13:08:48 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/08/29-dwbp-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/08/29-dwbp-irc ←
13:09:04 <ivan> rrsagent, set log public
Ivan Herman: rrsagent, set log public ←
13:09:14 <cgueret> topic: minutes from last week
13:09:17 <deirdrelee> Today's agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20140829
Deirdre Lee: Today's agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20140829 ←
13:09:31 <Zakim> +??P17
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P17 ←
13:10:07 <Zakim> +??P18
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P18 ←
13:10:09 <cgueret> PROPOSED: approve last week minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-08-22
PROPOSED: approve last week minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-08-22 ←
13:10:28 <deirdrelee> +1
Deirdre Lee: +1 ←
13:10:33 <cgueret> 0 - wasn't on the call
Christophe Gueret: 0 - wasn't on the call ←
13:10:40 <laufer> +1
Carlos Laufer: +1 ←
13:10:41 <ivan> +1
Ivan Herman: +1 ←
13:10:48 <antoine> +1
Antoine Isaac: +1 ←
13:10:54 <markharrison> +1
Mark Harrison: +1 ←
13:10:54 <adler1> +1
Steven Adler: +1 ←
13:10:58 <Ig_Bittencourt> 0
Ig Bittencourt Santana Pinto: 0 ←
13:11:05 <RiccardoAlbertoni> 0
13:11:05 <cgueret> RESOLVED: approved last week minutes
RESOLVED: approved last week minutes ←
13:11:09 <laufer> zakim, mute me
Carlos Laufer: zakim, mute me ←
13:11:09 <Zakim> laufer should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: laufer should now be muted ←
13:11:26 <markharrison> No
Mark Harrison: No ←
13:11:31 <laufer> yes
Carlos Laufer: yes ←
13:11:32 <cgueret> TOPIC: TPAC
13:11:33 <deirdrelee> scribe: cgueret
(Scribe set to Christophe Gueret)
13:11:48 <antoine> how many participants of the group are going there?
Antoine Isaac: how many participants of the group are going there? ←
13:11:56 <cgueret> deirdrelee: not registered yet, not sure will go
Deirdre Lee: not registered yet, not sure will go ←
13:12:08 <Ig_Bittencourt> I will probably be there.
Ig Bittencourt Santana Pinto: I will probably be there. ←
13:12:17 <cgueret> ivan: best to register only if you know you'll really go ;-)
Ivan Herman: best to register only if you know you'll really go ;-) ←
13:12:56 <cgueret> Zakim, who is speaking ?
Zakim, who is speaking ? ←
13:13:09 <Zakim> cgueret, listening for 12 seconds I heard sound from the following: deirdrelee (32%), EricKauz (7%), adler1 (19%)
Zakim IRC Bot: cgueret, listening for 12 seconds I heard sound from the following: deirdrelee (32%), EricKauz (7%), adler1 (19%) ←
13:13:19 <Zakim> -??P17
Zakim IRC Bot: -??P17 ←
13:13:19 <cgueret> EricKauz: not sure I will go either
Eric Kauz: not sure I will go either ←
13:13:42 <cgueret> deirdrelee: will there be remote participation ?
Deirdre Lee: will there be remote participation ? ←
13:13:55 <laufer> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2014/registrants#DWBP
Carlos Laufer: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2014/registrants#DWBP ←
13:13:56 <cgueret> ivan: not sure for video, phone will be available for sure
Ivan Herman: not sure for video, phone will be available for sure ←
13:14:04 <Zakim> +??P17
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P17 ←
13:14:30 <jerdeb> Zakim, ??P17 is me
Jeremy Debattista: Zakim, ??P17 is me ←
13:14:30 <Zakim> +jerdeb; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +jerdeb; got it ←
13:15:06 <cgueret> ivan: advance reg closes on Oct 8, late is open until the day of the conference
Ivan Herman: advance reg closes on Oct 8, late is open until the day of the conference ←
13:15:59 <cgueret> Topic: open issues and raised issues
13:16:48 <cgueret> deirdrelee: there is a lot of properties we re-used across all the documents
Deirdre Lee: there is a lot of properties we re-used across all the documents ←
13:17:05 <cgueret> ... applied in different contexts
... applied in different contexts ←
13:17:17 <cgueret> ... made a table to visualise the situation
... made a table to visualise the situation ←
13:17:36 <cgueret> ... let's talk about it and from there look at all the issues
... let's talk about it and from there look at all the issues ←
13:18:21 <cgueret> ... for instance for metadata we have all the keywords
... for instance for metadata we have all the keywords ←
13:18:59 <cgueret> ... shall all the concepts have all the properties associated to them ?
