12:58:56 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/03/20-dwbp-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/03/20-dwbp-irc ←
12:58:58 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs 351
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs 351 ←
12:59:00 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be DWBP
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be DWBP ←
12:59:00 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see DATA_DWBP()9:00AM scheduled to start in 1 minute
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see DATA_DWBP()9:00AM scheduled to start in 1 minute ←
12:59:01 <trackbot> Meeting: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference
12:59:01 <trackbot> Date: 20 March 2015
12:59:32 <Zakim> DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has now started
Zakim IRC Bot: DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has now started ←
12:59:40 <Zakim> +yaso
Zakim IRC Bot: +yaso ←
13:00:04 <Zakim> +SumitPurohit
Zakim IRC Bot: +SumitPurohit ←
13:00:40 <Zakim> +??P12
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P12 ←
13:00:48 <yaso2> Zakim, yaso has carolilne
Yaso Córdova: Zakim, yaso has carolilne ←
13:00:48 <Zakim> +carolilne; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +carolilne; got it ←
13:00:53 <MTCarrasco> zakim, ??P12 is me
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: zakim, ??P12 is me ←
13:00:53 <Zakim> +MTCarrasco; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +MTCarrasco; got it ←
13:01:10 <Caroline> Zakim, yaso2 has Caroline
Caroline Burle: Zakim, yaso2 has Caroline ←
13:01:10 <Zakim> sorry, Caroline, I do not recognize a party named 'yaso2'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, Caroline, I do not recognize a party named 'yaso2' ←
13:01:14 <Zakim> +??P15
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P15 ←
13:01:16 <MTCarrasco> zakim, mute me
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: zakim, mute me ←
13:01:16 <Zakim> MTCarrasco should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: MTCarrasco should now be muted ←
13:01:27 <Zakim> +annette_g
Zakim IRC Bot: +annette_g ←
13:01:31 <jerdeb> zakim, ??P15 is me
Jeremy Debattista: zakim, ??P15 is me ←
13:01:31 <Zakim> +jerdeb; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +jerdeb; got it ←
13:01:39 <Zakim> + +1.609.947.aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.609.947.aaaa ←
13:01:42 <yaso2> Zakim, yaso has Caroline
Yaso Córdova: Zakim, yaso has Caroline ←
13:01:42 <Zakim> +Caroline; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +Caroline; got it ←
13:02:02 <Zakim> +estephan
Zakim IRC Bot: +estephan ←
13:02:57 <yaso2> Anyone wants to scribe?
Yaso Córdova: Anyone wants to scribe? ←
13:02:57 <yaso2> Guest: Newton Calegari
13:03:13 <yaso2> Zakim, pick a victim
Yaso Córdova: Zakim, pick a victim ←
13:03:13 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose SumitPurohit
Zakim IRC Bot: Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose SumitPurohit ←
13:03:19 <yaso2> Chair: Yaso
13:03:27 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
13:03:36 <antoine> zakim, IPcaller is me
Antoine Isaac: zakim, IPcaller is me ←
13:03:36 <Zakim> +antoine; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +antoine; got it ←
13:04:27 <yaso2> Zakim, yaso has newton
Yaso Córdova: Zakim, yaso has newton ←
13:04:27 <Zakim> +newton; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +newton; got it ←
13:04:49 <Adriano_C> Hi all! Today I am online in chat mode.
Adriano Pereira: Hi all! Today I am online in chat mode. ←
13:05:36 <yaso2> Scribe: Caroline
(Scribe set to Caroline Burle)
13:06:01 <yaso2> http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-03-13
Yaso Córdova: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-03-13 ←
13:06:34 <Caroline> PROPOSED: approve last week minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-03-13
PROPOSED: approve last week minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-03-13 ←
13:06:38 <ericstephan> +1
Eric Stephan: +1 ←
13:06:42 <newton> +1
Newton Calegari: +1 ←
13:06:43 <Caroline> thank you, ericstephan!
thank you, ericstephan! ←
13:06:44 <BernadetteLoscio> +1
Bernadette Farias Loscio: +1 ←
13:06:45 <Caroline> +1
+1 ←
13:06:47 <annette_g> +1
Annette Greiner: +1 ←
13:06:48 <yaso2> +1
Yaso Córdova: +1 ←
13:06:51 <MTCarrasco> +1
13:06:51 <SumitPurohit> +1
Sumit Purohit: +1 ←
13:06:54 <annette_g> isn't it PROPOSED?
Annette Greiner: isn't it PROPOSED? ←
13:07:07 <Caroline> RESOLVED: approved last week minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-03-13
RESOLVED: approved last week minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-03-13 ←
13:07:11 <Adriano_C> +1
Adriano Pereira: +1 ←
13:07:15 <Caroline> yes, annette_g! Thank you!
yes, annette_g! Thank you! ←
13:07:40 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
13:07:50 <laufer> zakim, IPcaller is me
Carlos Laufer: zakim, IPcaller is me ←
13:07:50 <Zakim> +laufer; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +laufer; got it ←
13:07:54 <Zakim> +RiccardoAlbertoni
Zakim IRC Bot: +RiccardoAlbertoni ←
13:08:00 <laufer> zakim, mute me
Carlos Laufer: zakim, mute me ←
13:08:00 <Zakim> laufer should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: laufer should now be muted ←
13:08:02 <Zakim> -RiccardoAlbertoni
Zakim IRC Bot: -RiccardoAlbertoni ←
13:08:21 <Zakim> +RiccardoAlbertoni
Zakim IRC Bot: +RiccardoAlbertoni ←
13:08:51 <yaso2> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2014Oct/0181.html#start181
Yaso Córdova: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2014Oct/0181.html#start181 ←
13:09:10 <laufer> +1 (delayed)
Carlos Laufer: +1 (delayed) ←
13:09:10 <Caroline> yaso2: we can talk about this issue https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2014Oct/0181.html#start181 and try to close it
Yaso Córdova: we can talk about this issue https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2014Oct/0181.html#start181 and try to close it ←
13:09:27 <ericstephan> q+
Eric Stephan: q+ ←
13:09:38 <yaso2> Ack ericstephan
Yaso Córdova: Ack ericstephan ←
13:10:22 <Caroline> ericstephan: from the vocab perspective, if we have questions or ideas we could put together the issues and talk about them
Eric Stephan: from the vocab perspective, if we have questions or ideas we could put together the issues and talk about them ←
13:10:33 <Caroline> ... so we could resolve them as a working group
... so we could resolve them as a working group ←
13:11:27 <Caroline> ... I am not prepared to talk about specific issues, but I have some information that would be useful in the future
... I am not prepared to talk about specific issues, but I have some information that would be useful in the future ←
13:11:41 <Caroline> yaso2: could you talk about the data usage vocabulary
Yaso Córdova: could you talk about the data usage vocabulary ←
13:12:02 <Caroline> yaso2: we can start with the data usage
Yaso Córdova: we can start with the data usage ←
13:12:25 <Caroline> ericstephan: we can wait until the end of the call
Eric Stephan: we can wait until the end of the call ←
13:13:10 <yaso2> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/72
Yaso Córdova: http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/72 ←
13:13:21 <Caroline> yaso2: we could start then talking about some issues on the BP document. I suggest that we start with more general issues, for example the data enrichment http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/72
Yaso Córdova: we could start then talking about some issues on the BP document. I suggest that we start with more general issues, for example the data enrichment http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/72 ←
13:13:34 <antoine> this is a closed issue, no?
