ISSUE-57: Revisit "A request to define subset of RDFS with a more conventional layered architecture"

revisit-rdfs-layered-subset

Revisit "A request to define subset of RDFS with a more conventional layered architecture"

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Cleanup tasks

Raised by:

David Wood

Opened on:

2011-05-03

Description:

See http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-layered-subset
rdfs-layered-subset: A request to define subset of RDFS with a more
conventional layered architecture

Propose to resolve CONTINUE to bear this in mind as Semantics are revised /
improved based on deployment experience.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: Signal for semantic extensions (from david@dbooth.org on 2013-05-20)
2. Re: Signal for semantic extensions (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-05-19)
3. Re: Signal for semantic extensions (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2013-05-18)
4. Re: Signal for semantic extensions (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-05-18)
5. Re: Signal for semantic extensions (from david@dbooth.org on 2013-05-18)
6. Re: Signal for semantic extensions (from eric@w3.org on 2013-05-18)
7. Re: Signal for semantic extensions (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2013-05-18)
8. Re: Signal for semantic extensions (from david@dbooth.org on 2013-05-17)
9. Re: Status update on LC comments and post-LC changes to R2RML (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-11-07)
10. Status update on LC comments and post-LC changes to R2RML (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-11-07)
11. Re: RDFS is in Mercurial (from david@3roundstones.com on 2011-08-10)
12. RDF-ISSUE-57 (revisit-rdfs-layered-subset): Revisit 'A request to define subset of RDFS with a more conventional layered architecture' [Cleanup tasks] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-05-03)

Related notes:

Display change log