... shall all the concepts have all the properties associated to them ? ←
13:18:59 <antoine> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2014Aug/att-0081/DWBP_Requirements_Matrix.csv
Antoine Isaac: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2014Aug/att-0081/DWBP_Requirements_Matrix.csv ←
13:19:16 <cgueret> ... or is there that, e.g. do not need to be machine readable
... or is there that, e.g. do not need to be machine readable ←
13:19:43 <cgueret> EricKauz: machine readable should be a req for all
Eric Kauz: machine readable should be a req for all ←
13:19:54 <antoine> I've tried to summarize my points at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2014Aug/0083.html
Antoine Isaac: I've tried to summarize my points at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2014Aug/0083.html ←
13:20:31 <cgueret> ... difference between metadata and vocabs ?
... difference between metadata and vocabs ? ←
13:21:02 <cgueret> deirdrelee: metadata are descriptions, vocabularies are things such as DCAT and OWL
Deirdre Lee: metadata are descriptions, vocabularies are things such as DCAT and OWL ←
13:21:13 <cgueret> EricKauz: vocabularies are fields of metadata, right ?
Steven Adler: vocabularies are fields of metadata, right ? ←
13:21:21 <EricKauz> not me talking.
13:21:29 <cgueret> sorry :/
sorry :/ ←
13:21:34 <antoine> s/EricKauz/steve
13:21:40 <laufer> zakim, unmute me
Carlos Laufer: zakim, unmute me ←
13:21:40 <Zakim> laufer should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: laufer should no longer be muted ←
13:21:44 <markharrison> adler1 is talking, I think
Mark Harrison: adler1 is talking, I think ←
13:21:50 <deirdrelee> Q?
Deirdre Lee: Q? ←
13:22:30 <cgueret> adler1: the vocabulary is a single instance used by all the metadata
Steven Adler: the vocabulary is a single instance used by all the metadata ←
13:22:34 <cgueret> +1 to this def
+1 to this def ←
13:22:58 <antoine> -1 - refering to vocabularies as 'instance' is confusing
Antoine Isaac: -1 - refering to vocabularies as 'instance' is confusing ←
13:23:07 <antoine> ... but otherwise the intention is good
Antoine Isaac: ... but otherwise the intention is good ←
13:23:19 <cgueret> ... in practice metadata, formats and vocabularies are three facets of the same thing
... in practice metadata, formats and vocabularies are three facets of the same thing ←
13:23:40 <cgueret> ... is "provenance" lineage ?
... is "provenance" lineage ? ←
13:23:53 <cgueret> ... should be then a field in the metadata ?
... should be then a field in the metadata ? ←
13:23:54 <markharrison> +q to say that interoperability is a desirable outcome and that machine-readable + standardised are things we can do (as best practices) in order to support this desired outcome.
Mark Harrison: +q to say that interoperability is a desirable outcome and that machine-readable + standardised are things we can do (as best practices) in order to support this desired outcome. ←
13:23:54 <antoine> q+
Antoine Isaac: q+ ←
13:25:02 <cgueret> adler1: SLA may be a clause in a license
Steven Adler: SLA may be a clause in a license ←
13:25:14 <cgueret> ... whereas provenance can be a string
... whereas provenance can be a string ←
13:25:35 <cgueret> ... need many fields than can be all recorded in metadaat
... need many fields than can be all recorded in metadaat ←
13:25:48 <adler1> q+
Steven Adler: q+ ←
13:26:33 <cgueret> markharrison: looking at the table I think "interoperable" could be dropped as "machine-readable" is a req for this
Mark Harrison: looking at the table I think "interoperable" could be dropped as "machine-readable" is a req for this ←
13:26:57 <cgueret> adler1: so remove interoperable column ?
