13:56:04 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/09/23-ldp-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/09/23-ldp-irc ←
13:56:06 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs public ←
13:56:08 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be LDP
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be LDP ←
13:56:08 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_LDP()10:00AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_LDP()10:00AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes ←
13:56:09 <trackbot> Meeting: Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Teleconference
13:56:09 <trackbot> Date: 23 September 2013
13:57:34 <Arnaud> Arnaud has changed the topic to: LDP WG: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp - Today's agenda: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.09.23
Arnaud Le Hors: Arnaud has changed the topic to: LDP WG: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp - Today's agenda: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.09.23 ←
13:59:24 <Zakim> SW_LDP()10:00AM has now started
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_LDP()10:00AM has now started ←
13:59:26 <Zakim> + +1.661.748.aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.661.748.aaaa ←
13:59:34 <Zakim> - +1.661.748.aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: - +1.661.748.aaaa ←
13:59:37 <Zakim> SW_LDP()10:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_LDP()10:00AM has ended ←
13:59:37 <Zakim> Attendees were +1.661.748.aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were +1.661.748.aaaa ←
13:59:55 <Zakim> SW_LDP()10:00AM has now started
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_LDP()10:00AM has now started ←
13:59:56 <Zakim> +Arnaud
Zakim IRC Bot: +Arnaud ←
14:00:14 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:00:16 <Zakim> -[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: -[IPcaller] ←
14:00:16 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:00:21 <cody> Zakim, IPcaller is me
Cody Burleson: Zakim, IPcaller is me ←
14:00:21 <Zakim> +cody; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +cody; got it ←
14:01:28 <Zakim> + +1.919.306.aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.919.306.aaaa ←
14:02:30 <Zakim> +Ashok_Malhotra
Zakim IRC Bot: +Ashok_Malhotra ←
14:02:38 <Zakim> +??P12
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P12 ←
14:03:10 <stevebattle5> zakim, ?P12 is me
Steve Battle: zakim, ?P12 is me ←
14:03:10 <Zakim> sorry, stevebattle5, I do not recognize a party named '?P12'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, stevebattle5, I do not recognize a party named '?P12' ←
14:03:23 <stevebattle5> zakim, p12 is me
Steve Battle: zakim, p12 is me ←
14:03:23 <Zakim> sorry, stevebattle5, I do not recognize a party named 'p12'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, stevebattle5, I do not recognize a party named 'p12' ←
14:03:38 <stevebattle5> zakim, P12 is me
Steve Battle: zakim, P12 is me ←
14:03:38 <Zakim> sorry, stevebattle5, I do not recognize a party named 'P12'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, stevebattle5, I do not recognize a party named 'P12' ←
14:04:11 <stevebattle5> zakim, ??P12 is me
Steve Battle: zakim, ??P12 is me ←
14:04:11 <Zakim> +stevebattle5; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +stevebattle5; got it ←
14:05:04 <Arnaud> zakim, who's on the phone?
Arnaud Le Hors: zakim, who's on the phone? ←
14:05:04 <Zakim> On the phone I see Arnaud, cody, +1.919.306.aaaa, Ashok_Malhotra, stevebattle5
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Arnaud, cody, +1.919.306.aaaa, Ashok_Malhotra, stevebattle5 ←
14:05:10 <bblfish> hi
Henry Story: hi ←
14:05:46 <Zakim> +OpenLink_Software
Zakim IRC Bot: +OpenLink_Software ←
14:05:53 <Arnaud> zakim, aaaa is SteveS
Arnaud Le Hors: zakim, aaaa is SteveS ←
14:05:54 <Zakim> +SteveS; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +SteveS; got it ←
14:05:54 <TallTed> Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me ←
14:05:55 <Zakim> +TallTed; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +TallTed; got it ←
14:05:55 <TallTed> Zakim, mute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, mute me ←
14:05:57 <Zakim> TallTed should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: TallTed should now be muted ←
14:06:05 <Arnaud> zakim, who's on the phone?