Antoine Isaac: this is a closed issue, no? ←
13:13:40 <Caroline> ... does anyone have any comment about it?
... does anyone have any comment about it? ←
13:13:55 <Caroline> ... yes it is closed
... yes it is closed ←
13:14:16 <annette_g> q+
Annette Greiner: q+ ←
13:14:22 <yaso2> Ack annette_g
Yaso Córdova: Ack annette_g ←
13:14:42 <Caroline> annette_g: maybe we can bring it up what we are talking by email
Annette Greiner: maybe we can bring it up what we are talking by email ←
13:14:58 <Zakim> +??P25
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P25 ←
13:15:03 <yaso2> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/144
Yaso Córdova: http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/144 ←
13:15:06 <Zakim> -??P25
Zakim IRC Bot: -??P25 ←
13:15:12 <Caroline> ... the issue about linked data
... the issue about linked data ←
13:15:20 <Zakim> +??P25
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P25 ←
13:15:22 <laufer> I think adriano was more linked to data enrichment, isn´t it?
Carlos Laufer: I think adriano was more linked to data enrichment, isn´t it? ←
13:15:23 <Caroline> yaso2: we were discussing it by email
Yaso Córdova: we were discussing it by email ←
13:15:36 <Caroline> I think so, laufer
I think so, laufer ←
13:15:56 <CarlosIglesias> zakim, ??P25 is me
Carlos Iglesias: zakim, ??P25 is me ←
13:15:56 <Zakim> +CarlosIglesias; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +CarlosIglesias; got it ←
13:15:57 <newton> q+
Newton Calegari: q+ ←
13:16:06 <yaso2> ack newton
Yaso Córdova: ack newton ←
13:16:12 <Caroline> ... did the group agree that we should propose semantic web and linked data?
... did the group agree that we should propose semantic web and linked data? ←
13:16:45 <Caroline> newton: we can have general BP and be more specific on the approach implementation
Newton Calegari: we can have general BP and be more specific on the approach implementation ←
13:16:57 <annette_g> +1
Annette Greiner: +1 ←
13:16:58 <ericstephan> +1 newton
Eric Stephan: +1 newton ←
13:17:01 <riccardoAlbertoni> +1
Riccardo Albertoni: +1 ←
13:17:07 <yaso2> +1
Yaso Córdova: +1 ←
13:17:07 <ericstephan> q+
Eric Stephan: q+ ←
13:17:12 <CarlosIglesias> q+
Carlos Iglesias: q+ ←
13:17:15 <yaso2> Ack ericstephan
Yaso Córdova: Ack ericstephan ←
13:17:38 <Caroline> ericstephan: I completely agree with newton and I understand we have an agreement by email that support newton's idea
Eric Stephan: I completely agree with newton and I understand we have an agreement by email that support newton's idea ←
13:18:07 <SumitPurohit> +q
Sumit Purohit: +q ←
13:18:14 <yaso2> Ack CarlosIglesias
Yaso Córdova: Ack CarlosIglesias ←
13:18:36 <Caroline> CarlosIglesias: I think LD ws never a problem
Carlos Iglesias: I think LD ws never a problem ←
13:18:46 <Caroline> ... the problem is where to put LD in the document
... the problem is where to put LD in the document ←
13:19:04 <MTCarrasco> q+
13:19:15 <laufer> q+
Carlos Laufer: q+ ←
13:19:15 <MTCarrasco> zakim, unmute me
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: zakim, unmute me ←
13:19:16 <Zakim> MTCarrasco should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: MTCarrasco should no longer be muted ←
13:19:31 <Caroline> ... we should keep the general BP neutral and provide as much as implementation techniques as we could
... we should keep the general BP neutral and provide as much as implementation techniques as we could ←
13:19:32 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:19:34 <Caroline> ... my only point from the beggining it to keep the overall neutrel
... my only point from the beggining it to keep the overall neutral ←
13:19:36 <yaso2> Ack SumitPurohit
Yaso Córdova: Ack SumitPurohit ←
13:19:41 <Caroline> s/neutrel/neutral
13:20:00 <Caroline> SumitPurohit: we should focus and write in our document and provide concrete use cases
Sumit Purohit: we should focus and write in our document and provide concrete use cases ←
13:20:16 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:20:18 <ericstephan> q+
Eric Stephan: q+ ←
13:20:24 <yaso2> Ack MTCarrasco
Yaso Córdova: Ack MTCarrasco ←
13:20:38 <Caroline> MTCarrasco: we must provide concrete examples of the most common use cases
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: we must provide concrete examples of the most common use cases ←
13:20:54 <annette_g> q+
Annette Greiner: q+ ←
13:20:56 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:20:58 <laufer> zakim, unmute me
Carlos Laufer: zakim, unmute me ←
13:20:58 <Zakim> laufer should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: laufer should no longer be muted ←
13:20:58 <Adriano_C> Laufer, probably there are aspects related to linked data that can be in the context of data enrichment, as you said!