Steven Adler: so remove interoperable column ? ←
13:27:16 <cgueret> markharrison: can not be practicaly implemented unless you do machine readable and standardised
Mark Harrison: can not be practicaly implemented unless you do machine readable and standardised ←
13:28:01 <deirdrelee> Q+ to ask if differeint standard application-profile still implies interoperability?
Deirdre Lee: Q+ to ask if differeint standard application-profile still implies interoperability? ←
13:28:06 <deirdrelee> ack markharrison
Deirdre Lee: ack markharrison ←
13:28:06 <Zakim> markharrison, you wanted to say that interoperability is a desirable outcome and that machine-readable + standardised are things we can do (as best practices) in order to support
Zakim IRC Bot: markharrison, you wanted to say that interoperability is a desirable outcome and that machine-readable + standardised are things we can do (as best practices) in order to support ←
13:28:09 <Zakim> ... this desired outcome.
Zakim IRC Bot: ... this desired outcome. ←
13:28:15 <deirdrelee> ack antoine
Deirdre Lee: ack antoine ←
13:28:22 <adler1> q-
Steven Adler: q- ←
13:29:22 <cgueret> antoine: had licence provenance and SLA has type of metadata
Antoine Isaac: had licence provenance and SLA as type of metadata ←
13:29:27 <cgueret> s/has/as
13:29:47 <cgueret> adler1: vocabulary is the template of the metadata to describe the data
Steven Adler: vocabulary is the template of the metadata to describe the data ←
13:30:00 <cgueret> ... SLA is a form of a licence term
... SLA is a form of a licence term ←
13:30:07 <markharrison> +q to say provenance is closer to being an intrinsic property of the data - its sources and transformations, irrespective of how it is licenced. Both are aspects of metadata (data about the data). Of course, there may be a provenance aspect of licence, e.g. for GPL licenced components that have impacts on the resulting licence for derived works.
Mark Harrison: +q to say provenance is closer to being an intrinsic property of the data - its sources and transformations, irrespective of how it is licenced. Both are aspects of metadata (data about the data). Of course, there may be a provenance aspect of licence, e.g. for GPL licenced components that have impacts on the resulting licence for derived works. ←
13:30:30 <laufer> vocabulary is the language to describe the metadata
Carlos Laufer: vocabulary is the language to describe the metadata ←
13:30:36 <cgueret> deirdrelee: ok to drop available and interoperable
Deirdre Lee: ok to drop available and interoperable ←
13:30:43 <adler1> well said laufer
Steven Adler: well said laufer ←
13:31:16 <antoine> q+
Antoine Isaac: q+ ←
13:31:46 <deirdrelee> ack deirdrelee
Deirdre Lee: ack deirdrelee ←
13:31:46 <Zakim> deirdrelee, you wanted to ask if differeint standard application-profile still implies interoperability?
Zakim IRC Bot: deirdrelee, you wanted to ask if differeint standard application-profile still implies interoperability? ←
13:32:09 <cgueret> antoine: if someone creates an application profiles that is not interop it is probably because this was needed
Antoine Isaac: if someone creates an application profiles that is not interop it is probably because this was needed ←
13:32:27 <cgueret> ... application profiles should then be a minimal level of compatibility
... application profiles should then be a minimal level of compatibility ←
13:32:52 <antoine> q+
Antoine Isaac: q+ ←
13:33:35 <cgueret> proposed: drop interoperable
PROPOSED: drop interoperable ←
13:34:23 <laufer> q+
Carlos Laufer: q+ ←
13:35:01 <cgueret> ?: license can be changed without changing provenance
Mark Harrison: license can be changed without changing provenance ←
13:35:18 <antoine> s/?/markharrison
13:35:37 <antoine> ack markharrison
Antoine Isaac: ack markharrison ←
13:35:37 <Zakim> markharrison, you wanted to say provenance is closer to being an intrinsic property of the data - its sources and transformations, irrespective of how it is licenced. Both are
Zakim IRC Bot: markharrison, you wanted to say provenance is closer to being an intrinsic property of the data - its sources and transformations, irrespective of how it is licenced. Both are ←
13:35:37 <markharrison> +q to respond to Deidre that the interoperability of two application profiles that are both machine-readable and aligned with standardised terms may also depend on intersection of the machine-readable standards used - if no intersection in format or vocabulary, they may not be interoperable
Mark Harrison: +q to respond to Deidre that the interoperability of two application profiles that are both machine-readable and aligned with standardised terms may also depend on intersection of the machine-readable standards used - if no intersection in format or vocabulary, they may not be interoperable ←
13:35:41 <Zakim> ... aspects of metadata (data about the data). Of course, there may be a provenance aspect of licence, e.g. for GPL licenced components that have impacts on the resulting licence
Zakim IRC Bot: ... aspects of metadata (data about the data). Of course, there may be a provenance aspect of licence, e.g. for GPL licenced components that have impacts on the resulting licence ←
13:35:41 <Zakim> ... for derived works.
