ISSUE-39: rdf: and rdfs: namespace should resolve to something that meets best practices

namespace-publishing

State:

CLOSED

Product:

RDF Admin

Raised by:

Richard Cyganiak

Opened on:

2011-04-16

Description:

Dan Brickley said [1]:

â€œWould be nice in 2011+ if the URIs for http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-synax-ns and nearby were a bit more human-friendly (RDFa? conneg?) and were around 2 clicks away from a community wiki...â€

Ideally, the rdf: and rdfs: namespace would resolve to a nice content-negotiated resource with RDF/XML, Turtle, N-Triples, RDF/JSON and HTML+RDFa variants and versioning.

See [2], [3] and [4] for some guidance and implementations.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Apr/0258.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/
[4] http://neologism.deri.ie/

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

Re: RDFS is in Mercurial (from david@3roundstones.com on 2011-08-10)
Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-05-25)
Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-05-25)
Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? (from antoine.zimmermann@gmail.com on 2011-04-17)
Re: RDF-ISSUE-39: rdf: and rdfs: namespace should resolve to something that meets best practices (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-04-16)
RDF-ISSUE-39: rdf: and rdfs: namespace should resolve to something that meets best practices (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-04-16)

CLOSED by making this an action for Sandro Hawke.

David Wood, 13 Oct 2011, 16:29:27