Adriano Pereira: Laufer, probably there are aspects related to linked data that can be in the context of data enrichment, as you said! ←
13:20:59 <yaso2> Ack laufer
Yaso Córdova: Ack laufer ←
13:21:03 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
13:21:04 <Caroline> ... the document can be more neutral, but there is the need of specific cases
... the document can be more neutral, but there is the need of specific cases ←
13:21:05 <BernadetteLoscio> zakim, ipcaller is BernadetteLoscio
Bernadette Farias Loscio: zakim, ipcaller is BernadetteLoscio ←
13:21:05 <Zakim> +BernadetteLoscio; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +BernadetteLoscio; got it ←
13:21:06 <MTCarrasco> zakim, unmute
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: zakim, unmute ←
13:21:06 <Zakim> I don't understand 'unmute', MTCarrasco
Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand 'unmute', MTCarrasco ←
13:21:26 <MTCarrasco> zakim, mute me
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: zakim, mute me ←
13:21:26 <Zakim> MTCarrasco should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: MTCarrasco should now be muted ←
13:21:26 <Caroline> laufer: I agree with the idea that the document could talk about all the types of distribution of data
Carlos Laufer: I agree with the idea that the document could talk about all the types of distribution of data ←
13:21:26 <Caroline> ...
... ←
13:21:37 <MTCarrasco> zakim, unmute me
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: zakim, unmute me ←
13:21:37 <Zakim> MTCarrasco should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: MTCarrasco should no longer be muted ←
13:21:39 <BernadetteLoscio> q+
Bernadette Farias Loscio: q+ ←
13:21:53 <Caroline> ... I think we have BP that can be neutral, but I am not sure if we need specific BP when we talk about LD
... I think we have BP that can be neutral, but I am not sure if we need specific BP when we talk about LD ←
13:22:07 <Caroline> yaso2: laufer can you be more specific about your quesiton?
Yaso Córdova: laufer can you be more specific about your quesiton? ←
13:22:20 <yaso2> s/quesition/question
Yaso Córdova: s/quesition/question (warning: replacement failed) ←
13:22:35 <CarlosIglesias> BPs should never be driven by any specific tech but by users needs
Carlos Iglesias: BPs should never be driven by any specific tech but by users needs ←
13:22:48 <Caroline> laufer: for LD we need some information like the number of a type of property for example
Carlos Laufer: for LD we need some information like the number of a type of property for example ←
13:23:03 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:23:06 <Caroline> +1 to CarlosIglesias
+1 to CarlosIglesias ←
13:23:10 <ericstephan> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_data
Eric Stephan: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_data ←
13:23:11 <yaso2> Ack ericstephan
Yaso Córdova: Ack ericstephan ←
13:23:19 <laufer> zakim, mute me
Carlos Laufer: zakim, mute me ←
13:23:19 <Zakim> laufer should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: laufer should now be muted ←
13:23:41 <Caroline> ericstephan: I am wondering if we have the definition of open data described well enough
Eric Stephan: I am wondering if we have the definition of open data described well enough ←
13:23:45 <MTCarrasco> We *must* provide clear examples for the most common cases - indeed, we could maintain a library of examples
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: We *must* provide clear examples for the most common cases - indeed, we could maintain a library of examples ←
13:24:01 <Caroline> ... to me LD is just one specialization of the open data concept
... to me LD is just one specialization of the open data concept ←
13:24:15 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:24:23 <Caroline> ... maybe we are not defining open data cleary enough
... maybe we are not defining open data cleary enough ←
13:24:26 <MTCarrasco> http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html ←
13:24:31 <yaso2> Ack annette_g
Yaso Córdova: Ack annette_g ←
13:24:32 <Caroline> yaso2: maybe that take us to the question about the glossary
Yaso Córdova: maybe that take us to the question about the glossary ←
13:24:34 <MTCarrasco> Back to the source
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: Back to the source ←
13:25:00 <Caroline> annette_g: maybe we could use the 5 starts or something like that to give priorities
Annette Greiner: maybe we could use the 5 starts or something like that to give priorities ←
13:25:15 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:25:23 <yaso2> Ack BernadetteLoscio
Yaso Córdova: Ack BernadetteLoscio ←
13:26:01 <Caroline> BernadetteLoscio: I would like to know from the group if there is a difference between publishing LD and using it as a concept
Bernadette Farias Loscio: I would like to know from the group if there is a difference between publishing LD and using it as a concept ←
13:26:22 <Caroline> ... the other thing is that we are proposing to use the LD concept to publish data
... the other thing is that we are proposing to use the LD concept to publish data ←
13:26:33 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:26:36 <MTCarrasco> q
13:26:38 <Caroline> ... maybe the LD concept will hel to publish the data in a proper way
... maybe the LD concept will hel to publish the data in a proper way ←
13:26:53 <laufer> q+
Carlos Laufer: q+ ←
13:26:57 <annette_g> q+
Annette Greiner: q+ ←
13:26:58 <Caroline> yaso2: may we can use RDF concepts in use cases that are not LD, if I undertood tour question
Yaso Córdova: may we can use RDF concepts in use cases that are not LD, if I undertood tour question ←
13:27:31 <Caroline> BernadetteLoscio: jus tto make clear. About the use cases, I wanted to understand what do you mean abotu LD concepts.
