ISSUE-77: why MUST a LDPR declare its type?

types of LDPR

why MUST a LDPR declare its type?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Linked Data Platform Spec

Raised by:

Roger Menday

Opened on:

2013-05-30

Description:

Section 4.1.5 says that "LDPRs MUST use the predicate rdf:type to represent the concept of type."

While it might be useful to know the type of the LDPR it's not essential to work with the interaction capabilities that LDP is offering and therefore this is more of a best practice. I propose to remove this from the specification and add it to the Deployment Guide.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. LDP Rec (from eric@w3.org on 2015-02-20)
2. Re: ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-31)
3. Re: ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] (from sspeiche@gmail.com on 2013-05-30)
4. Re: ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2013-05-30)
5. Re: ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2013-05-30)
6. Re: ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] (from roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com on 2013-05-30)
7. Re: ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-30)
8. ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-05-30)

Related notes:

Display change log