: API can be converted into triples, but can be used directly ←

16:00:58 <sandro> manu: We want to provide an API where people who care about triples can get them, but others can use the API directly, where it just looks like json.

Manu Sporny: We want to provide an API where people who care about triples can get them, but others can use the API directly, where it just looks like json. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:01:16 <zwu2> q+

Zhe Wu: q+ ←

16:01:21 <davidwood> ack cygri

David Wood: ack cygri ←

16:01:23 <sandro> (very clear at the end, Manu, thanks.)

Sandro Hawke: (very clear at the end, Manu, thanks.) ←

16:01:40 <JeremyCarroll> Richard: we have RDF data in a SPARQL store

Richard Cyganiak: we have RDF data in a SPARQL store ←

16:01:51 <Zakim> +OlivierCorby

Zakim IRC Bot: +OlivierCorby ←

16:01:53 <JeremyCarroll> Richard: we want to build one or more apps that use this data

Richard Cyganiak: we want to build one or more apps that use this data ←

16:01:58 <zwu2> zakim, unmute me

Zhe Wu: zakim, unmute me ←

16:01:58 <Zakim> zwu2 should no longer be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: zwu2 should no longer be muted ←

16:02:18 <JeremyCarroll> Richard: we want to develop these apps in JavaScript because it makes development process simpler

Richard Cyganiak: we want to develop these apps in JavaScript because it makes development process simpler ←

16:02:50 <JeremyCarroll> Richard: we currently do simple select queries with JSON results format from SPARQL

Richard Cyganiak: we currently do simple select queries with JSON results format from SPARQL ←

16:03:05 <JeremyCarroll> Richard: processing this is straightforward

Richard Cyganiak: processing this is straightforward ←

16:04:01 <ivan> zakim, who is noisy?

Ivan Herman: zakim, who is noisy? ←

16:04:11 <Zakim> ivan, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: 24 (28%), David (44%), tomayac_ (26%), manu1 (5%), cygri (20%), ww (5%)

Zakim IRC Bot: ivan, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: 24 (28%), David (44%), tomayac_ (26%), manu1 (5%), cygri (20%), ww (5%) ←

16:04:42 <sandro> cygri:We want something the encodes the output of SPARQL CONSTRUCT or DESCRIBE in a simple and predictable way for the Javascript developer who is already familiar with RDF.  They know SPARQL and can think in triples.

Richard Cyganiak: We want something the encodes the output of SPARQL CONSTRUCT or DESCRIBE in a simple and predictable way for the Javascript developer who is already familiar with RDF. They know SPARQL and can think in triples. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:05:21 <webr3> Nathan: I have two distinct groups of publishers (1) those who have rdf-triples behind the scenes (2) those who have non-rdf objects behind the scenes | both of those groups want to target both non-rdf developers, and rdf-developers. This creates two core needs: (a) a way to give rdf-triples as simple-objects to non-rdf developers (b) a way to give simple-objects as rdf to rdf-developers

Nathan Rixham: I have two distinct groups of publishers (1) those who have rdf-triples behind the scenes (2) those who have non-rdf objects behind the scenes | both of those groups want to target both non-rdf developers, and rdf-developers. This creates two core needs: (a) a way to give rdf-triples as simple-objects to non-rdf developers (b) a way to give simple-objects as rdf to rdf-developers [ Scribe Assist by Nathan Rixham ] ←

16:05:22 <webr3> Nathan: distinct from that I see two other cases (c) dumping rdf as json as a leightweight triple format (d) sparql (which I see as orthogonal, is sparql engine on client or server?)

Nathan Rixham: distinct from that I see two other cases (c) dumping rdf as json as a leightweight triple format (d) sparql (which I see as orthogonal, is sparql engine on client or server?) [ Scribe Assist by Nathan Rixham ] ←

16:05:26 <JeremyCarroll> Richard: but we also want to use things like DESCRIBE or CONSTRUCT

Richard Cyganiak: but we also want to use things like DESCRIBE or CONSTRUCT ←

16:05:26 <JeremyCarroll> Richard: but these do not give a JSON result

Richard Cyganiak: but these do not give a JSON result ←

16:05:35 <sandro> cygri: This is most interesting if you don't really want to use a consumer library; if library is okay, then use existing syntax.   It's nice to just code away on the raw json, though.