Bernadette Farias Loscio: jus tto make clear. About the use cases, I wanted to understand what do you mean abotu LD concepts. ←
13:27:51 <Caroline> yaso2: I think that using RDF or RDFa
Yaso Córdova: I think that using RDF or RDFa ←
13:28:01 <Caroline> ... using Web APIs maybe is not LD
... using Web APIs maybe is not LD ←
13:28:23 <Caroline> ... using microdata is not necessarly LD
... using microdata is not necessarly LD ←
13:28:49 <Caroline> ... about the use cases, I could see14 use cases that explicit mentioned LD in the approaches
... about the use cases, I could see14 use cases that explicit mentioned LD in the approaches ←
13:29:06 <Caroline> ... maybe we could work with more use cases that do not mention LD
... maybe we could work with more use cases that do not mention LD ←
13:29:14 <BernadetteLoscio> q+
Bernadette Farias Loscio: q+ ←
13:29:22 <MTCarrasco> "When someone looks up a URI, provide useful information, using the standards": RDF is *not* necessarily LD - "When someone looks up a URI, provide useful information, using the standards" -
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: "When someone looks up a URI, provide useful information, using the standards": RDF is *not* necessarily LD - "When someone looks up a URI, provide useful information, using the standards" - ←
13:29:30 <ericstephan> +1 yaso2
Eric Stephan: +1 yaso2 ←
13:29:33 <Caroline> ... I think it is okay to be biased towards linked data, because the 5 stars
... I think it is okay to be biased towards linked data, because the 5 stars ←
13:29:34 <MTCarrasco> http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html ←
13:29:42 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:29:48 <MTCarrasco> q+
13:30:25 <Caroline> BernadetteLoscio: I just think that fact that we have use cases that mention LD does not mean that the requirements mention to publish LD
Bernadette Farias Loscio: I just think that fact that we have use cases that mention LD does not mean that the requirements mention to publish LD ←
13:30:26 <laufer> zakim, unmute me
Carlos Laufer: zakim, unmute me ←
13:30:26 <Zakim> laufer should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: laufer should no longer be muted ←
13:30:28 <yaso2> Ack laufer
Yaso Córdova: Ack laufer ←
13:30:29 <Caroline> ... it says to publish data
... it says to publish data ←
13:30:32 <BernadetteLoscio> q-
Bernadette Farias Loscio: q- ←
13:30:40 <ericstephan> BernadetteLoscio - you raise a very interesting point
Eric Stephan: BernadetteLoscio - you raise a very interesting point ←
13:30:46 <Caroline> laufer: I think we have Semantic Web concepts, LD concepts and publishing concepts
Carlos Laufer: I think we have Semantic Web concepts, LD concepts and publishing concepts ←
13:31:07 <ericstephan> Linked data has highly influenced open data
Eric Stephan: Linked data has highly influenced open data ←
13:31:20 <yaso2> ericstephan: agree
Eric Stephan: agree [ Scribe Assist by Yaso Córdova ] ←
13:31:30 <Caroline> ... some concepts such as publishing metadata, sometimes we get confused about semantic web. When we talk about metadata we are not talking about Semantic Web or LD
... some concepts such as publishing metadata, sometimes we get confused about semantic web. When we talk about metadata we are not talking about Semantic Web or LD ←
13:31:39 <Caroline> +1 to laufer
+1 to laufer ←
13:31:46 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:31:50 <Caroline> ... it is a concept of publishing data
... it is a concept of publishing data ←
13:31:52 <laufer> zakim, mute me
Carlos Laufer: zakim, mute me ←
13:31:52 <Zakim> laufer should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: laufer should now be muted ←
13:31:52 <yaso2> Ack annette_g
Yaso Córdova: Ack annette_g ←
13:32:05 <Caroline> annette_g: I think you can do linked data with an API
Annette Greiner: I think you can do linked data with an API ←
13:32:49 <Caroline> ... the BPs should be as netural as possible
... the BPs should be as neutral as possible ←
13:32:51 <riccardoAlbertoni> +1
Riccardo Albertoni: +1 ←
13:33:01 <Caroline> ... people could see LD as an alternative
... people could see LD as an alternative ←
13:33:09 <yaso2> Ack MTCarrasco
Yaso Córdova: Ack MTCarrasco ←
13:33:22 <newton> s/netural/neutral
13:33:41 <Caroline> MTCarrasco: LD was written by Tim Berners Lee. LD is about publishing a structure data
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: LD was written by Tim Berners Lee. LD is about publishing a structure data ←
13:34:02 <Caroline> ... it doesn't have to use RDF
... it doesn't have to use RDF ←
13:34:02 <laufer> I disagree
Carlos Laufer: I disagree ←
13:34:16 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:34:17 <Caroline> ... this is essential to create higher level
... this is essential to create higher level ←
13:34:23 <Caroline> ... of semantics
... of semantics ←
13:34:34 <newton> +1 annette_g I agree that BPs should be neutral. And I don't see any problem in show approaches to implementation close related to semantic web or LD concepts, such as using RDFa, using some vocabs
Newton Calegari: +1 annette_g I agree that BPs should be neutral. And I don't see any problem in show approaches to implementation close related to semantic web or LD concepts, such as using RDFa, using some vocabs ←
13:34:34 <Caroline> ... the essential part is that the data is structural
... the essential part is that the data is structural ←
13:34:41 <annette_g> http://5stardata.info
Annette Greiner: http://5stardata.info ←
13:34:42 <yaso2> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/68
Yaso Córdova: http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/68 ←
13:34:58 <annette_g> structured is 2 stars
Annette Greiner: structured is 2 stars ←
13:35:00 <Caroline> yaso2: this discussion about structured data is in an open issue, where it says we should define structure
Yaso Córdova: this discussion about structured data is in an open issue, where it says we should define structure ←
13:35:04 <laufer> a csv file is structured too but is not LD
Carlos Laufer: a csv file is structured too but is not LD ←
13:35:13 <Caroline> ... we must discuss these open issues
... we must discuss these open issues ←
13:35:28 <BernadetteLoscio> the LD glossay explicitly mentions RDF: http://www.w3.org/TR/ld-glossary/
Bernadette Farias Loscio: the LD glossay explicitly mentions RDF: http://www.w3.org/TR/ld-glossary/ ←
13:35:29 <ericstephan> Its interesting that it calls it the 5 star Open Data not LD system annette_g
Eric Stephan: Its interesting that it calls it the 5 star Open Data not LD system annette_g ←
13:35:43 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:35:56 <Caroline> ... our charter mentions data on the web. There is a definition about data on the web. Is data on the web somehow connected with LD concept?
