ISSUE-20: The prefixed name "ns:123" is legal in SPARQL - should it be legal for Turtle?
Numeric local part
The prefixed name "ns:123" is legal in SPARQL - should it be legal for Turtle?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDF Turtle
- Raised by:
- Andy Seaborne
- Opened on:
- 2011-03-30
- Description:
- It is legal in SPARQL 1.0 because of user feedback to an earlier version of the grammar when it wasn't (DAWG).
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-20 (Numeric local part): The prefixed name 'ns:123' is legal in SPARQL - should it be legal for Turtle? [RDF Turtle] (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2011-03-30)
- RDF-ISSUE-20 (Numeric local part): The prefixed name 'ns:123' is legal in SPARQL - should it be legal for Turtle? [RDF Turtle] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-03-30)
Related notes:
Yes, was added for FPWD.
Gavin Carothers, 23 Aug 2011, 21:01:23Display change log
