ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation

membersInlined

Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Linked Data Platform Spec
Raised by:
Richard Cyganiak
Opened on:
2013-03-15
Description:
The spec already allows adding partial descriptions of members to the container representation. If these descriptions happen to be *complete*, then it would be nice to be able to indicate that fact. So that a client doesn't have to dereference each member in order to be sure that it has complete data.

PROPOSAL: Add a property ldp:membersInlined true/false. The default (if not specified) is false. If true, it means that a complete description of all members [on the current page] are inlined with the container document [or page], and therefore clients SHOULD NOT do GET on the member URIs to retrieve additional triples.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. LDP Rec (from eric@w3.org on 2015-02-20)
  2. Re: Editors draft now has inlining - issue-58 (from Erik.Wilde@emc.com on 2013-07-11)
  3. Re: Editors draft now has inlining - issue-58 (from sspeiche@gmail.com on 2013-07-10)
  4. Re: Editors draft now has inlining - issue-58 (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2013-07-10)
  5. Re: Editors draft now has inlining - issue-58 (from ashok.malhotra@oracle.com on 2013-07-10)
  6. Editors draft now has inlining - issue-58 (from johnarwe@us.ibm.com on 2013-07-10)
  7. Re: LDP-Server - Issue-58 (from kidehen@openlinksw.com on 2013-06-13)
  8. Re: LDP-Server - Issue-58 (from Erik.Wilde@emc.com on 2013-06-13)
  9. Re: LDP-Server - Issue-58 (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-06-13)
  10. Re: LDP-Server - Issue-57 (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-06-13)
  11. Re: LDP-Server - Issue-58 (from pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr on 2013-06-13)
  12. Re: LDP-Server - Issue-58 (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2013-06-13)
  13. LDP-Server - Issue-58 (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-06-12)
  14. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from johnarwe@us.ibm.com on 2013-05-28)
  15. Re: Specification edits for Issue-54 resolution (from sspeiche@gmail.com on 2013-05-23)
  16. Specification edits for Issue-54 resolution (from nmihindu@fi.upm.es on 2013-05-23)
  17. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-20)
  18. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (from kidehen@openlinksw.com on 2013-05-19)
  19. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (from kidehen@openlinksw.com on 2013-05-19)
  20. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (from kidehen@openlinksw.com on 2013-05-19)
  21. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2013-05-19)
  22. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-19)
  23. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from ashok.malhotra@oracle.com on 2013-05-19)
  24. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-19)
  25. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-19)
  26. ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from ashok.malhotra@oracle.com on 2013-05-19)
  27. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2013-05-19)
  28. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-18)
  29. Conclusion -- Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-18)
  30. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-18)
  31. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2013-05-18)
  32. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2013-05-18)
  33. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (from Erik.Wilde@emc.com on 2013-05-18)
  34. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (from Erik.Wilde@emc.com on 2013-05-18)
  35. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2013-05-18)
  36. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-18)
  37. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2013-05-18)
  38. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-18)
  39. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-18)
  40. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-18)
  41. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2013-05-18)
  42. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-18)
  43. Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from johnarwe@us.ibm.com on 2013-05-17)
  44. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2013-05-16)
  45. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-16)
  46. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2013-05-16)
  47. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-16)
  48. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2013-05-15)
  49. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-15)
  50. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2013-05-15)
  51. Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2013-05-15)
  52. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-15)
  53. Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from sspeiche@gmail.com on 2013-05-15)
  54. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2013-05-15)
  55. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-15)
  56. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2013-05-15)
  57. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-15)
  58. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from sspeiche@gmail.com on 2013-05-14)
  59. Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from nmihindu@fi.upm.es on 2013-05-14)
  60. Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from kidehen@openlinksw.com on 2013-05-13)
  61. ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-05-13)
  62. Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from johnarwe@us.ibm.com on 2013-05-08)
  63. Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from johnarwe@us.ibm.com on 2013-05-08)
  64. Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from sspeiche@gmail.com on 2013-05-06)
  65. Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr on 2013-05-06)
  66. Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from sspeiche@gmail.com on 2013-05-06)
  67. Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr on 2013-05-06)
  68. Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr on 2013-05-06)
  69. Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from johnarwe@us.ibm.com on 2013-05-06)
  70. Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from nmihindu@fi.upm.es on 2013-05-03)
  71. Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from johnarwe@us.ibm.com on 2013-05-01)
  72. Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from johnarwe@us.ibm.com on 2013-05-01)
  73. Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2013-04-30)
  74. Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from Roger.Menday@uk.fujitsu.com on 2013-04-30)
  75. Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2013-04-30)
  76. Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com on 2013-04-30)
  77. On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2013-04-30)
  78. Re: ldp-ISSUE-58 (membersInlined): Property for asserting that complete description of members is included [Linked Data Platform core] (from pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr on 2013-04-15)
  79. Re: ldp-ISSUE-58 (membersInlined): Property for asserting that complete description of members is included [Linked Data Platform core] (from roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com on 2013-04-15)
  80. Re: ldp-ISSUE-58 (membersInlined): Property for asserting that complete description of members is included [Linked Data Platform core] (from pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr on 2013-04-15)
  81. Re: ldp-ISSUE-58 (membersInlined): Property for asserting that complete description of members is included [Linked Data Platform core] (from tthibodeau@openlinksw.com on 2013-04-15)
  82. Re: ldp-ISSUE-58 (membersInlined): Property for asserting that complete description of members is included [Linked Data Platform core] (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-04-15)
  83. Re: ldp-ISSUE-58 (membersInlined): Property for asserting that complete description of members is included [Linked Data Platform core] (from Erik.Wilde@emc.com on 2013-03-15)
  84. ldp-ISSUE-58 (membersInlined): Property for asserting that complete description of members is included [Linked Data Platform core] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-03-15)

Related notes:

Resolution: Close Issue-58, per Richard's proposal (described in the decription of the issue), marking the feature AT RISK.
See https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2013-06-20#resolution_12

Arnaud Le Hors, 20 Jun 2013, 16:19:20

Display change log ATOM feed

Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 58.html,v 1.1 2015/08/17 04:43:10 denis Exp $