Zakim IRC Bot: ... for derived works. ←
13:35:47 <cgueret> adler1: lot of good points but those are vocabulary issues
Steven Adler: lot of good points but those are vocabulary issues ←
13:35:59 <laufer> +1 in respect to drop interoperable
Carlos Laufer: +1 in respect to drop interoperable ←
13:36:05 <cgueret> +1 too
+1 too ←
13:36:18 <deirdrelee> ack antoine
Deirdre Lee: ack antoine ←
13:36:30 <adler1> +1 to drop interoperable
Steven Adler: +1 to drop interoperable ←
13:36:37 <cgueret> antoine: agree with Mark about what he said on provenance
Antoine Isaac: agree with Mark about what he said on provenance ←
13:36:49 <cgueret> ... license prov and SLA should be kept explicit somewhere
... license prov and SLA should be kept explicit somewhere ←
13:36:55 <Zakim> +??P20
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P20 ←
13:36:58 <markharrison> +1
Mark Harrison: +1 ←
13:37:12 <CarlosIglesias> zakim, ??P20 is really me
Carlos Iglesias: zakim, ??P20 is really me ←
13:37:12 <Zakim> +CarlosIglesias; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +CarlosIglesias; got it ←
13:37:26 <cgueret> laufer: we have to talk about standardized instead of just interop
Carlos Laufer: we have to talk about standardized instead of just interop ←
13:37:33 <cgueret> ... interopable is about standardd]\
... interopable is about standardd]\ ←
13:38:08 <cgueret> ... see what is interop with what thing
... see what is interop with what thing ←
13:38:11 <adler1> q
Steven Adler: q ←
13:38:16 <deirdrelee> q?
Deirdre Lee: q? ←
13:38:16 <cgueret> q?
q? ←
13:38:19 <deirdrelee> ack laufer
Deirdre Lee: ack laufer ←
13:38:21 <Zakim> +??P22
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P22 ←
13:38:32 <deirdrelee> q+
Deirdre Lee: q+ ←
13:38:52 <MakxDekkers> zakim, ??P22 is me
Makx Dekkers: zakim, ??P22 is me ←
13:38:52 <Zakim> +MakxDekkers; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +MakxDekkers; got it ←
13:39:03 <cgueret> markharrison: interoperability is about profiles that are machine readable and aligned with vocabularies
Mark Harrison: interoperability is about profiles that are machine readable and aligned with vocabularies ←
13:39:15 <cgueret> ... interop depends on vocabularies used
... interop depends on vocabularies used ←
13:39:30 <cgueret> ... machine readable without same vocabularies used is not interopable
... machine readable without same vocabularies used is not interopable ←
13:39:59 <deirdrelee> PROPOSED Remove 'interoperability' as a separate requirement
Deirdre Lee: PROPOSED Remove 'interoperability' as a separate requirement ←
13:40:08 <antoine> +1
Antoine Isaac: +1 ←
13:40:09 <markharrison> +1
Mark Harrison: +1 ←
13:40:11 <EricKauz> +1
13:40:13 <laufer> +1
Carlos Laufer: +1 ←
13:40:14 <ivan> +1
Ivan Herman: +1 ←
13:40:16 <deirdrelee> +1
Deirdre Lee: +1 ←
13:40:17 <cgueret> deirdrelee: we agree to remove interopable as a specific req and instead merge it with machine readable
Deirdre Lee: we agree to remove interopable as a specific req and instead merge it with machine readable ←
13:40:17 <RiccardoAlbertoni> +1
Riccardo Albertoni: +1 ←
13:40:18 <cgueret> +1
+1 ←
13:40:19 <jerdeb> +1
Jeremy Debattista: +1 ←
13:40:33 <deirdrelee> RESOLVED Remove 'interoperability' as a separate requirement
Deirdre Lee: RESOLVED Remove 'interoperability' as a separate requirement ←
13:40:55 <cgueret> deirdrelee: second proposal about avbailability
Deirdre Lee: second proposal about avbailability ←