Arnaud Le Hors: zakim, who's on the phone? ←
14:06:06 <Zakim> On the phone I see Arnaud, cody, SteveS, Ashok_Malhotra, stevebattle5, TallTed (muted)
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Arnaud, cody, SteveS, Ashok_Malhotra, stevebattle5, TallTed (muted) ←
14:07:15 <Zakim> +JohnArwe
Zakim IRC Bot: +JohnArwe ←
14:08:05 <Ashok> scribe: Ashok
(Scribe set to Ashok Malhotra)
<Ashok> chair: Arnaud
<Ashok> agenda: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.09.23
<Ashok> topic: Admin
14:08:58 <Ashok> subTopic: Approve minutes from Aug 26, Sep 3, and Sep 12-13?
14:09:16 <Zakim> +bblfish
Zakim IRC Bot: +bblfish ←
<Ashok> http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2013-08-26
http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2013-08-26 ←
<Ashok> http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2013-09-03
http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2013-09-03 ←
<Ashok> http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2013-09-12
http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2013-09-12 ←
<Ashok> http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2013-09-13
http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2013-09-13 ←
14:09:59 <Ashok> SteveS: I looked at minutes closely
Steve Speicher: I looked at minutes closely ←
14:10:14 <Ashok> No objection to approving minutes
No objection to approving minutes ←
<Ashok> Resolved: Minutes of Aug 26, Sep 3, and Sep 12-13 approved.
RESOLVED: Minutes of Aug 26, Sep 3, and Sep 12-13 approved. ←
<Ashok> subTopic: Next meeting
<Ashok> Arnaud: September 30, same time, same place.
Arnaud Le Hors: September 30, same time, same place. ←
14:10:29 <Ashok> Topic: Tracking of Action Items & Issues
14:11:26 <Ashok> steves: Action-93 can be closed
Steve Speicher: ACTION-93 can be closed ←
14:11:26 <trackbot> Error finding '93'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/users>.
Trackbot IRC Bot: Error finding '93'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/users>. ←
<Ashok> Resolved: Close Action-93
14:13:51 <Ashok> SteveS will respond to TimBL
SteveS will respond to TimBL ←
14:12:09 <Ashok> Action-98: Inlining
14:12:09 <trackbot> Notes added to Action-98 Removing "inlining" from spec, per resolution http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2013-09-12#resolution_2.
Trackbot IRC Bot: Notes added to ACTION-98 Removing "inlining" from spec, per resolution http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2013-09-12#resolution_2. ←
14:14:03 <Ashok> Resolved: Close Action-98
14:12:12 <Zakim> +??P33
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P33 ←
14:12:22 <BartvanLeeuwen> Zakim, ??P33 is me
Bart van Leeuwen: Zakim, ??P33 is me ←
14:12:22 <Zakim> +BartvanLeeuwen; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +BartvanLeeuwen; got it ←
14:13:00 <Zakim> +??P34
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P34 ←
14:13:24 <svillata> Zakim, ??P34 is me
Serena Villata: Zakim, ??P34 is me ←
14:13:24 <Zakim> +svillata; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +svillata; got it ←
14:13:52 <JohnArwe> EricP sent an email claiming completion of 97
John Arwe: EricP sent an email claiming completion of 97 ←
14:14:03 <trackbot> Closed Action-98.