Richard Cyganiak: This is most interesting if you don't really want to use a consumer library; if library is okay, then use existing syntax. It's nice to just code away on the raw json, though. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:05:55 <JeremyCarroll> Zakim, mute JeremyCarroll

Zakim, mute JeremyCarroll ←

16:05:55 <JeremyCarroll> Richard: want simple or predictable result format for DESCRIBE and CONSTRUCT

Richard Cyganiak: want simple or predictable result format for DESCRIBE and CONSTRUCT ←

16:05:55 <JeremyCarroll> Richard: we don't really want a library, because if library is OK then there is no problem to sovle (library can do whatever magic is needed)

Richard Cyganiak: we don't really want a library, because if library is OK then there is no problem to sovle (library can do whatever magic is needed) ←

16:05:55 <Zakim> JeremyCarroll was already muted, JeremyCarroll

Zakim IRC Bot: JeremyCarroll was already muted, JeremyCarroll ←

16:06:09 <ivan> The requirements of Manu and Richard are not very dissimilar...

Ivan Herman: The requirements of Manu and Richard are not very dissimilar... ←

16:06:19 <davidwood> JeremyCarroll, no it wasn't you

David Wood: JeremyCarroll, no it wasn't you ←

16:06:32 <JeremyCarroll> Richard: related problem is posting data back to SPARQL store

Richard Cyganiak: related problem is posting data back to SPARQL store ←

16:06:35 <manu1> I wouldn't say that Ivan - not clear at the moment...

Manu Sporny: I wouldn't say that Ivan - not clear at the moment... ←

16:06:36 <JeremyCarroll> e.g. with HTTP PUT

e.g. with HTTP PUT ←

16:06:37 <sandro> cygri: also, good to post back to store.   json serialization for simple encoding of RDF graph.

Richard Cyganiak: also, good to post back to store. json serialization for simple encoding of RDF graph. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:06:40 <davidwood> q?

David Wood: q? ←

16:06:52 <ww> zakim, unmute me

William Waites: zakim, unmute me ←

16:06:52 <Zakim> ww should no longer be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: ww should no longer be muted ←

16:07:03 <sandro> (great, cygri)

Sandro Hawke: (great, cygri) ←

16:07:06 <davidwood> ack ww

David Wood: ack ww ←

16:07:17 <PatHayes> yup

Patrick Hayes: yup ←

16:07:23 <Zakim> -LeeF

Zakim IRC Bot: -LeeF ←

16:08:43 <JeremyCarroll> ww: has use cases with end users in web browswers annotating data

William Waites: has use cases with end users in web browswers annotating data ←

16:08:56 <JeremyCarroll> ww: the end users actions are mediated by web developers

William Waites: the end users actions are mediated by web developers ←

16:09:07 <JeremyCarroll> ww: the web developers neither know nor want to know about RDF

William Waites: the web developers neither know nor want to know about RDF ←

16:09:32 <JeremyCarroll> ww: but these developers need to mediate between a triple store and the end users

William Waites: but these developers need to mediate between a triple store and the end users ←

16:09:40 <sandro> ww: The developers don't seem to know much about modeling in RDF, and don't want to, but the modeling in the back is RDF.

William Waites: The developers don't seem to know much about modeling in RDF, and don't want to, but the modeling in the back is RDF. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:09:57 <ww> zakim, mute me

William Waites: zakim, mute me ←

16:09:57 <Zakim> ww should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: ww should now be muted ←

16:09:59 <JeremyCarroll> ww: mechanisms involve HTTP PUT/POST/GET and JSON but not sure how

William Waites: mechanisms involve HTTP PUT/POST/GET and JSON but not sure how ←

16:10:06 <davidwood> ack zwu

David Wood: ack zwu ←

16:10:10 <manu1> People might want to look at this as a complex example: http://purl.org/payswarm#Contract

Manu Sporny: People might want to look at this as a complex example: http://purl.org/payswarm#Contract ←

16:10:39 <JeremyCarroll> zwu: I understand why web developers do not want RDF/XML, but why not turtle

Zhe Wu: I understand why web developers do not want RDF/XML, but why not turtle ←

16:10:39 <sandro> zwu2: Why would developers really not want to get near Turtle.  It's really simple.

Zhe Wu: Why would developers really not want to get near Turtle. It's really simple. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:10:51 <davidwood> It may interest some to see how James Leigh and I roundtrip RDF to and from a browser:  http://callimachusproject.org

David Wood: It may interest some to see how James Leigh and I roundtrip RDF to and from a browser: http://callimachusproject.org ←

16:10:57 <sandro> manu: They say they already know json, and don't see why they need something else.