13:41:06 <antoine> q+
Antoine Isaac: q+ ←
13:41:13 <cgueret> ... maybe we can include it into another req
... maybe we can include it into another req ←
13:41:18 <markharrison> q-
Mark Harrison: q- ←
13:41:21 <deirdrelee> q-
Deirdre Lee: q- ←
13:41:47 <cgueret> antoine: available should apply to licenses, prov and SLA to record that they should be provided
Antoine Isaac: available should apply to licenses, prov and SLA to record that they should be provided ←
13:41:56 <cgueret> ... and that would be the only req for these
... and that would be the only req for these ←
13:42:10 <laufer> what about data schema
Carlos Laufer: what about data schema ←
13:42:18 <cgueret> deirdrelee: do not agree, for some of them there are more reqs
Deirdre Lee: do not agree, for some of them there are more reqs ←
13:42:54 <adler1> q+
Steven Adler: q+ ←
13:43:39 <cgueret> deirdrelee: prov. sla and license could inherint everything from metadata
Deirdre Lee: prov. sla and license could inherint everything from metadata ←
13:43:46 <cgueret> ... so we don't repeat it
... so we don't repeat it ←
13:44:05 <cgueret> adler1: of course metadata should be available but it's not implying all the fields should be there
Steven Adler: of course metadata should be available but it's not implying all the fields should be there ←
13:44:16 <deirdrelee> ack antoine
Deirdre Lee: ack antoine ←
13:44:20 <antoine> q+
Antoine Isaac: q+ ←
13:44:22 <deirdrelee> ack adler
Deirdre Lee: ack adler ←
13:44:22 <cgueret> ... someone may have a license but chosen not to create an SLA clause
... someone may have a license but chosen not to create an SLA clause ←
13:44:49 <cgueret> ... you can't insist everything is available
... you can't insist everything is available ←
13:45:54 <cgueret> ... strugling a bit with the meaning of "available" actually
... strugling a bit with the meaning of "available" actually ←
13:46:11 <laufer> it sounds like a may, should and must issues...
Carlos Laufer: it sounds like a may, should and must issues... ←
13:46:26 <cgueret> deirdrelee: that's something to work on, suggesting remove metadata as available req
Deirdre Lee: that's something to work on, suggesting remove metadata as available req ←
13:46:35 <deirdrelee> PROPOSED Remove 'metadata-availability' as a separate requirement
Deirdre Lee: PROPOSED Remove 'metadata-availability' as a separate requirement ←
13:46:48 <antoine> +1
Antoine Isaac: +1 ←
13:46:49 <adler1> +1
Steven Adler: +1 ←
13:46:52 <RiccardoAlbertoni> +1
Riccardo Albertoni: +1 ←
13:46:53 <cgueret> +1
+1 ←
13:46:54 <laufer> +1
Carlos Laufer: +1 ←
13:46:56 <markharrison> +1
Mark Harrison: +1 ←
13:46:56 <deirdrelee> +1
Deirdre Lee: +1 ←
13:47:15 <deirdrelee> RESOLVED Remove 'metadata-availability' as a separate requirement
Deirdre Lee: RESOLVED Remove 'metadata-availability' as a separate requirement ←
13:47:22 <jerdeb> +1
Jeremy Debattista: +1 ←
13:47:51 <cgueret> deirdrelee: SLA, prov and licenses are type of metadata
Deirdre Lee: SLA, prov and licenses are type of metadata ←
13:48:10 <laufer> q+
Carlos Laufer: q+ ←
13:48:24 <cgueret> ... we can remove all of those in the table
... we can remove all of those in the table ←
13:48:48 <cgueret> antoine: they should be available when applicable
Antoine Isaac: they should be available when applicable ←
13:48:54 <markharrison> +1 to Antoine's e-mail suggesting to fold availability into other requirements e.g. 'should be made available as/in....'