Trackbot IRC Bot: Closed ACTION-98. ←
14:14:27 <Ashok> Arnaud: Close Action-97. Email from Eric
Arnaud Le Hors: Close ACTION-97. Email from Eric ←
<Ashok> Resolved: Close Action-97
14:15:38 <trackbot> ACTION-93 -- Steve Speicher to Investigate how to change the spec so that in case the server discards some of triples the client sent it informs the client -- due 2013-09-24 -- PENDINGREVIEW
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-93 -- Steve Speicher to Investigate how to change the spec so that in case the server discards some of triples the client sent it informs the client -- due 2013-09-24 -- PENDINGREVIEW ←
14:15:38 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/93
Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/93 ←
<ashok> topic: Proposals for PUT ignoring triples ACTION-93
14:16:07 <Ashok> SteveS: I didn't change 4.5.1
Steve Speicher: I didn't change 4.5.1 ←
14:16:47 <Ashok> ... added wording that additional details may be provided
... added wording that additional details may be provided ←
14:18:42 <JohnArwe> email with proposal is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Sep/0051.html
John Arwe: email with proposal is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Sep/0051.html ←
14:18:51 <Ashok> ... 4.5.4 ... more info may be given re. the triples the server will accept
... 4.5.4 ... more info may be given re. the triples the server will accept ←
14:19:38 <bblfish> q+
Henry Story: q+ ←
14:20:54 <Ashok> Discussion on rejecting triples
Discussion on rejecting triples ←
14:21:33 <Arnaud> ack bblfish
Arnaud Le Hors: ack bblfish ←
14:21:53 <cody> q+
Cody Burleson: q+ ←
14:22:07 <Ashok> ... do all triples get managed by client. In that case, LDP server has little utility
... do all triples get managed by client. In that case, LDP server has little utility ←
14:22:35 <Zakim> +Kalpa
Zakim IRC Bot: +Kalpa ←
14:22:36 <Ashok> Henry: Asks about server managed properties ...
Henry Story: Asks about server managed properties ... ←
14:22:38 <Arnaud> ack cody
Arnaud Le Hors: ack cody ←
14:24:27 <Ashok> ... which triples can server reject? What about triples not relevant to the application. Can server discard these?
... which triples can server reject? What about triples not relevant to the application. Can server discard these? ←
14:24:51 <JohnArwe> I'll just note here (for now - will email resp too) that proposed text appears to assume that both flavors of servers have the same constraints; not clear if that's intentional.
John Arwe: I'll just note here (for now - will email resp too) that proposed text appears to assume that both flavors of servers have the same constraints; not clear if that's intentional. ←
14:26:12 <Ashok> Do we say anywhere that triples the server does not recognize can be dropped?
Do we say anywhere that triples the server does not recognize can be dropped? ←
14:26:24 <JohnArwe> today we do
14:26:41 <JohnArwe> ...at least for put
John Arwe: ...at least for put ←
14:26:43 <Ashok> ... at least the server should tell what it will do
... at least the server should tell what it will do ←
14:27:27 <JohnArwe> "will do" (discoverable in advance) or "did" (after the fact) ... or both. what you are you suggesting is required?
John Arwe: "will do" (discoverable in advance) or "did" (after the fact) ... or both. what you are you suggesting is required? ←
14:28:11 <cody> 2 types of server: constrained versus unconstrained or domain-specific versus "vanilla" (non domain-specific).
Cody Burleson: 2 types of server: constrained versus unconstrained or domain-specific versus "vanilla" (non domain-specific). ←
14:28:11 <stevebattle5> q+
Steve Battle: q+ ←
14:28:17 <Arnaud> ack steveb
Arnaud Le Hors: ack steveb ←
14:28:21 <TallTed> I think LDP server MUST be allowed to not store a submission, but when it does so, it MUST notify the client somehow. easy to reject an entire submission (whether POST, PUT, or PATCH); harder to spec comms of why a submission is rejected; harder still to spec comms for a *partially* rejected submission.
Ted Thibodeau: I think LDP server MUST be allowed to not store a submission, but when it does so, it MUST notify the client somehow. easy to reject an entire submission (whether POST, PUT, or PATCH); harder to spec comms of why a submission is rejected; harder still to spec comms for a *partially* rejected submission. ←
14:29:14 <JohnArwe> +1 ted. also seems a touch odd that we call out these two cases for put only, vs post (create) and patch where they could also be modified.
John Arwe: +1 ted. also seems a touch odd that we call out these two cases for put only, vs post (create) and patch where they could also be modified. ←
14:29:26 <TallTed> Zakim, unmute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, unmute me ←
14:29:26 <Zakim> TallTed should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: TallTed should no longer be muted ←
14:29:44 <Ashok> SteveS: maybe we should say something stronger?
