ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?

Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

RDF Turtle

Raised by:

Opened on:

2011-03-30

Description:

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2012-05-16)
2. Re: Turtle and predicate object lists. (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2012-05-16)
3. Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-15)
4. Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-05-15)
5. Re: Turtle and predicate object lists. (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-05-15)
6. Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-05-15)
7. Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle (from gavin@carothers.name on 2012-05-14)
8. Remaining Open Issues in Turtle (from gavin@carothers.name on 2012-05-14)
9. Re: Turtle and predicate object lists. (from alexhall@revelytix.com on 2012-05-14)
10. Re: Issues found in Turtle spec (from alexhall@revelytix.com on 2011-08-29)
11. Re: Issues found in Turtle spec (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2011-08-29)
12. Re: Issues found in Turtle spec (from alexhall@revelytix.com on 2011-08-29)
13. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from ww@styx.org on 2011-04-04)
14. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from sandro@w3.org on 2011-04-04)
15. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2011-04-04)
16. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from sandro@w3.org on 2011-04-03)
17. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from alexhall@revelytix.com on 2011-04-02)
18. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2011-04-02)
19. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-04-01)
20. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from alexhall@revelytix.com on 2011-04-01)
21. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from david.wood@talis.com on 2011-04-01)
22. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2011-04-01)
23. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2011-04-01)
24. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2011-04-01)
25. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-04-01)
26. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2011-03-31)
27. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-03-31)
28. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2011-03-31)
29. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2011-03-31)
30. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from nathan@webr3.org on 2011-03-31)
31. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-03-31)
32. Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-03-31)
33. ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like '[ :p 123 ].' as SPARQL does ? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-03-30)

Related notes:

Display change log