Mark Harrison: +1 to Antoine's e-mail suggesting to fold availability into other requirements e.g. 'should be made available as/in....' ←
13:48:57 <cgueret> ... if it's there it should be expressed
... if it's there it should be expressed ←
13:49:01 <cgueret> +1 to Antoine
+1 to Antoine ←
13:49:31 <cgueret> deirdrelee: best practice should be there should always be a license there
Deirdre Lee: best practice should be there should always be a license there ←
13:50:48 <cgueret> ... maybe something to do through all the documents, see which keyword to use where
... maybe something to do through all the documents, see which keyword to use where ←
13:51:22 <cgueret> laufer: most important thing is the schema
Carlos Laufer: most important thing is the schema ←
13:51:27 <deirdrelee> Q+
Deirdre Lee: Q+ ←
13:51:28 <cgueret> ... this is the first meta-data
... this is the first meta-data ←
13:51:43 <antoine> q+
Antoine Isaac: q+ ←
13:51:56 <cgueret> ... why don't we have it as a type of metadata ?
... why don't we have it as a type of metadata ? ←
13:52:09 <Zakim> -MakxDekkers
Zakim IRC Bot: -MakxDekkers ←
13:52:23 <deirdrelee> ack antoine
Deirdre Lee: ack antoine ←
13:52:30 <deirdrelee> ack laufer
Deirdre Lee: ack laufer ←
13:52:34 <cgueret> antoine: that relates to the req for vocabularies
Antoine Isaac: that relates to the req for vocabularies ←
13:52:48 <cgueret> deirdrelee: the metadata schema is adressed through all the reqs
Deirdre Lee: the metadata schema is adressed through all the reqs ←
13:53:05 <cgueret> ... there all applied to the metadata schema
... there all applied to the metadata schema ←
13:53:12 <markharrison> +q to propose that licence info should be stated explicitly where possible, since this helps data consumers and application developers to know whether they can use that data as a source. It the licence is unspecified, there may be too much risk of using the dataset (if the data consumer cannot work with whatever licence might be specified in future)
Mark Harrison: +q to propose that licence info should be stated explicitly where possible, since this helps data consumers and application developers to know whether they can use that data as a source. It the licence is unspecified, there may be too much risk of using the dataset (if the data consumer cannot work with whatever licence might be specified in future) ←
13:53:14 <Zakim> +??P8
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P8 ←
13:53:27 <cgueret> ... license prov and SLA are mentionned explicitely as they were highlihted in the UCR document
... license prov and SLA are mentionned explicitely as they were highlihted in the UCR document ←
13:53:39 <cgueret> ... this is why they are specified
... this is why they are specified ←
13:54:19 <cgueret> laufer: ok but why having vocabularies and not schema ?
Carlos Laufer: ok but why having vocabularies and not schema ? ←
13:55:25 <cgueret> adler1: we don't have to worry about omitting licenses
Steven Adler: we don't have to worry about omitting licenses ←
13:55:39 <cgueret> ... it's an obvious req
... it's an obvious req ←
13:55:59 <laufer> ok, antoine
Carlos Laufer: ok, antoine ←
13:56:05 <cgueret> ... the interesting discussion is about the SLA
... the interesting discussion is about the SLA ←
13:57:10 <markharrison> +1 to adler1 re lack of stable SLA and licence potentially limiting reliance on open data
Mark Harrison: +1 to adler1 re lack of stable SLA and licence potentially limiting reliance on open data ←
13:57:29 <deirdrelee> PROPOSED Remove metadata repeated requirements from License, SLA and provenance, and specify they are types of metadata
Deirdre Lee: PROPOSED Remove metadata repeated requirements from License, SLA and provenance, and specify they are types of metadata ←
13:57:48 <antoine> +1
Antoine Isaac: +1 ←
13:57:48 <cgueret> +1
+1 ←
13:57:50 <RiccardoAlbertoni> +1
Riccardo Albertoni: +1 ←
13:57:50 <adler1> +1
Steven Adler: +1 ←
13:57:51 <jerdeb> +1
Jeremy Debattista: +1 ←
13:57:52 <laufer> +1
Carlos Laufer: +1 ←
13:57:53 <EricKauz> +1
13:57:54 <Ig_Bittencourt> +!