Steve Speicher: maybe we should say something stronger? ←
14:30:25 <bblfish> q+
Henry Story: q+ ←
14:30:29 <cody> Then I think the rejection message will need specification. The body of the response.
Cody Burleson: Then I think the rejection message will need specification. The body of the response. ←
14:30:35 <Ashok> Ted: Should be able to indicate which trioples were rejected
Ted Thibodeau: Should be able to indicate which trioples were rejected ←
14:30:37 <cody> We have to be very clear what was rejected.
Cody Burleson: We have to be very clear what was rejected. ←
14:30:50 <svillata> q?
Serena Villata: q? ←
14:31:00 <cody> Not just (oh, some things didn't make it); I would have to know precisely what.
Cody Burleson: Not just (oh, some things didn't make it); I would have to know precisely what. ←
14:31:26 <Arnaud> ack bblfish
Arnaud Le Hors: ack bblfish ←
14:32:08 <stevebattle5> q+
Steve Battle: q+ ←
14:32:21 <JohnArwe> the (spec) issue there cody is that, as tallted said, defining that "precisely what" is hard. if you also want the definition to be interoperable (which from context I suspect you do), then that would all become ldp work.
John Arwe: the (spec) issue there cody is that, as tallted said, defining that "precisely what" is hard. if you also want the definition to be interoperable (which from context I suspect you do), then that would all become ldp work. ←
14:32:50 <Ashok> Henry: Are we replacing the 208.5 with a warning?
Henry Story: Are we replacing the 208.5 with a warning? ←
14:33:47 <Arnaud> ack stevebattle5
Arnaud Le Hors: ack stevebattle5 ←
14:34:43 <Arnaud> ack steveb
Arnaud Le Hors: ack steveb ←
14:34:50 <Ashok> SteveB: Asks about deleting triples later
Steve Battle: Asks about deleting triples later ←
14:35:37 <bblfish> HTTP/1.1 204 No content
Henry Story: HTTP/1.1 204 No content ←
14:35:37 <bblfish> ETag: "ABC"
Henry Story: ETag: "ABC" ←
14:35:47 <Ashok> Henry: The Etag has changed, right? If you have some vocab you can explain rejection
Henry Story: The Etag has changed, right? If you have some vocab you can explain rejection ←
14:37:21 <Ashok> Ted: ETag does not give enough info
Ted Thibodeau: ETag does not give enough info ←
14:37:53 <Ashok> ... difference between change rejected or overwritten by other user
... difference between change rejected or overwritten by other user ←
14:39:10 <Ashok> Arnaud: Says "servers may inform the client" does that mean server still have option to fail silently
Arnaud Le Hors: Says "servers may inform the client" does that mean server still have option to fail silently ←
14:39:17 <JohnArwe> (from email) "4.5.1.1 LDPR servers MAY inform clients that some of the triples they provided were ignored ..."
John Arwe: (from email) "4.5.1.1 LDPR servers MAY inform clients that some of the triples they provided were ignored ..." ←
14:39:43 <Ashok> SteveS: Only for server-managed properties.
Steve Speicher: Only for server-managed properties. ←
14:40:11 <Ashok> Arnaud: Do we have a list of server-managed properties
Arnaud Le Hors: Do we have a list of server-managed properties ←
14:41:02 <stevebattle5> The proposal is going in the right direction though
Steve Battle: The proposal is going in the right direction though ←
14:41:16 <Ashok> Arnaud: Let's move on. Please reply to Steve's email and so we can make progess
Arnaud Le Hors: Let's move on. Please reply to Steve's email and so we can make progess ←
<ashok> topic: Proposal: change following to informative (re: redefining HTTP)
14:41:56 <Ashok> Mail from John Arwe responding to comment from Mark Baker saying we are redefining HTTP
Mail from John Arwe responding to comment from Mark Baker saying we are redefining HTTP ←
14:41:57 <JohnArwe> "change to informative" proposal email = http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Sep/0052.html
John Arwe: "change to informative" proposal email = http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Sep/0052.html ←
14:42:43 <Ashok> John: Any questions?
