ISSUE-20: The prefixed name "ns:123" is legal in SPARQL - should it be legal for Turtle?

Numeric local part

The prefixed name "ns:123" is legal in SPARQL - should it be legal for Turtle?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
RDF Turtle
Raised by:
Andy Seaborne
Opened on:
2011-03-30
Description:
It is legal in SPARQL 1.0 because of user feedback to an earlier version of the grammar when it wasn't (DAWG).
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: RDF-ISSUE-20 (Numeric local part): The prefixed name 'ns:123' is legal in SPARQL - should it be legal for Turtle? [RDF Turtle] (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2011-03-30)
  2. RDF-ISSUE-20 (Numeric local part): The prefixed name 'ns:123' is legal in SPARQL - should it be legal for Turtle? [RDF Turtle] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-03-30)

Related notes:

Yes, was added for FPWD.

Gavin Carothers, 23 Aug 2011, 21:01:23

Display change log ATOM feed


Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, Chair, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Staff Contacts
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 20.html,v 1.1 2014-07-09 12:17:59 carine Exp $