[Odrl-version2] New ODRL v2.0 Model

[Susanne Guth]

Hi,

I don't have a problem with the two rights expressions below. Why do we want
to relate certain actions to duties only? 

For example, if there's one special accountant in a company that is allowed
to do payments that are over 5000 € he requires an according permission.

I think, that if we constrain a certain vocabulary to permissions/ or duties
we reduce the flexibility of our language. 

I think, the software/system that uses ODRL v2 rights expressions would have
to decide what actions make sense as permissions and duties. I don't think
its our work to do. Discussion opened :)

So long
Susanne
> 
> 
> On 1 Feb 2006, at 01:43, Alapan Arnab wrote:
> 
> >
> > But from purely an implementation point of view - if payment is an
> > action, wouldn't both the following code fragments be correct?
> >
> > <duty id="1" relaxed="true">
> >    <payment>
> >       <amount currency="EUR">1</amount>
> >    </payment>
> > </duty>
> >
> > <permission>
> >    <payment>
> >       <amount currency="EUR">1</amount>
> >    </payment>
> > </duty>
> 
> True...
> 
> We need a way to constrain some Actions to Permissions and some to  
> Duties only...
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Renato Iannella
> ODRL Initiative
> http://odrl.net
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ODRL-Version2 mailing list
> ODRL-Version2 at odrl.net
> http://lists.odrl.net/mailman/listinfo/odrl-version2
> 

-- 
Susanne Guth
susanne at odrl.net
ODRL Initiative
http://odrl.net/

Telefonieren Sie schon oder sparen Sie noch?
NEU: GMX Phone_Flat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/telefonie