... our charter mentions data on the web. There is a definition about data on the web. Is data on the web somehow connected with LD concept? ←
13:36:06 <laufer> I think we are talking abot publishing datasets on the web
Carlos Laufer: I think we are talking abot publishing datasets on the web ←
13:36:07 <annette_g> q+
Annette Greiner: q+ ←
13:36:13 <yaso2> Ack annette_g
Yaso Córdova: Ack annette_g ←
13:36:16 <MTCarrasco> The key aspect is that the data is *structured* - the format is secondary - in our case it must be web-friendly
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: The key aspect is that the data is *structured* - the format is secondary - in our case it must be web-friendly ←
13:36:18 <BernadetteLoscio> yes... open data doesn't mention RDF
Bernadette Farias Loscio: yes... open data doesn't mention RDF ←
13:36:23 <CarlosIglesias> I will raise then the same question as usual, could somebody say that RESTful APIs are not data on the web for example?
Carlos Iglesias: I will raise then the same question as usual, could somebody say that RESTful APIs are not data on the web for example? ←
13:36:29 <ericstephan> +1 annette_g
Eric Stephan: +1 annette_g ←
13:36:39 <Caroline> annette_g: using URI is also part of it
Annette Greiner: using URI is also part of it ←
13:36:42 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:37:01 <Caroline> MTCarrasco: without links we cannot go to the gigher level of semantics
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: without links we cannot go to the gigher level of semantics ←
13:37:07 <BernadetteLoscio> q+
Bernadette Farias Loscio: q+ ←
13:37:08 <Caroline> ... there must be links to all the data
... there must be links to all the data ←
13:37:15 <Caroline> .... to create semantic aspects
.... to create semantic aspects ←
13:37:15 <ericstephan> you can use links without semantics REST shows you can link data to web pages
Eric Stephan: you can use links without semantics REST shows you can link data to web pages ←
13:37:31 <Caroline> yaso2: microdata don't presupose that we should URIs
Yaso Córdova: microdata don't presupose that we should URIs ←
13:37:32 <laufer> If we enter in this discussion, the data of out meeting is also data on the web...
Carlos Laufer: If we enter in this discussion, the data of out meeting is also data on the web... ←
13:37:39 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:37:55 <Caroline> MTCarrasco: can you write down?
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: can you write down? ←
13:37:56 <annette_g> type it?
Annette Greiner: type it? ←
13:37:58 <laufer> our meeting
Carlos Laufer: our meeting ←
13:38:03 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:38:03 <Caroline> please, type it! :)
please, type it! :) ←
13:38:12 <yaso2> Ack BernadetteLoscio
Yaso Córdova: Ack BernadetteLoscio ←
13:38:37 <Caroline> BernadetteLoscio: in the LD glossary there is also teh 5 stars for linked open data and it mentions the RDF
Bernadette Farias Loscio: in the LD glossary there is also teh 5 stars for linked open data and it mentions the RDF ←
13:38:44 <Caroline> ... the 5 star is about RDF and URI
... the 5 star is about RDF and URI ←
13:38:50 <BernadetteLoscio> http://www.w3.org/TR/ld-glossary/
Bernadette Farias Loscio: http://www.w3.org/TR/ld-glossary/ ←
13:38:59 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:39:01 <CarlosIglesias> please note that 5 starts of linked open data is about *linked* open data
Carlos Iglesias: please note that 5 starts of linked open data is about *linked* open data ←
13:39:15 <MTCarrasco> +1
13:39:18 <CarlosIglesias> as its name makes clear
Carlos Iglesias: as its name makes clear ←
13:39:22 <Caroline> yaso2: should we close these issues?
Yaso Córdova: should we close these issues? ←
13:39:41 <ericstephan> Perhaps we need to start talking about general open data (1-3 stars) and linked data (4-5 stars)
Eric Stephan: Perhaps we need to start talking about general open data (1-3 stars) and linked data (4-5 stars) ←
13:39:42 <yaso2> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/open
Yaso Córdova: http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/open ←
13:39:56 <laufer> 5 star is a path to LD... if one does not want to go to LD, 5 stars is not an answer...
Carlos Laufer: 5 star is a path to LD... if one does not want to go to LD, 5 stars is not an answer... ←
13:39:58 <BernadetteLoscio> yes.... open data and data on the web are not just about RDF
Bernadette Farias Loscio: yes.... open data and data on the web are not just about RDF ←
13:40:01 <CarlosIglesias> q+
Carlos Iglesias: q+ ←
13:40:11 <Caroline> ericstephan, could you detail your proposal?
ericstephan, could you detail your proposal? ←
13:40:33 <Caroline> yaso2: should we focus on closing the issues that help to define the general concepts?
Yaso Córdova: should we focus on closing the issues that help to define the general concepts? ←
13:40:42 <Caroline> ... defining structure, datasets, etc
... defining structure, datasets, etc ←
13:40:43 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:40:45 <MTCarrasco> 5 stars is Linked RDF - http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: 5 stars is Linked RDF - http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html ←
13:41:05 <Caroline> BernadetteLoscio: thinking about definition related to terminology I am not sure we can close them now
Bernadette Farias Loscio: thinking about definition related to terminology I am not sure we can close them now ←
13:41:12 <Caroline> yaso2: they might delivery some actions
Yaso Córdova: they might delivery some actions ←
13:41:16 <yaso2> Ack CarlosIglesias
Yaso Córdova: Ack CarlosIglesias ←
13:41:17 <laufer> If we center our doc in the 5 stars we will be saying that people should follow the 5 star idea...
Carlos Laufer: If we center our doc in the 5 stars we will be saying that people should follow the 5 star idea... ←
13:41:18 <ericstephan> Caroline, I guess I was just following the discussion and wondering based on what annette_g had suggested that we be explicit using the 5 star range to say what is open and linked data
Eric Stephan: Caroline, I guess I was just following the discussion and wondering based on what annette_g had suggested that we be explicit using the 5 star range to say what is open and linked data ←
13:41:42 <Caroline> thank you, ericstephan!
thank you, ericstephan! ←
13:41:48 <ericstephan> laufer is that a bad idea? 5
Eric Stephan: laufer is that a bad idea? 5 ←
13:42:17 <laufer> I am not sayin yes or no, eric... just pointing what we will say...
Carlos Laufer: I am not sayin yes or no, eric... just pointing what we will say... ←
13:42:18 <ericstephan> it is an open data scale not LD scale though
Eric Stephan: it is an open data scale not LD scale though ←
13:42:18 <Caroline> CarlosIglesias: we can use LD as a case to produce data on the web document
Carlos Iglesias: we can use LD as a case to produce data on the web document ←
13:42:36 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:42:37 <ericstephan> okay laufer :-)
Eric Stephan: okay laufer :-) ←
13:42:45 <MTCarrasco> not only RDF: +1
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: not only RDF: +1 ←
13:43:02 <Caroline> CarlosIglesias could you type what you just said, please?
CarlosIglesias could you type what you just said, please? ←
13:43:04 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:43:42 <Caroline> ... I don't know what is the big issue. I provided recommendation how to address all of them
... I don't know what is the big issue. I provided recommendation how to address all of them ←
13:43:44 <laufer> q+
Carlos Laufer: q+ ←
13:44:00 <Caroline> ... if we focus on these specific issues
... if we focus on these specific issues ←
13:44:29 <Caroline> yaso2: do you mean your comments on google document?
Yaso Córdova: do you mean your comments on google document? ←
13:44:31 <BernadetteLoscio> q+
Bernadette Farias Loscio: q+ ←
13:44:32 <Caroline> CarlosIglesias: yes
Carlos Iglesias: yes ←
13:44:52 <Caroline> BernadetteLoscio: the document is the previous version
Bernadette Farias Loscio: the document is the previous version ←
13:45:07 <Caroline> ... the comments were about the previous version
... the comments were about the previous version ←
13:45:24 <Caroline> CarlosIglesias: are you saying that the suggestions that CarlosIglesias made are already in the document?
Carlos Iglesias: are you saying that the suggestions that CarlosIglesias made are already in the document? ←
13:45:34 <Caroline> BernadetteLoscio: we must check the published document
Bernadette Farias Loscio: we must check the published document ←
13:45:50 <Caroline> yaso2: CarlosIglesias could you check the pubilshed document
Yaso Córdova: CarlosIglesias could you check the pubilshed document ←
13:45:53 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:45:56 <laufer> zakim, unmute me
Carlos Laufer: zakim, unmute me ←
13:45:56 <Zakim> laufer should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: laufer should no longer be muted ←
13:45:59 <BernadetteLoscio> q-
Bernadette Farias Loscio: q- ←
13:46:13 <Caroline> ACTION for CarlosIglesias to review the BP document and check his previews suggestions
ACTION for CarlosIglesias to review the BP document and check his previews suggestions ←
13:46:13 <trackbot> Error finding 'for'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/users>.
Trackbot IRC Bot: Error finding 'for'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/users>. ←
13:46:31 <MTCarrasco> q+
13:46:36 <Caroline> ACTION: CarlosIglesias to review the BP document and check his previews suggestions
ACTION: CarlosIglesias to review the BP document and check his previews suggestions ←
13:46:36 <trackbot> Created ACTION-145 - Review the bp document and check his previews suggestions [on Carlos Iglesias - due 2015-03-27].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-145 - Review the bp document and check his previews suggestions [on Carlos Iglesias - due 2015-03-27]. ←
13:46:40 <BernadetteLoscio> q+
Bernadette Farias Loscio: q+ ←
13:46:45 <ericstephan> I like that laufer
Eric Stephan: I like that laufer ←
13:46:52 <Caroline> laufer: the group should vote if we should support the 5 stars
Carlos Laufer: the group should vote if we should support the 5 stars ←
13:46:58 <annette_g> q+
Annette Greiner: q+ ←
13:47:03 <newton> q+
Newton Calegari: q+ ←
13:47:07 <SumitPurohit> laufer: +1
Carlos Laufer: +1 [ Scribe Assist by Sumit Purohit ] ←
13:47:07 <ericstephan> or use 5 star to describe open data overall
Eric Stephan: or use 5 star to describe open data overall ←
13:47:09 <Caroline> ... so we decide if go to LD is what we want to do
... so we decide if go to LD is what we want to do ←
13:47:11 <laufer> zakim, unmute me
Carlos Laufer: zakim, unmute me ←
13:47:11 <Zakim> laufer was not muted, laufer
Zakim IRC Bot: laufer was not muted, laufer ←
13:47:17 <yaso2> Ack CarlosIglesias
Yaso Córdova: Ack CarlosIglesias ←
13:47:21 <newton> q-
Newton Calegari: q- ←
13:47:26 <Caroline> CarlosIglesias: I don't understand why
Carlos Iglesias: I don't understand why ←
13:47:36 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:47:42 <yaso2> ack laufer
Yaso Córdova: ack laufer ←
13:48:27 <Caroline> ... if we put that in our document it should be based on the reality
... if we put that in our document it should be based on the reality ←
13:48:43 <Caroline> ... that is the reason for my doubts
... that is the reason for my doubts ←
13:48:43 <laufer> zakim, unmute me
Carlos Laufer: zakim, unmute me ←
13:48:43 <Zakim> laufer was not muted, laufer
Zakim IRC Bot: laufer was not muted, laufer ←
13:49:30 <CarlosIglesias> for your reference: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ecwweAM5t4UVFEjcXnFhXmCUBnRDvwZ1smRLtiKkBEI/edit#heading=h.oa5hnn7ctefr
Carlos Iglesias: for your reference: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ecwweAM5t4UVFEjcXnFhXmCUBnRDvwZ1smRLtiKkBEI/edit#heading=h.oa5hnn7ctefr ←
13:49:36 <ericstephan> q+
Eric Stephan: q+ ←
13:49:39 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:49:52 <Caroline> laufer: if we need a neutral document and we talk about the 5 stars, it says that the best way to do it is going through LD
Carlos Laufer: if we need a neutral document and we talk about the 5 stars, it says that the best way to do it is going through LD ←
13:50:01 <Caroline> ... I am not saying it is good or bad
... I am not saying it is good or bad ←
13:50:06 <laufer> zakim, mute me
Carlos Laufer: zakim, mute me ←
13:50:06 <Zakim> laufer should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: laufer should now be muted ←
13:50:11 <CarlosIglesias> 5 stars is not neutral
Carlos Iglesias: 5 stars is not neutral ←
13:50:16 <yaso2> ack annette_g
Yaso Córdova: ack annette_g ←
13:50:17 <CarlosIglesias> is a linked data scale
Carlos Iglesias: is a linked data scale ←
13:50:27 <CarlosIglesias> as its name clearly reads
Carlos Iglesias: as its name clearly reads ←
13:50:28 <laufer> is what I am saying, carlos
Carlos Laufer: is what I am saying, carlos ←
13:50:35 <BernadetteLoscio> Laufer, are you talking about publishing RDF?
Bernadette Farias Loscio: Laufer, are you talking about publishing RDF? ←
13:50:40 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:50:51 <Caroline> annette_g, please type it, I cannot understand
annette_g, please type it, I cannot understand ←
13:51:18 <yaso2> Ack MTCarrasco
Yaso Córdova: Ack MTCarrasco ←
13:51:20 <SumitPurohit> q+
Sumit Purohit: q+ ←
13:51:26 <ericstephan> I believe that 5 stars was originally thought of the "vision" for going to linked data, but why don't we change this to just state varying degrees of open data.
Eric Stephan: I believe that 5 stars was originally thought of the "vision" for going to linked data, but why don't we change this to just state varying degrees of open data. ←
13:51:30 <annette_g> I think support for LD and saying it's best are two different things.
Annette Greiner: I think support for LD and saying it's best are two different things. ←
13:51:42 <laufer> Bernadette, I am talking about our bias in the group that is reflected in the document...
Carlos Laufer: Bernadette, I am talking about our bias in the group that is reflected in the document... ←
13:51:47 <annette_g> I support LD but don't believe it's always best
Annette Greiner: I support LD but don't believe it's always best ←
13:51:55 <Caroline> MTCarrasco: LD it is what it is in the Tim Berners Lee document
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: LD it is what it is in the Tim Berners Lee document ←
13:51:59 <yaso2> +1 to annette_g
Yaso Córdova: +1 to annette_g ←
13:52:02 <Caroline> ... we cannot redefine it
... we cannot redefine it ←
13:52:02 <laufer> +1 anette
Carlos Laufer: +1 anette ←
13:52:12 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:52:18 <yaso2> Ack BernadetteLoscio
Yaso Córdova: Ack BernadetteLoscio ←
13:52:19 <Caroline> ... we should not confuse the 5 stars with LD
... we should not confuse the 5 stars with LD ←
13:52:41 <Caroline> BernadetteLoscio: I want to understand what laufer means when he says that we should support or not LD
Bernadette Farias Loscio: I want to understand what laufer means when he says that we should support or not LD ←
13:52:42 <laufer> zakim, unmute me
Carlos Laufer: zakim, unmute me ←
13:52:42 <Zakim> laufer should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: laufer should no longer be muted ←
13:53:08 <Caroline> laufer: I am not talking about support LD, I am talking about support the 5 stars
Carlos Laufer: I am not talking about support LD, I am talking about support the 5 stars ←
13:53:12 <CarlosIglesias> supporting the 5 stars of linked data is supporting linked data
Carlos Iglesias: supporting the 5 stars of linked data is supporting linked data ←
13:53:27 <Caroline> +1 to CarlosIglesias
+1 to CarlosIglesias ←
13:53:37 <annette_g> +1 to CarlosIglesias
Annette Greiner: +1 to CarlosIglesias ←
13:54:14 <CarlosIglesias> on the other hand, again, i'm very in favor of supporting linked data
Carlos Iglesias: on the other hand, again, i'm very in favor of supporting linked data ←
13:54:14 <Caroline> BernadetteLoscio: I want to understand in what context you are talking about
Bernadette Farias Loscio: I want to understand in what context you are talking about ←
13:54:17 <MTCarrasco> A) DWBP: LD and not LD - though 1 star LD is any data in the web B) LD: it is what is is in the TBL note C) Rating system: yes but not using
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: A) DWBP: LD and not LD - though 1 star LD is any data in the web B) LD: it is what is is in the TBL note C) Rating system: yes but not using ←
13:54:20 <CarlosIglesias> but among many other technologies
Carlos Iglesias: but among many other technologies ←
13:54:35 <Caroline> laufer: I am saying that if we talk about this we are supporting it in our document
Carlos Laufer: I am saying that if we talk about this we are supporting it in our document ←
13:54:39 <ericstephan> Can we adopt the 5 circle system?
Eric Stephan: Can we adopt the 5 circle system? ←
13:54:45 <laufer> zakim, mute me
Carlos Laufer: zakim, mute me ←
13:54:45 <Zakim> laufer should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: laufer should now be muted ←
13:54:48 <Caroline> yaso2: we are runing out of time
Yaso Córdova: we are runing out of time ←
13:54:48 <newton> q+
Newton Calegari: q+ ←
13:54:48 <yaso2> ack ericstephan
Yaso Córdova: ack ericstephan ←
13:54:49 <MTCarrasco> 5 stars must be with RDF
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: 5 stars must be with RDF ←
13:55:05 <BernadetteLoscio> Carlos, in your opinion, linked data is about RDF?
Bernadette Farias Loscio: Carlos, in your opinion, linked data is about RDF? ←
13:55:06 <Caroline> ericstephan: I agree that the 5 stars
Eric Stephan: I agree that the 5 stars ←
13:55:06 <yaso2> I'm closing the queue :-)
Yaso Córdova: I'm closing the queue :-) ←
13:55:26 <Caroline> ericstephan, sorry, I cannot understand, can you type, please
ericstephan, sorry, I cannot understand, can you type, please ←
13:55:31 <CarlosIglesias> you can link data on the web also without using rdf
Carlos Iglesias: you can link data on the web also without using rdf ←
13:55:38 <MTCarrasco> 1 star LD is any data in the web
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: 1 star LD is any data in the web ←
13:55:45 <BernadetteLoscio> ok ;)
Bernadette Farias Loscio: ok ;) ←
13:55:58 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:55:59 <CarlosIglesias> e.g. restful apis and hateoas
Carlos Iglesias: e.g. restful apis and hateoas ←
13:56:16 <yaso2> ack SumitPurohit
Yaso Córdova: ack SumitPurohit ←
13:56:25 <laufer> but Linked Data is a concept that is different of the broad idea of linking data, Carlos...