14:43:54 <Ashok> Arnaud: Please respond to John's mail
Arnaud Le Hors: Please respond to John's mail ←
14:45:09 <Ashok> topic: ISSUE-81 Confusing predicates
14:45:23 <bblfish> Issue-81?
14:45:23 <trackbot> Issue-81 -- Confusing membership* predicate names and other possible improvements -- open
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-81 -- Confusing membership* predicate names and other possible improvements -- open ←
14:45:23 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/81
Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/81 ←
14:45:29 <Ashok> Arnaud: David Wood summarized possible names
Arnaud Le Hors: David Wood summarized possible names ←
14:47:09 <bblfish> q+
Henry Story: q+ ←
14:48:22 <Ashok> Henry: Makes a proposal ...
Henry Story: Makes a proposal ... ←
14:49:24 <Ashok> Arnaud: Perhaps move proposals to Wiki page
Arnaud Le Hors: Perhaps move proposals to Wiki page ←
14:49:46 <Ashok> SteveS: I will do it
Steve Speicher: I will do it ←
14:50:06 <Arnaud> zakim, who's on the phone?
Arnaud Le Hors: zakim, who's on the phone? ←
14:50:06 <Zakim> On the phone I see Arnaud, cody, SteveS, Ashok_Malhotra, stevebattle5, TallTed, JohnArwe, bblfish, BartvanLeeuwen, svillata, Kalpa
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Arnaud, cody, SteveS, Ashok_Malhotra, stevebattle5, TallTed, JohnArwe, bblfish, BartvanLeeuwen, svillata, Kalpa ←
14:50:13 <Ashok> Arnaud: We will continue next week
Arnaud Le Hors: We will continue next week ←
14:50:24 <Ashok> topic: PATCH proposals
14:52:40 <Ashok> Arnaud: Sandro sent mail proposing we add both proposals into the spec as features at risk
Arnaud Le Hors: Sandro sent mail proposing we add both proposals into the spec as features at risk ←
14:53:02 <Ashok> ... based on implementation proposals we can then decide
... based on implementation proposals we can then decide ←
14:53:34 <Ashok> Arnaud: There are other PATCH proposals
Arnaud Le Hors: There are other PATCH proposals ←
14:54:17 <bblfish> q+
Henry Story: q+ ←
14:54:22 <Arnaud> ack bblfish
Arnaud Le Hors: ack bblfish ←
14:54:24 <Ashok> ... is it a good idea to have several proposals in the spec marked as "at risk"
... is it a good idea to have several proposals in the spec marked as "at risk" ←
14:55:23 <Ashok> Henry: With the TURTLE proposal you would have to number the blank nodes ... may require changing the triple store
Henry Story: With the TURTLE proposal you would have to number the blank nodes ... may require changing the triple store ←
14:56:10 <Ashok> Arnaud: If you have a SPARQL engine, the SPARQL-based proposal is easier. If not perhaps the other proposal is simpler
Arnaud Le Hors: If you have a SPARQL engine, the SPARQL-based proposal is easier. If not perhaps the other proposal is simpler ←
14:57:02 <SteveS> q+
Steve Speicher: q+ ←
14:57:04 <bblfish> that seems ok, if we really have two PATCH formats competing
Henry Story: that seems ok, if we really have two PATCH formats competing ←
14:57:28 <Arnaud> ack steves
Arnaud Le Hors: ack steves ←
14:57:30 <stevebattle5> q+
Steve Battle: q+ ←
14:57:45 <Ashok> Ted: Not a good solution but the best way to go
Ted Thibodeau: Not a good solution but the best way to go ←
14:58:34 <Zakim> -TallTed
Zakim IRC Bot: -TallTed ←
14:58:55 <Ashok> SteveS: Eric claims the problems Sandro is worrying about don't occur in the wild
Steve Speicher: Eric claims the problems Sandro is worrying about don't occur in the wild ←
14:59:08 <bblfish> That would be cool
Henry Story: That would be cool ←
14:59:20 <bblfish> q+
Henry Story: q+ ←
14:59:26 <Arnaud> ack steveb
Arnaud Le Hors: ack steveb ←
14:59:54 <Ashok> SteveB: If there is an issue we cannot resolve it should not be in the spec
Steve Battle: If there is an issue we cannot resolve it should not be in the spec ←
15:00:06 <Arnaud> ack bblfish
Arnaud Le Hors: ack bblfish ←
15:00:19 <Ashok> Arnaud: That's the status quo ... nothing in the spec yet
Arnaud Le Hors: That's the status quo ... nothing in the spec yet ←
15:00:55 <Ashok> Henry: Perhaps test how easy the 2 options are to implement
Henry Story: Perhaps test how easy the 2 options are to implement ←
15:01:28 <bblfish> yes: competition: try to make the most elegant version of the SPARQL solution.