Ig Bittencourt Santana Pinto: +! ←
13:57:56 <Ig_Bittencourt> +1
Ig Bittencourt Santana Pinto: +1 ←
13:57:59 <Zakim> -??P8
Zakim IRC Bot: -??P8 ←
13:58:05 <markharrison> +1
Mark Harrison: +1 ←
13:58:22 <deirdrelee> RESOLVED Remove metadata repeated requirements from License, SLA and provenance, and specify they are types of metadata
Deirdre Lee: RESOLVED Remove metadata repeated requirements from License, SLA and provenance, and specify they are types of metadata ←
13:58:42 <cgueret> adler1: thx deirdrelee for a great table that focused a lot of discussion
Steven Adler: thx deirdrelee for a great table that focused a lot of discussion ←
13:58:59 <cgueret> deirdrelee: close issues via e-mail ?
Deirdre Lee: close issues via e-mail ? ←
13:59:36 <cgueret> ... is that ok with W3C practices ?
... is that ok with W3C practices ? ←
13:59:59 <Zakim> -Ivan
Zakim IRC Bot: -Ivan ←
14:00:17 <laufer> bye, nice weekend for all
Carlos Laufer: bye, nice weekend for all ←
14:00:20 <cgueret> deirdrelee: end of meeting
Deirdre Lee: end of meeting ←
14:00:23 <Zakim> -EricKauz
Zakim IRC Bot: -EricKauz ←
14:00:25 <RiccardoAlbertoni> bye
Riccardo Albertoni: bye ←
14:00:25 <markharrison> bye!
Mark Harrison: bye! ←
14:00:29 <cgueret> bye!
bye! ←
14:00:29 <jerdeb> bye
Jeremy Debattista: bye ←
14:00:31 <Zakim> -RiccardoAlbertoni
Zakim IRC Bot: -RiccardoAlbertoni ←
14:00:32 <Zakim> -laufer
Zakim IRC Bot: -laufer ←
14:00:33 <Zakim> -adler1
Zakim IRC Bot: -adler1 ←
14:00:34 <Zakim> -jerdeb
Zakim IRC Bot: -jerdeb ←
14:00:36 <Zakim> -antoine
Zakim IRC Bot: -antoine ←
14:00:39 <CarlosIglesias> bye!
Carlos Iglesias: bye! ←
14:01:03 <Zakim> -CarlosIglesias
Zakim IRC Bot: -CarlosIglesias ←
14:01:12 <cgueret> deirdrelee: do we need to launch any command before closing the chat ?
Deirdre Lee: do we need to launch any command before closing the chat ? ←
14:01:13 <antoine> we have to close issues in calls but we can record proposal and agreement of people involved in issue
Antoine Isaac: we have to close issues in calls but we can record proposal and agreement of people involved in issue ←
14:01:34 <Zakim> -??P18
Zakim IRC Bot: -??P18 ←
14:01:40 <deirdrelee> cgueret, just checking
Deirdre Lee: cgueret, just checking ←
14:02:08 <Zakim> -cgueret
Zakim IRC Bot: -cgueret ←
14:02:37 <Zakim> -deirdrelee
Zakim IRC Bot: -deirdrelee ←
14:02:37 <Zakim> DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has ended ←
14:02:37 <Zakim> Attendees were antoine, EricKauz, deirdrelee, cgueret, +1.516.353.aaaa, adler1, RiccardoAlbertoni, laufer, Ivan, jerdeb, CarlosIglesias, MakxDekkers
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were antoine, EricKauz, deirdrelee, cgueret, +1.516.353.aaaa, adler1, RiccardoAlbertoni, laufer, Ivan, jerdeb, CarlosIglesias, MakxDekkers ←
14:03:38 <deirdrelee> no, they seem to be here already http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-08-29
Deirdre Lee: no, they seem to be here already http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-08-29 ←
14:03:54 <deirdrelee> bye
Deirdre Lee: bye ←
14:04:00 <cgueret> great
great ←
14:04:02 <cgueret> bye
bye ←
Formatted by CommonScribe