Manu Sporny: They say they already know json, and don't see why they need something else. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:10:57 <JeremyCarroll> manu: dev say we already know JSON, why should we learn more?

Manu Sporny: dev say we already know JSON, why should we learn more? ←

16:11:17 <sandro> manu: They just don't see the problem that json doesn't address.

Manu Sporny: They just don't see the problem that json doesn't address. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:11:32 <JeremyCarroll> manu: web developers use json to read and write data and accomplish their tasks involving linked data like tasks

Manu Sporny: web developers use json to read and write data and accomplish their tasks involving linked data like tasks ←

16:11:49 <ww> somewhat harshly, i've been told that it is not reasonable to expect developers to "go back to school" and learn about something new, and rdf seems pretty different

William Waites: somewhat harshly, i've been told that it is not reasonable to expect developers to "go back to school" and learn about something new, and rdf seems pretty different ←

16:11:58 <sandro> manu: and you don't need much more.      you just uris, and folks already do that a lot.    most of that can be done on the server side.    "Why are you making me learn something new, when that's not really required."

Manu Sporny: and you don't need much more. you just uris, and folks already do that a lot. most of that can be done on the server side. "Why are you making me learn something new, when that's not really required." [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:12:02 <JeremyCarroll> manu: why are you making me learn something new ...

Manu Sporny: why are you making me learn something new ... ←

16:12:24 <cygri> q+

Richard Cyganiak: q+ ←

16:12:35 <JeremyCarroll> zwu: RDF is not a huge deal

Zhe Wu: RDF is not a huge deal ←

16:12:41 <cygri> q-

Richard Cyganiak: q- ←

16:12:43 <JeremyCarroll> manu: but the learning curves are huge

Manu Sporny: but the learning curves are huge ←

16:12:49 <JeremyCarroll> JeremyCarroll: +1 to manu

Jeremy Carroll: +1 to manu ←

16:12:59 <ivan> +1 to manu

Ivan Herman: +1 to manu ←

16:13:01 <cygri> +10 to manu

Richard Cyganiak: +10 to manu ←

16:13:09 <ww> +100 to manu

William Waites: +100 to manu ←

16:13:14 <JeremyCarroll> David: agrees with manu

David Wood: agrees with manu ←

16:13:17 <mischat> fwiw we built the whole of  http://foafbuilder.qdos.com/builder/ which is very ajaxie, or "ajar-ie" in timbl speak. Our model in the MVC was RDF, storage a triplestore. and like above RDF to and from a browser

Mischa Tuffield: fwiw we built the whole of http://foafbuilder.qdos.com/builder/ which is very ajaxie, or "ajar-ie" in timbl speak. Our model in the MVC was RDF, storage a triplestore. and like above RDF to and from a browser ←

16:13:23 <webr3> they have a full stack including progamming languages all setup around working with classes and objects - they just aren't setup to handle triples and graphs (who is??!)

Nathan Rixham: they have a full stack including progamming languages all setup around working with classes and objects - they just aren't setup to handle triples and graphs (who is??!) ←

16:13:29 <sandro> manu: The RDF concepts are really not something that are easy to pick up and learn.

Manu Sporny: The RDF concepts are really not something that are easy to pick up and learn. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:13:32 <JeremyCarroll>  strong agreement with manu

strong agreement with manu ←

16:13:36 <manu1> +1 to David

Manu Sporny: +1 to David ←

16:13:40 <ivan> +1 to David

Ivan Herman: +1 to David ←

16:13:52 <JeremyCarroll> David: we want web developers to use this technology, rather than web dev want to use these

David Wood: we want web developers to use this technology, rather than web dev want to use these ←

16:13:52 <cygri> food for thought: http://www.google.com/trends?q=json%2Crdf&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0

Richard Cyganiak: food for thought: http://www.google.com/trends?q=json%2Crdf&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0 ←

16:13:55 <sandro> davidwood: We want web developers to adopt this technology, more than they want to adopt it.   We can't put stumbling blocks in their way.

David Wood: We want web developers to adopt this technology, more than they want to adopt it. We can't put stumbling blocks in their way. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:14:09 <JeremyCarroll> q+

q+ ←

16:14:12 <ivan> zhe, do not underestimate the weight of a familiar syntax

Ivan Herman: zhe, do not underestimate the weight of a familiar syntax ←

16:14:26 <davidwood> cygri: very relevant!

Richard Cyganiak: very relevant! [ Scribe Assist by David Wood ] ←

16:14:34 <AndyS> q+ to talk to linking

Andy Seaborne: q+ to talk to linking ←

16:14:52 <JeremyCarroll> manu: I don't think web developers grok some of the advanced topics to do with linked data

Manu Sporny: I don't think web developers grok some of the advanced topics to do with linked data ←

16:15:03 <JeremyCarroll> Zakim, unmute JeremyCarroll

Zakim, unmute JeremyCarroll ←

16:15:03 <Zakim> JeremyCarroll should no longer be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: JeremyCarroll should no longer be muted ←

16:15:03 <zwu2> zakim, unmute me

Zhe Wu: zakim, unmute me ←

16:15:04 <Zakim> zwu2 was not muted, zwu2

Zakim IRC Bot: zwu2 was not muted, zwu2 ←

16:16:04 <ww> uri as a global *property/predicate* identifier is difficult - you can't write that in most OO type languages

William Waites: uri as a global *property/predicate* identifier is difficult - you can't write that in most OO type languages ←

16:16:06 <pfps> isn't JSON at least formally "open"

Peter Patel-Schneider: isn't JSON at least formally "open" ←

16:16:34 <JeremyCarroll> Jeremy: uri as global identifier as opposed to local scoped id is one key RDF concept

Jeremy Carroll: uri as global identifier as opposed to local scoped id is one key RDF concept ←

16:16:55 <JeremyCarroll> Jeremy: open schema of RDFS rather than fully specified app schema is a second

Jeremy Carroll: open schema of RDFS rather than fully specified app schema is a second ←

16:17:04 <JeremyCarroll> Jeremy: both are advanced and difficult

Jeremy Carroll: both are advanced and difficult ←

16:16:11 <manu1> +1 to Jeremy

Manu Sporny: +1 to Jeremy ←

16:16:12 <JeremyCarroll> Zakim, mute JeremyCarroll

Zakim, mute JeremyCarroll ←

16:16:12 <Zakim> JeremyCarroll should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: JeremyCarroll should now be muted ←

16:16:23 <AndyS> AndyS supports cygri example (roughly)

Andy Seaborne: AndyS supports cygri example (roughly) ←

16:16:48 <sandro> cygri, http://www.google.com/trends?q=data%2C+love&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=1

Sandro Hawke: cygri, http://www.google.com/trends?q=data%2C+love&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=1 ←

16:17:14 <mischat> I thought we are supposed to be standardising common practices ....

Mischa Tuffield: I thought we are supposed to be standardising common practices .... ←

16:17:17 <PatHayes> The other frightening thing about RDF is, if one probes the 'buzz' for insight, one finds a lot of worry and confusion and debate and so on, rather than a bunch of nice easy tutorials.

Patrick Hayes: The other frightening thing about RDF is, if one probes the 'buzz' for insight, one finds a lot of worry and confusion and debate and so on, rather than a bunch of nice easy tutorials. ←

16:17:38 <sandro> indeed, PatHayes, it's not a pretty picture.

Sandro Hawke: indeed, PatHayes, it's not a pretty picture. ←

16:17:44 <AndyS> We did not finish JSON UCs

Andy Seaborne: We did not finish JSON UCs ←

16:17:56 <PatHayes> So maybe we should make it our business to paint some better pictures :-)

Patrick Hayes: So maybe we should make it our business to paint some better pictures :-) ←