Carlos Laufer: but Linked Data is a concept that is different of the broad idea of linking data, Carlos... ←
13:56:26 <Caroline> ... we are all looking for describe open data and distinguishe ir from linked data
... we are all looking for describe open data and distinguishe ir from linked data ←
13:56:52 <laufer> in LD, RDF is the way... Thera are 4 clear principles...
Carlos Laufer: in LD, RDF is the way... Thera are 4 clear principles... ←
13:56:57 <Caroline> SumitPurohit: we should call the contributors to specify about the implementation
Sumit Purohit: we should call the contributors to specify about the implementation ←
13:57:05 <BernadetteLoscio> Carlos, linked data is about creating links between resources?
Bernadette Farias Loscio: Carlos, linked data is about creating links between resources? ←
13:57:15 <ericstephan> SumitPurohit I agree I was trying to make a joke :-)
Eric Stephan: SumitPurohit I agree I was trying to make a joke :-) ←
13:57:16 <yaso2> q?
Yaso Córdova: q? ←
13:57:28 <BernadetteLoscio> http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
Bernadette Farias Loscio: http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html ←
13:57:29 <yaso2> Ack newton
Yaso Córdova: Ack newton ←
13:57:31 <Caroline> ... we should clearly say if we are talking about one star available on the web or about 5 stars
... we should clearly say if we are talking about one star available on the web or about 5 stars ←
13:57:38 <newton> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#OpenFormat
Newton Calegari: http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#OpenFormat ←
13:57:41 <newton> BP 13
Newton Calegari: BP 13 ←
13:57:44 <Caroline> newton: about the discuss to use 5 star data in our document
Newton Calegari: about the discuss to use 5 star data in our document ←
13:57:45 <CarlosIglesias> you can create links between resources with restful apis and HATEOAS as well
Carlos Iglesias: you can create links between resources with restful apis and HATEOAS as well ←
13:57:46 <newton> 3 stars
Newton Calegari: 3 stars ←
13:57:49 <Zakim> -antoine
Zakim IRC Bot: -antoine ←
13:57:53 <SumitPurohit> eric : :-)
Sumit Purohit: eric : :-) ←
13:57:54 <MTCarrasco> We should aim at least for 3 stars
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: We should aim at least for 3 stars ←
13:58:02 <BernadetteLoscio> yes Carlos... I agree
Bernadette Farias Loscio: yes Carlos... I agree ←
13:58:05 <Caroline> the BP13 is close to the 3 stars
the BP13 is close to the 3 stars ←
13:58:18 <ericstephan> Is the 5 star only a path or can we make it a metric for a slightly different purpose
Eric Stephan: Is the 5 star only a path or can we make it a metric for a slightly different purpose ←
13:58:21 <laufer> Iet´s discuss in the list...
Carlos Laufer: Iet´s discuss in the list... ←
13:58:26 <MTCarrasco> In other words: structured data in the web
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: In other words: structured data in the web ←
13:58:36 <MTCarrasco> q+
13:58:46 <Caroline> ... the BP 13 is close to the 3 stars, should we make explicity that we are recommending it using the 5 stars?
... the BP 13 is close to the 3 stars, should we make explicity that we are recommending it using the 5 stars? ←
13:58:55 <Zakim> - +1.609.947.aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: - +1.609.947.aaaa ←
13:59:09 <ericstephan> We will use the email list
Eric Stephan: We will use the email list ←
13:59:13 <Caroline> yaso2: the queue is closed because we run out of time, I suggest that you continue discussing it by email
Yaso Córdova: the queue is closed because we run out of time, I suggest that you continue discussing it by email ←
13:59:24 <MTCarrasco> bye
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: bye ←
13:59:27 <Zakim> -MTCarrasco
Zakim IRC Bot: -MTCarrasco ←
13:59:28 <laufer> bye all
Carlos Laufer: bye all ←
13:59:29 <riccardoAlbertoni> bye ..
Riccardo Albertoni: bye .. ←
13:59:29 <yaso2> Bye all
Yaso Córdova: Bye all ←
13:59:30 <CarlosIglesias> bye bye!
Carlos Iglesias: bye bye! ←
13:59:30 <Caroline> thank you! Byr
thank you! Byr ←
13:59:30 <jerdeb> bye
Jeremy Debattista: bye ←
13:59:30 <Zakim> -SumitPurohit
Zakim IRC Bot: -SumitPurohit ←
13:59:32 <BernadetteLoscio> thanks!
Bernadette Farias Loscio: thanks! ←
13:59:32 <Zakim> -annette_g
Zakim IRC Bot: -annette_g ←
13:59:32 <Caroline> bye!
bye! ←
13:59:33 <annette_g> bye
Annette Greiner: bye ←
13:59:34 <Zakim> -estephan
Zakim IRC Bot: -estephan ←
13:59:35 <Zakim> -jerdeb
Zakim IRC Bot: -jerdeb ←
13:59:36 <Zakim> -RiccardoAlbertoni
Zakim IRC Bot: -RiccardoAlbertoni ←
13:59:41 <Zakim> -yaso
Zakim IRC Bot: -yaso ←
13:59:42 <Zakim> -BernadetteLoscio
Zakim IRC Bot: -BernadetteLoscio ←
13:59:45 <Zakim> -laufer
Zakim IRC Bot: -laufer ←
13:59:48 <Zakim> -CarlosIglesias
Zakim IRC Bot: -CarlosIglesias ←
13:59:49 <Zakim> DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has ended ←
13:59:49 <Zakim> Attendees were SumitPurohit, carolilne, MTCarrasco, annette_g, jerdeb, +1.609.947.aaaa, Caroline, estephan, antoine, newton, laufer, RiccardoAlbertoni, CarlosIglesias,
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were SumitPurohit, carolilne, MTCarrasco, annette_g, jerdeb, +1.609.947.aaaa, Caroline, estephan, antoine, newton, laufer, RiccardoAlbertoni, CarlosIglesias, ←
13:59:49 <Zakim> ... BernadetteLoscio
Zakim IRC Bot: ... BernadetteLoscio ←
13:59:54 <yaso2> RRSAgent, make logs public
Yaso Córdova: RRSAgent, make logs public ←
14:01:38 <Adriano_C> Bye! See ya!
Adriano Pereira: Bye! See ya! ←
Formatted by CommonScribe