Henry Story: yes: competition: try to make the most elegant version of the SPARQL solution. ←
15:01:40 <bblfish> thanks Ashok
Henry Story: thanks Ashok ←
15:01:48 <Zakim> -BartvanLeeuwen
Zakim IRC Bot: -BartvanLeeuwen ←
15:01:51 <stevebattle5> bye
Steve Battle: bye ←
15:01:52 <Zakim> -svillata
Zakim IRC Bot: -svillata ←
15:01:53 <Zakim> -bblfish
Zakim IRC Bot: -bblfish ←
15:01:54 <Zakim> -cody
Zakim IRC Bot: -cody ←
15:01:54 <Zakim> -JohnArwe
Zakim IRC Bot: -JohnArwe ←
15:01:55 <Zakim> -Arnaud
Zakim IRC Bot: -Arnaud ←
15:01:58 <Zakim> -SteveS
Zakim IRC Bot: -SteveS ←
15:01:59 <Zakim> -Kalpa
Zakim IRC Bot: -Kalpa ←
15:02:00 <Zakim> -Ashok_Malhotra
Zakim IRC Bot: -Ashok_Malhotra ←
15:02:02 <Zakim> -stevebattle5
Zakim IRC Bot: -stevebattle5 ←
15:02:02 <Arnaud> trackbot, end meeting
Arnaud Le Hors: trackbot, end meeting ←
15:02:02 <trackbot> Zakim, list attendees
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, list attendees ←
15:02:03 <Zakim> SW_LDP()10:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_LDP()10:00AM has ended ←
15:02:03 <Zakim> Attendees were Arnaud, cody, +1.919.306.aaaa, Ashok_Malhotra, stevebattle5, SteveS, TallTed, JohnArwe, bblfish, BartvanLeeuwen, svillata, Kalpa
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were Arnaud, cody, +1.919.306.aaaa, Ashok_Malhotra, stevebattle5, SteveS, TallTed, JohnArwe, bblfish, BartvanLeeuwen, svillata, Kalpa ←
15:02:03 <Zakim> sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is ←
15:02:10 <trackbot> RRSAgent, please draft minutes
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, please draft minutes ←
15:02:10 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/09/23-ldp-minutes.html trackbot
RRSAgent IRC Bot: I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/09/23-ldp-minutes.html trackbot ←
15:02:11 <trackbot> RRSAgent, bye
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, bye ←
15:02:11 <RRSAgent> I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2013/09/23-ldp-actions.rdf :
RRSAgent IRC Bot: I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2013/09/23-ldp-actions.rdf : ←
15:02:11 <RRSAgent> ACTION: 93 to Can be closed [1]
ACTION: 93 to Can be closed [1] ←
<RRSAgent> ACTION: 97 to Can be closed [2]
ACTION: 97 to Can be closed [2] ←
<RRSAgent> ACTION: 98 to Can be closed [3]
ACTION: 98 to Can be closed [3] ←
15:02:11 <RRSAgent> recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/09/23-ldp-irc#T14-11-26
RRSAgent IRC Bot: recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/09/23-ldp-irc#T14-11-26 ←
Formatted by CommonScribe