16:17:59 <zwu2> bye

Zhe Wu: bye ←

16:17:59 <Zakim> -cygri

Zakim IRC Bot: -cygri ←

16:18:00 <Zakim> -Souri_

Zakim IRC Bot: -Souri_ ←

16:18:00 <Zakim> -AxelPolleres

Zakim IRC Bot: -AxelPolleres ←

16:18:01 <Zakim> -ww

Zakim IRC Bot: -ww ←

16:18:01 <Zakim> -tomayac_

Zakim IRC Bot: -tomayac_ ←

16:18:02 <Zakim> -manu1

Zakim IRC Bot: -manu1 ←

16:18:02 <Zakim> -Tony

Scribe problem: the name 'Tony' does not match any of the 41 active names. Either change the name used, or request the list of names be altered.Active names: Alex Hall Andy Seaborne Antoine Zimmermann Axel Polleres Christopher Matheus Dan Brickley David Wood Dickson Lukose Dieter Fensel Eric Prud'hommeaux Fabien Gandon Gavin Carothers Guus Schreiber Ivan Herman Jean-François Baget Jeremy Carroll Kiu Ching Chieh Lee Feigenbaum Manu Sporny Matteo Brunati Michael Hausenblas Mischa Tuffield Mohamed ZERGAOUI Nathan Rixham Nicholas Humfrey Olivier Corby Patrick Hayes Peter Patel-Schneider Pierre-Antoine Champin Richard Cyganiak Sandro Hawke Scott Bauer Souripriya Das Steve Harris Thomas Steiner William Waites Yves Raimond Zhe Wu Zakim IRC Bot Trackbot IRC Bot RRSAgent IRC Bot

Zakim IRC Bot: -Tony ←

16:18:03 <ivan> zakim, drop me

Ivan Herman: zakim, drop me ←

16:18:04 <Zakim> Ivan is being disconnected

Zakim IRC Bot: Ivan is being disconnected ←

16:18:06 <Zakim> -mischat_

Zakim IRC Bot: -mischat_ ←

16:18:08 <Zakim> -Ivan

Zakim IRC Bot: -Ivan ←

16:18:10 <Zakim> -OlivierCorby

Zakim IRC Bot: -OlivierCorby ←

16:18:12 <Zakim> -zwu2

Zakim IRC Bot: -zwu2 ←

16:18:14 <Zakim> -Sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro ←

16:18:16 <Zakim> -AlexHall

Zakim IRC Bot: -AlexHall ←

16:18:18 <Zakim> -webr3

Zakim IRC Bot: -webr3 ←

16:18:19 <Zakim> -David

Zakim IRC Bot: -David ←

16:18:22 <Zakim> -Peter_Patel-Schneider

Zakim IRC Bot: -Peter_Patel-Schneider ←

16:18:22 <JeremyCarroll> yes

yes ←

16:18:22 <JeremyCarroll> Zakim, unmute JeremyCarroll

Zakim, unmute JeremyCarroll ←

16:18:24 <Zakim> -PatH

Zakim IRC Bot: -PatH ←

16:18:26 <Zakim> -AZ

Zakim IRC Bot: -AZ ←

16:18:28 <Zakim> -AndyS

Zakim IRC Bot: -AndyS ←

16:18:30 <Zakim> JeremyCarroll should no longer be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: JeremyCarroll should no longer be muted ←

16:18:34 <sandro> Zakim, list attendees

Sandro Hawke: Zakim, list attendees ←

16:18:36 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been Tony, David, Sandro, LeeF, OlivierCorby, +1.415.369.aabb, JeremyCarroll, AndyS, manu1, mischat_, tomayac_, PatH, Ivan, JFB, zwu2,

Zakim IRC Bot: As of this point the attendees have been Tony, David, Sandro, LeeF, OlivierCorby, +1.415.369.aabb, JeremyCarroll, AndyS, manu1, mischat_, tomayac_, PatH, Ivan, JFB, zwu2, ←

16:18:39 <Zakim> ... FabGandon, +1.603.897.aaee, cygri, Peter_Patel-Schneider, AlexHall, webr3, Souri_, ww, AZ, AxelPolleres

Zakim IRC Bot: ... FabGandon, +1.603.897.aaee, cygri, Peter_Patel-Schneider, AlexHall, webr3, Souri_, ww, AZ, AxelPolleres ←

16:18:43 <Zakim> -JeremyCarroll

Zakim IRC Bot: -JeremyCarroll ←

16:18:51 <Zakim> -FabGandon

Zakim IRC Bot: -FabGandon ←

16:19:41 <Zakim> -JFB

Zakim IRC Bot: -JFB ←

16:19:46 <JeremyCarroll> Gavin will scribe next week

Gavin will scribe next week ←

16:19:46 <JeremyCarroll> meeting adjourned

meeting adjourned ←

16:19:58 <davidwood> Thanks, Jeremy!

David Wood: Thanks, Jeremy! ←

16:20:05 <JeremyCarroll> rssagent, draft minutes

rssagent, draft minutes ←

16:20:30 <JeremyCarroll> rrsagent, draft minutes

rrsagent, draft minutes ←

16:20:30 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/23-rdf-wg-minutes.html JeremyCarroll

RRSAgent IRC Bot: I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/23-rdf-wg-minutes.html JeremyCarroll ←



Formatted by CommonScribe