[Odrl-version2] Make it Simpler?

[Susanne Guth]

Hi Renato,

I see what you mean. Maybe we can declare core elements and then make suggestions for complemenatary elements, such as Negotiation and so on. In the same chapter we should encourage the ODRL users to define their own additional elements. However, I think we should keep this all in one document, or would you suggest to have the core only in our ODRL V2 Document?

Susanne


-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:31:21 +1000
Von: Renato Iannella <renato at odrl.net>
An: "ODRL Version 2.0" <odrl-version2 at odrl.net>
CC: 
Betreff: [Odrl-version2] Make it Simpler?

> 
> Alapan's email and a recent paper [1] have made me re-think the ODRL  
> V2.0 path.
> 
> We have a choice of making ODRL V2.0 more complex OR we can make the  
> CORE language simple
> and support extensions for related DRM implementations.
> 
> That is, ODRL has a core REL aspect that does not include all the  
> associated functions like
> Digital Signatures, negotiations, legal stuff etc. All that can be  
> added with specific profiles.
> The idea is we keep the core language "clean" from these additional  
> features.
> 
> This is just an idea - and I welcome comments from the WG.
> 
> (and happy new year to all!)
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Renato Iannella
> ODRL Initiative
> http://odrl.net
> 
> [1] <http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm? 
> id=1179522&jmp=references&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=15151515&CFTOKEN=6184 
> 618>
> _______________________________________________
> ODRL-Version2 mailing list
> ODRL-Version2 at odrl.net
> http://lists.odrl.net/mailman/listinfo/odrl-version2

-- 
Susanne Guth
cantoergosum at guth.it
http://cantoergosum.guth.it/

Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! 
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer