[Odrl-version2] Make it Simpler?

[Susanne Guth]

Hi Renato,

this is a viable alternative for me to the ODRLv2 document structure we currently have. Any other comments of the ODRL community members?

Susanne

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 16:11:00 +1000
Von: Renato Iannella <renato at odrl.net>
An: "ODRL Version 2.0" <odrl-version2 at odrl.net>
CC: 
Betreff: Re: [Odrl-version2] Make it Simpler?

> 
> On 4 Feb 2007, at 01:30, Susanne Guth wrote:
> 
> > I see what you mean. Maybe we can declare core elements and then  
> > make suggestions for complemenatary elements, such as Negotiation  
> > and so on. In the same chapter we should encourage the ODRL users  
> > to define their own additional elements. However, I think we should  
> > keep this all in one document, or would you suggest to have the  
> > core only in our ODRL V2 Document?
> 
> I was thinking that the "ODRL V2 Core" is a separate document
> (a cut down version of what we have now).
> 
> Then we can have the extensions:
>   "ODRL V2 - Negotiation"
>   "ODRL V2 - Payments"
>   etc
> 
> 
> What do others think?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Renato Iannella
> ODRL Initiative
> http://odrl.net
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ODRL-Version2 mailing list
> ODRL-Version2 at odrl.net
> http://lists.odrl.net/mailman/listinfo/odrl-version2

-- 
Susanne Guth
cantoergosum at guth.it
http://cantoergosum.guth.it/

"Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ...
Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail?ac=OM.GX.GX003K11713T4783a